Literature DB >> 26921459

Evaluation of the SediMax automated microscopy sediment analyzer and the Sysmex UF-1000i flow cytometer as screening tools to rule out negative urinary tract infections.

Melania Íñigo1, Andreu Coello2, Gema Fernández-Rivas3, María Carrasco3, Clara Marcó3, Anabel Fernández4, Teresa Casamajor4, Vicente Ausina5.   

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are highly prevalent in nosocomial and community settings, and their diagnosis is costly and time-consuming. Screening methods represent an important advance towards the final UTI diagnosis, diminishing inappropriate treatment or clinical complications. Automated analyzers have been developed and commercialized to screen and rule out negative urine samples. The aim of this study was to evaluate two of these automated analyzers (SediMax, an automatic sediment analyzer and UF-1000i a flow cytometer) to predict negative urine cultures. A total of 1934 urine samples were analyzed. A very strong correlation for white blood cells (WBC) (rs: 0.928) and a strong correlation for bacteria (BAC) (rs: 0.693) were obtained. We also calculated optimal cut-off points for both autoanalyzers: 18 WBC/μL and 97 BAC/μL for SediMax (sensitivity=96.25%, specificity=63.04%, negative predictive value=97.97%), and 40 WBC/μL and 460 BAC/μL for UF-1000i (sensitivity=98.13%, specificity=79.16%, negative predictive value=99.18%). The use of SediMax and UF-1000i resulted in a 46.33% and 57.19% reduction of all samples cultured, respectively. In conclusion, both analyzers are good UTI screening tools in our setting.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoanalyzers; Automated urine sediment; Flow cytometry; Urinalysis; Urinary tract infection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26921459     DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chim Acta        ISSN: 0009-8981            Impact factor:   3.786


  12 in total

Review 1.  New and developing diagnostic technologies for urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Michael Davenport; Kathleen E Mach; Linda M Dairiki Shortliffe; Niaz Banaei; Tza-Huei Wang; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Comparative Performance Analysis of Urised 3 and DIRUI FUS-200 Automated Urine Sediment Analyzers and Manual Microscopic Method.

Authors:  Emre Yalcinkaya; Hayriye Erman; Eray Kirac; Afife Serifoglu; Alperen Aksoy; Ferruh K Isman; Mustafa B Cekmen
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2019-09-27

3.  No need for a urine culture in elderly hospitalized patients with a negative dipstick test result.

Authors:  Zvi Shimoni; Vered Hermush; Joseph Glick; Paul Froom
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Use of Automated Urine Microscopy Analysis in Clinical Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection: Defining an Optimal Diagnostic Score in an Academic Medical Center Population.

Authors:  Dimard E Foudraine; Martijn P Bauer; Anne Russcher; Elske Kusters; Christa M Cobbaert; Martha T van der Beek; Janneke E Stalenhoef
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Automated Flow Cytometry: An Alternative to Urine Culture in a Routine Clinical Microbiology Laboratory?

Authors:  Patricia Mejuto; Mariam Luengo; Julio Díaz-Gigante
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-27

Review 6.  Progress in Automated Urinalysis.

Authors:  Matthijs Oyaert; Joris Delanghe
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Using artificial intelligence to reduce diagnostic workload without compromising detection of urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Ross J Burton; Mahableshwar Albur; Matthias Eberl; Simone M Cuff
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  [Evaluation of Sysmex UF-1000i® flow cytometer as a screening method for asymptomatic bacteriuria and detection of Group B Streptococcus in pregnancy].

Authors:  I Angulo López; M Urrutikoetxea-Gutiérrez; J Aragón-Díez; M Fraca Padilla; J L Díaz de Tuesta Del Arco
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 1.553

9.  Evaluation of Acridine Orange Staining for a Semi-Automated Urinalysis Microscopic Examination at the Point-of-Care.

Authors:  Amy J Powless; Sandra P Prieto; Madison R Gramling; Roxanna J Conley; Gregory G Holley; Timothy J Muldoon
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-18

10.  High false positive rate of white blood cells in urine samples of pregnant women may be caused by epithelial cells being misclassified by the sysmex UF-1000i urine flow cytometer.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Xiaochen Yu; Dan Liu; Xiuru Guan
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.058

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.