Literature DB >> 18057108

The influence of briefly presented randomized target motion on the extraretinal component of ocular pursuit.

G R Barnes1, C J S Collins.   

Abstract

We assessed the ability to extract velocity information from brief exposure of a moving target and sought evidence that this information could be used to modulate the extraretinal component of ocular pursuit. A step-ramp target motion was initially visible for a brief randomized period of 50, 100, 150, or 200 ms, but then extinguished for a randomized period of 400 or 600 ms before reappearing and continuing along its trajectory. Target speed (5-20 degrees /s), direction (left/right), and intertrial interval (2.7-3.7 s) were also randomized. Smooth eye movements were initiated after about 130 ms and comprised an initial visually dependent component, which reached a peak velocity that increased with target velocity and initial exposure duration, followed by a sustained secondary component that actually increased throughout extinction for 50- and 100-ms initial exposures. End-extinction eye velocity, reflecting extraretinal drive, increased with initial exposure from 50 to 100 ms but remained similar for longer exposures; it was significantly scaled to target velocity for 150- and 200-ms exposures. The results suggest that extraretinal drive is based on a sample of target velocity, mostly acquired during the first 150 ms, that is stored and forms a goal for generating appropriately scaled eye movements during absence of visual input. End-extinction eye velocity was significantly higher when target reappearance was expected than when it was not, confirming the importance of expectation in generating sustained smooth movement. However, end-extinction eye displacement remained similar irrespective of expectation, suggesting that the ability to use sampled velocity information to predict future target displacement operates independently of the control of smooth eye movement.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18057108     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01033.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  17 in total

1.  Evidence for a link between the extra-retinal component of random-onset pursuit and the anticipatory pursuit of predictable object motion.

Authors:  G R Barnes; C J S Collins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Normal aging affects movement execution but not visual motion working memory and decision-making delay during cue-dependent memory-based smooth-pursuit.

Authors:  Kikuro Fukushima; Graham R Barnes; Norie Ito; Peter M Olley; Tateo Warabi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Disappearance of the inversion effect during memory-guided tracking of scrambled biological motion.

Authors:  Changhao Jiang; Guang H Yue; Tingting Chen; Jinhong Ding
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

5.  The effect of concurrent hand movement on estimated time to contact in a prediction motion task.

Authors:  Ran Zheng; Brian K V Maraj
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Clinical application of eye movement tasks as an aid to understanding Parkinson's disease pathophysiology.

Authors:  Kikuro Fukushima; Junko Fukushima; Graham R Barnes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The influence of cues and stimulus history on the non-linear frequency characteristics of the pursuit response to randomized target motion.

Authors:  Graham R Barnes; C J Sue Collins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Catch-up saccades in head-unrestrained conditions reveal that saccade amplitude is corrected using an internal model of target movement.

Authors:  Pierre M Daye; Gunnar Blohm; Phillippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Typical object velocity influences motion extrapolation.

Authors:  Alexis D J Makin; Andrew J Stewart; Ellen Poliakoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Cue-dependent memory-based smooth-pursuit in normal human subjects: importance of extra-retinal mechanisms for initial pursuit.

Authors:  Norie Ito; Graham R Barnes; Junko Fukushima; Kikuro Fukushima; Tateo Warabi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.