Matthew W Sherwood1, Amit N Vora2. 1. Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, 3300 Gallows Rd. 1st floor Suite 1225, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA. Matthew.sherwood@inova.org. 2. Duke Clinical Research Institute, 2400 Pratt Street, P.O. Box 17969, Durham, NC, 27715, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to describe the current evidence and consensus recommendations around antiplatelet and anticoagulant management in three common clinical scenarios in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): (1) recent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) preceding TAVR, (2) atrial fibrillation (AF) management in patients undergoing TAVR, and (3) bioprosthetic valve thrombosis management in TAVR. RECENT FINDINGS: Several small clinical trials have evaluated the use of single vs. dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing TAVR, with most recent data favoring single antiplatelet therapy. There are several trials currently enrolling and in follow-up that evaluate the use of anticoagulants in combination with single and dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with AF undergoing TAVR, but as yet, there is no data to support a clear strategy. The use of DAPT after PCI continues to potentially shorten in patients undergoing elective PCI, thus prolonged DAPT may not be necessary post TAVR for the sake of PCI. Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis occurs more commonly than previously thought, but has uncertain clinical significance. In observational studies, antiplatelet therapy has little effect on bioprosthetic valve thrombosis, whereas anticoagulation is effective in both prevention and treatment of thrombosis. DAPT is currently recommended for 1-6 months for all patients without an indication for oral anticoagulation who undergo TAVR; however, there is a growing amount of evidence for single antiplatelet therapy. In the special situation of patients who have recently undergone PCI, the length of DAPT will depend on stent selection (BMS vs. DES), but may not be significantly prolonged unless the patient experienced an acute coronary syndrome prior to TAVR. There is no clear, optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with AF who undergo TAVR, but avoidance of triple therapy by using OAC and low-dose ASA seems to be reasonable. OAC, not DAPT, is now known to prevent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis in TAVR and SAVR patients; however, the optimal therapy remains unknown. For patients who develop bioprosthetic valve thrombosis, OAC for 3-6 months, and repeat imaging is recommended to document resolution.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to describe the current evidence and consensus recommendations around antiplatelet and anticoagulant management in three common clinical scenarios in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): (1) recent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) preceding TAVR, (2) atrial fibrillation (AF) management in patients undergoing TAVR, and (3) bioprosthetic valve thrombosis management in TAVR. RECENT FINDINGS: Several small clinical trials have evaluated the use of single vs. dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing TAVR, with most recent data favoring single antiplatelet therapy. There are several trials currently enrolling and in follow-up that evaluate the use of anticoagulants in combination with single and dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with AF undergoing TAVR, but as yet, there is no data to support a clear strategy. The use of DAPT after PCI continues to potentially shorten in patients undergoing elective PCI, thus prolonged DAPT may not be necessary post TAVR for the sake of PCI. Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis occurs more commonly than previously thought, but has uncertain clinical significance. In observational studies, antiplatelet therapy has little effect on bioprosthetic valve thrombosis, whereas anticoagulation is effective in both prevention and treatment of thrombosis. DAPT is currently recommended for 1-6 months for all patients without an indication for oral anticoagulation who undergo TAVR; however, there is a growing amount of evidence for single antiplatelet therapy. In the special situation of patients who have recently undergone PCI, the length of DAPT will depend on stent selection (BMS vs. DES), but may not be significantly prolonged unless the patient experienced an acute coronary syndrome prior to TAVR. There is no clear, optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with AF who undergo TAVR, but avoidance of triple therapy by using OAC and low-dose ASA seems to be reasonable. OAC, not DAPT, is now known to prevent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis in TAVR and SAVR patients; however, the optimal therapy remains unknown. For patients who develop bioprosthetic valve thrombosis, OAC for 3-6 months, and repeat imaging is recommended to document resolution.
Authors: Fausto Feres; Ricardo A Costa; Alexandre Abizaid; Martin B Leon; J Antônio Marin-Neto; Roberto V Botelho; Spencer B King; Manuela Negoita; Minglei Liu; J Eduardo T de Paula; José A Mangione; George X Meireles; Hélio J Castello; Eduardo L Nicolela; Marco A Perin; Fernando S Devito; André Labrunie; Décio Salvadori; Marcos Gusmão; Rodolfo Staico; J Ribamar Costa; Juliana P de Castro; Andrea S Abizaid; Deepak L Bhatt Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; Michael J Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; Mathew Williams; Todd Dewey; Samir Kapadia; Vasilis Babaliaros; Vinod H Thourani; Paul Corso; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart J Pocock Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amit N Vora; Dadi Dai; Roland Matsuoka; J Kevin Harrison; G Chad Hughes; Matthew W Sherwood; Jonathan P Piccini; Bhaskar Bhardwaj; Renato D Lopes; David Cohen; David R Holmes; Vinod H Thourani; Eric Peterson; Ajay Kirtane; Samir Kapadia; Sreekanth Vemulapalli Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Marina Urena; Salim Hayek; Asim N Cheema; Vicenç Serra; Ignacio J Amat-Santos; Luis Nombela-Franco; Henrique B Ribeiro; Ricardo Allende; Jean-Michel Paradis; Eric Dumont; Vinod H Thourani; Vasilis Babaliaros; Jaume Francisco Pascual; Carlos Cortés; Bruno García Del Blanco; François Philippon; Stamatios Lerakis; Josep Rodés-Cabau Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Stefanie Schulz-Schüpke; Robert A Byrne; Jurrien M Ten Berg; Franz-Josef Neumann; Yaling Han; Tom Adriaenssens; Ralph Tölg; Melchior Seyfarth; Michael Maeng; Bernhard Zrenner; Claudius Jacobshagen; Harald Mudra; Eberhard von Hodenberg; Jochen Wöhrle; Dominick J Angiolillo; Barbara von Merzljak; Nonglag Rifatov; Sebastian Kufner; Tanja Morath; Antonia Feuchtenberger; Tareq Ibrahim; Paul W A Janssen; Christian Valina; Yi Li; Walter Desmet; Mohamed Abdel-Wahab; Klaus Tiroch; Christian Hengstenberg; Isabell Bernlochner; Marcus Fischer; Heribert Schunkert; Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz; Albert Schömig; Julinda Mehilli; Adnan Kastrati Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Matthew W Sherwood; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; John Kevin Harrison; David Dai; Amit N Vora; Michael J Mack; David R Holmes; John S Rumsfeld; David J Cohen; Vinod H Thourani; Ajay Kirtane; Eric D Peterson Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Alexander C Egbe; Sorin V Pislaru; Patricia A Pellikka; Joseph T Poterucha; Hartzell V Schaff; Joseph J Maleszewski; Heidi M Connolly Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 24.094