Lukas S Keller1, Vassili Panagides1, Jules Mesnier1, Jorge Nuche1, Josep Rodés-Cabau2. 1. Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, 2725 Chemin Ste-Foy, Québec City, Québec, G1V 4G5, Canada. 2. Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, 2725 Chemin Ste-Foy, Québec City, Québec, G1V 4G5, Canada. josep.rodes@criucpq.ulaval.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review intends to give an up-to-date overview of the current state of evidence in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), focusing on percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) pre-TAVR. RECENT FINDINGS: The recently published ACTIVATION trial is the 1st randomized trial comparing coronary revascularization (PCI) versus medical treatment in patients with significant CAD undergoing TAVR. With the caveat of several major limitations of the trial, the results of this study raised the question about the appropriateness of the common practice to routinely revascularize coronary stenosis before TAVR. Aortic valve stenosis is the most common valvular heart disease among the elderly and it often co-occurs with CAD. TAVR is increasingly considered an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement not only in the elderly population but also in younger and lower-risk patients. The impact of co-existing CAD on clinical outcomes as well as the optimal timing of PCI in TAVR candidates is still unclear and the subject of ongoing randomized trials. Meanwhile, it is common practice in many centers to routinely perform invasive coronary angiography and PCI for significant coronary disease as part of the TAVR workup. While computed tomography angiography has emerged as a possible alternative to the invasive coronary angiography in patients with low pre-test probability for CAD, the value of functional invasive assessment of coronary lesions in the pre-TAVR setting has still to be clarified. Also, there is an increasing interest in the clinical relevance and optimal management of the potentially challenging coronary access post-TAVR, requiring further research.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review intends to give an up-to-date overview of the current state of evidence in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), focusing on percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) pre-TAVR. RECENT FINDINGS: The recently published ACTIVATION trial is the 1st randomized trial comparing coronary revascularization (PCI) versus medical treatment in patients with significant CAD undergoing TAVR. With the caveat of several major limitations of the trial, the results of this study raised the question about the appropriateness of the common practice to routinely revascularize coronary stenosis before TAVR. Aortic valve stenosis is the most common valvular heart disease among the elderly and it often co-occurs with CAD. TAVR is increasingly considered an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement not only in the elderly population but also in younger and lower-risk patients. The impact of co-existing CAD on clinical outcomes as well as the optimal timing of PCI in TAVR candidates is still unclear and the subject of ongoing randomized trials. Meanwhile, it is common practice in many centers to routinely perform invasive coronary angiography and PCI for significant coronary disease as part of the TAVR workup. While computed tomography angiography has emerged as a possible alternative to the invasive coronary angiography in patients with low pre-test probability for CAD, the value of functional invasive assessment of coronary lesions in the pre-TAVR setting has still to be clarified. Also, there is an increasing interest in the clinical relevance and optimal management of the potentially challenging coronary access post-TAVR, requiring further research.
Authors: Martin B Leon; Craig R Smith; Michael Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; David L Brown; Peter C Block; Robert A Guyton; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Pamela S Douglas; John L Petersen; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart Pocock Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Giulio G Stefanini; Stefan Stortecky; Davide Cao; Julie Rat-Wirtzler; Crochan J O'Sullivan; Steffen Gloekler; Lutz Buellesfeld; Ahmed A Khattab; Fabian Nietlispach; Thomas Pilgrim; Christoph Huber; Thierry Carrel; Bernhard Meier; Peter Jüni; Peter Wenaweser; Stephan Windecker Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Axel Linke; Peter Wenaweser; Ulrich Gerckens; Corrado Tamburino; Johan Bosmans; Sabine Bleiziffer; Daniel Blackman; Ulrich Schäfer; Ralf Müller; Horst Sievert; Lars Søndergaard; Silvio Klugmann; Rainer Hoffmann; Didier Tchétché; Antonio Colombo; Victor M Legrand; Francesco Bedogni; Pascal lePrince; Gerhard Schuler; Domenico Mazzitelli; Christos Eftychiou; Christian Frerker; Peter Boekstegers; Stephan Windecker; Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr; Felix Woitek; Rüdiger Lange; Robert Bauernschmitt; Stephen Brecker Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; Michael J Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; Mathew Williams; Todd Dewey; Samir Kapadia; Vasilis Babaliaros; Vinod H Thourani; Paul Corso; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart J Pocock Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David H Adams; Jeffrey J Popma; Michael J Reardon; Steven J Yakubov; Joseph S Coselli; G Michael Deeb; Thomas G Gleason; Maurice Buchbinder; James Hermiller; Neal S Kleiman; Stan Chetcuti; John Heiser; William Merhi; George Zorn; Peter Tadros; Newell Robinson; George Petrossian; G Chad Hughes; J Kevin Harrison; John Conte; Brijeshwar Maini; Mubashir Mumtaz; Sharla Chenoweth; Jae K Oh Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-03-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Olaf Wendler; Gerhard Schymik; Hendrik Treede; Helmut Baumgartner; Nicolas Dumonteil; Leo Ihlberg; Franz-Josef Neumann; Giuseppe Tarantini; José Luis Zamarano; Alec Vahanian Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Vuyisile T Nkomo; Julius M Gardin; Thomas N Skelton; John S Gottdiener; Christopher G Scott; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-09-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Christian W Hamm; Helge Möllmann; David Holzhey; Andreas Beckmann; Christof Veit; Hans-Reiner Figulla; J Cremer; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Rüdiger Lange; Ralf Zahn; Stefan Sack; Gerhard Schuler; Thomas Walther; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Michael Böhm; Gerd Heusch; Anne-Kathrin Funkat; Thomas Meinertz; Till Neumann; Konstantinos Papoutsis; Steffen Schneider; Armin Welz; Friedrich W Mohr Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: F D'Ascenzo; F Conrotto; F Giordana; C Moretti; M D'Amico; S Salizzoni; P Omedè; M La Torre; M Thomas; Z Khawaja; D Hildick-Smith; Gp Ussia; M Barbanti; C Tamburino; John Webb; R B Schnabel; M Seiffert; S Wilde; H Treede; V Gasparetto; M Napodano; G Tarantini; P Presbitero; M Mennuni; M L Rossi; M Gasparini; G Biondi Zoccai; M Lupo; M Rinaldi; F Gaita; S Marra Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2013-04-28 Impact factor: 4.164