Literature DB >> 26916485

Outcomes in Patients With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Left Main Stenting: The TAVR-LM Registry.

Tarun Chakravarty1, Rahul Sharma1, Yigal Abramowitz2, Samir Kapadia3, Azeem Latib4, Hasan Jilaihawi1, Kanhaiya Lal Poddar3, Gennaro Giustino4, Henrique B Ribeiro5, Didier Tchetche6, Benoit Monteil6, Luca Testa7, Giuseppe Tarantini8, Michela Facchin8, Thierry Lefèvre9, Brian R Lindman10, Babak Hariri1, Jigar Patel1, Nobuyuki Takahashi1, George Matar1, James Mirocha1, Wen Cheng1, Murat E Tuzcu3, Horst Sievert11, Josep Rodés-Cabau5, Antonio Colombo4, Ariel Finkelstein12, Jean Fajadet6, Raj R Makkar13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A percutaneous approach with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the left main coronary artery (LM) is frequently used in high-risk patients with coexisting aortic stenosis and LM disease. Outcomes of TAVR plus LM PCI have not been previously reported.
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the TAVR-LM registry is to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR plus LM PCI.
METHODS: Clinical, echocardiographic, computed tomographic, and angiographic characteristics were retrospectively collected in 204 patients undergoing TAVR plus LM PCI. In total, 128 matched patient pairs were generated by performing 1:1 case-control matching between 167 patients with pre-existing LM stents undergoing TAVR and 1,188 control patients undergoing TAVR without LM revascularization.
RESULTS: One-year mortality (9.4% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.83) was similar between the TAVR plus LM PCI cohort and matched controls. One-year mortality after TAVR plus LM PCI was not different in patients with unprotected compared with protected LMs (7.8% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.88), those undergoing LM PCI within 3 months compared with those with LM PCI greater than 3 months before TAVR (7.4% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.61), and those with ostial versus nonostial LM stents (10.3% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.20). Unplanned LM PCI performed because of TAVR-related coronary complication, compared with planned LM PCI performed for pre-existing LM disease, resulted in increased 30-day (15.8% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.013) and 1-year (21.1% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.071) mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the anatomic proximity of the aortic annulus to the LM, TAVR plus LM PCI is safe and technically feasible, with short- and intermediate-term clinical outcomes comparable with those in patients undergoing TAVR alone. These results suggest that TAVR plus LM PCI is a reasonable option for patients who are at high risk for surgery.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve stenosis; coronary artery disease; percutaneous coronary intervention; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26916485      PMCID: PMC5091082          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  16 in total

Review 1.  Pre-implantation balloon-aortic valvuloplasty before transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is this still needed?

Authors:  Rafail A Kotronias; Michael Teitelbaum; Rodrigo Bagur
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  To revascularize or not before transcatheter aortic valve implantation?

Authors:  Sergio Perez; Torin P Thielhelm; Mauricio G Cohen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Coronary Revascularisation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Candidates: Why, Who, When?

Authors:  Davide Cao; Mauro Chiarito; Paolo Pagnotta; Bernhard Reimers; Giulio G Stefanini
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-05

Review 4.  Mechanical circulatory support in patients with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Mohamad Alkhouli; Ahmed Al Mustafa; Zakeih Chaker; Fahad Alqahtani; Sami Aljohani; David R Holmes
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 1.620

5.  Revascularizing coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Rafail A Kotronias; Mamas A Mamas; Rodrigo Bagur
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Challenges in Aortic Stenosis: Review of Antiplatelet/Anticoagulant Therapy Management with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): TAVR with Recent PCI, TAVR in the Patient with Atrial Fibrillation, and TAVR Thrombosis Management.

Authors:  Matthew W Sherwood; Amit N Vora
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Impact of Transcatheter Technology on Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Volume, Outcomes, and Cost.

Authors:  Robert B Hawkins; Emily A Downs; Lily E Johnston; J Hunter Mehaffey; Clifford E Fonner; Ravi K Ghanta; Alan M Speir; Jeffrey B Rich; Mohammed A Quader; Leora T Yarboro; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Pre-TAVR: Current State of the Evidence.

Authors:  Lukas S Keller; Vassili Panagides; Jules Mesnier; Jorge Nuche; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.955

Review 9.  Should All Low-risk Patients Now Be Considered for TAVR? Operative Risk, Clinical, and Anatomic Considerations.

Authors:  Saima Siddique; Hemal Gada; Mubashir A Mumtaz; Amit N Vora
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Obstruction of 2 Coronary Arteries from Different Causes Immediately after Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Umihiko Kaneko; Ryuji Koshima; Hirosato Doi; Tsutomu Fujita
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2020-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.