PURPOSE: Therapy stratification based on genetic markers is becoming increasingly important, which makes commitment to the highest possible reliability of the involved markers mandatory. In neuroblastic tumors, amplification of the MYCN gene is an unequivocal marker that indicates aggressive tumor behavior and is consequently used for therapy stratification. To guarantee reliable and standardized quality of genetic features, a quality-assessment study was initiated by the European Neuroblastoma Quality Assessment (ENQUA; connected to International Society of Pediatric Oncology) Group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-seven coded specimens from 17 tumors were analyzed in 11 European national/regional reference laboratories using molecular techniques, in situ hybridization, and flow and image cytometry. Tumor samples with divergent results were re-evaluated. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-two investigations were performed, which resulted in 23 divergent findings, 17 of which were judged as errors after re-evaluation. MYCN analyses determined by Southern blot and in situ hybridization led to 3.7% and 4% of errors, respectively. Tumor cell content was not indicated in 32% of the samples, and 11% of seemingly correct MYCN results were based on the investigation of normal cells (eg, Schwann cells). Thirty-eight investigations were considered nonassessable. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the importance of revealing the difficulties and limitations for each technique and problems in interpreting results, which are crucial for therapeutic decisions. Moreover, it led to the formulation of guidelines that are applicable to all kinds of tumors and that contain the standardization of techniques, including the exact determination of the tumor cell content. Finally, the group has developed a common terminology for molecular-genetic results.
PURPOSE: Therapy stratification based on genetic markers is becoming increasingly important, which makes commitment to the highest possible reliability of the involved markers mandatory. In neuroblastic tumors, amplification of the MYCN gene is an unequivocal marker that indicates aggressive tumor behavior and is consequently used for therapy stratification. To guarantee reliable and standardized quality of genetic features, a quality-assessment study was initiated by the European Neuroblastoma Quality Assessment (ENQUA; connected to International Society of Pediatric Oncology) Group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-seven coded specimens from 17 tumors were analyzed in 11 European national/regional reference laboratories using molecular techniques, in situ hybridization, and flow and image cytometry. Tumor samples with divergent results were re-evaluated. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-two investigations were performed, which resulted in 23 divergent findings, 17 of which were judged as errors after re-evaluation. MYCN analyses determined by Southern blot and in situ hybridization led to 3.7% and 4% of errors, respectively. Tumor cell content was not indicated in 32% of the samples, and 11% of seemingly correct MYCN results were based on the investigation of normal cells (eg, Schwann cells). Thirty-eight investigations were considered nonassessable. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the importance of revealing the difficulties and limitations for each technique and problems in interpreting results, which are crucial for therapeutic decisions. Moreover, it led to the formulation of guidelines that are applicable to all kinds of tumors and that contain the standardization of techniques, including the exact determination of the tumor cell content. Finally, the group has developed a common terminology for molecular-genetic results.
Authors: Yania Yáñez; David Hervás; Elena Grau; Silvestre Oltra; Gema Pérez; Sarai Palanca; Mar Bermúdez; Catalina Márquez; Adela Cañete; Victoria Castel Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2015-10-24 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Yania Yáñez; Elena Grau; Silvestre Oltra; Adela Cañete; Francisco Martínez; Carmen Orellana; Rosa Noguera; Sarai Palanca; Victoria Castel Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2011-06-25 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Kevin Campbell; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Meegan Mann; Arlene H Naranjo; Collin Van Ryn; Rochelle Bagatell; Katherine K Matthay; Wendy B London; Meredith S Irwin; Hiroyuki Shimada; M Meaghan Granger; Michael D Hogarty; Julie R Park; Steven G DuBois Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Marta Jeison; Shifra Ash; Gili Halevy-Berko; Jacques Mardoukh; Drorit Luria; Smadar Avigad; Galina Feinberg-Gorenshtein; Yacov Goshen; Gabriel Hertzel; Joseph Kapelushnik; Ayelet Ben Barak; Dina Attias; Ran Steinberg; Jerry Stein; Batia Stark; Isaac Yaniv Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Jane Carr-Wilkinson; Kieran O'Toole; Katrina M Wood; Christine C Challen; Angela G Baker; Julian R Board; Laura Evans; Michael Cole; Nai-Kong V Cheung; Joachim Boos; Gabriele Köhler; Ivo Leuschner; Andrew D J Pearson; John Lunec; Deborah A Tweddle Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-02-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Victoria Castel; Eva Villamón; Adela Cañete; Samuel Navarro; Amparo Ruiz; Carmen Melero; Antonio Herrero; Yania Yáñez; Rosa Noguera Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Rochelle Bagatell; Maja Beck-Popovic; Wendy B London; Yang Zhang; Andrew D J Pearson; Katherine K Matthay; Tom Monclair; Peter F Ambros; Susan L Cohn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Eva Villamón; Marta Piqueras; Carlos Mackintosh; Javier Alonso; Enrique de Alava; Samuel Navarro; Rosa Noguera Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2008-06-24 Impact factor: 4.064