Literature DB >> 26914704

The prognostic impact of TERT promoter mutations in glioblastomas is modified by the rs2853669 single nucleotide polymorphism.

Rui Batista1,2, Adriana Cruvinel-Carloni3, João Vinagre1,2,4, Joana Peixoto1,2, Telmo A Catarino1,2, Nathalia Cristina Campanella3, Weder Menezes3, Aline Paixão Becker3,5, Gisele Caravina de Almeida6, Marcus M Matsushita6, Carlos Clara7, Luciano Neder5, Marta Viana-Pereira8,9, Mrinalini Honavar10, Lígia Castro11, José Manuel Lopes11, Bruno Carvalho12,13, Rui Manuel Vaz12,13,14, Valdemar Máximo1,2,13, Paula Soares1,2,13, Manuel Sobrinho-Simões1,2,11,13, Rui Manuel Reis3,8,9, Jorge Lima1,2,13.   

Abstract

Human hotspot TERT promoter (TERTp) mutations have been reported in a wide range of tumours. Several studies have shown that TERTp mutations are associated with clinicopathological features; in some instances, TERTp mutations were considered as biomarkers of poor prognosis. The rs2853669 SNP, located in the TERT promoter region, was reported to modulate the increased TERT expression levels induced by the recurrent somatic mutations. In this study we aimed to determine the frequency and prognostic value of TERTp mutations and TERT rs2853669 SNP in 504 gliomas from Portuguese and Brazilian patients. TERTp mutations were detected in 47.8% of gliomas (216/452). Glioblastomas (GBM) exhibited the highest frequency of TERTp mutations (66.9%); in this glioma subtype, we found a significant association between TERTp mutations and poor prognosis, regardless of the population. Moreover, in a multivariate analysis, TERTp mutations were the only independent prognostic factor. Our data also showed that the poor prognosis conferred by TERTp mutations was restricted to GBM patients carrying the rs2853669 A allele and not in those carrying the G allele. In conclusion, the presence of TERTp mutations was associated with worse prognosis in GBM patients, although such association depended on the status of the rs2853669 SNP. The status of the rs2853669 SNP should be taken in consideration when assessing the prognostic value of TERTp mutations in GBM patients. TERTp mutations and the rs2853669 SNP can be used in the future as biomarkers of glioma prognosis.
© 2016 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TERT SNP; TERT promoter mutations; glioblastoma; prognosis; survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26914704     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  27 in total

1.  Low MGMT digital expression is associated with a better outcome of IDH1 wildtype glioblastomas treated with temozolomide.

Authors:  Isabella Gomes; Daniel Antunes Moreno; Mariana Bisarro Dos Reis; Luciane Sussuchi da Silva; Letícia Ferro Leal; Gisele Melo Gonçalves; Caio Augusto Pereira; Marco Antônio Oliveira; Marcus de Medeiros Matsushita; Rui Manuel Reis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  When the Ends Are Really the Beginnings: Targeting Telomerase for Treatment of GBM.

Authors:  Saumya R Bollam; Michael E Berens; Harshil D Dhruv
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Replication of GWAS identifies RTEL1, CDKN2A/B, and PHLDB1 SNPs as risk factors in Portuguese gliomas patients.

Authors:  Marta Viana-Pereira; Daniel Antunes Moreno; Paulo Linhares; Júlia Amorim; Rui Nabiço; Sandra Costa; Rui Vaz; Rui Manuel Reis
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 4.  Prognostic significance of TERT promoter mutations in adult-type diffuse gliomas.

Authors:  Hideyuki Arita; Koichi Ichimura
Journal:  Brain Tumor Pathol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.298

5.  TERT promoter mutations are associated with poor prognosis and cell immortalization in meningioma.

Authors:  Sabine Spiegl-Kreinecker; Daniela Lötsch; Katharina Neumayer; Lucia Kastler; Johannes Gojo; Christine Pirker; Josef Pichler; Serge Weis; Rajiv Kumar; Gerald Webersinke; Andreas Gruber; Walter Berger
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Molecular Mechanism of Telomere Length Dynamics and Its Prognostic Value in Pediatric Cancers.

Authors:  Zhaoming Wang; Stephen V Rice; Ti-Cheng Chang; Yu Liu; Qi Liu; Na Qin; Daniel K Putnam; Kyla Shelton; Jennifer Q Lanctot; Carmen L Wilson; Kirsten K Ness; Michael C Rusch; Michael N Edmonson; Gang Wu; John Easton; Chimene A Kesserwan; James R Downing; Xiang Chen; Kim E Nichols; Yutaka Yasui; Leslie L Robison; Jinghui Zhang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 11.816

7.  Copy Number Profiling of Brazilian Astrocytomas.

Authors:  Lucas Tadeu Bidinotto; Raul Torrieri; Alan Mackay; Gisele Caravina Almeida; Marta Viana-Pereira; Adriana Cruvinel-Carloni; Maria Luisa Spina; Nathalia Cristina Campanella; Weder Pereira de Menezes; Carlos Afonso Clara; Aline Paixão Becker; Chris Jones; Rui Manuel Reis
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 8.  Transcription Regulation of the Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (hTERT) Gene.

Authors:  Muhammad Khairul Ramlee; Jing Wang; Wei Xun Toh; Shang Li
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 9.  The Role of ATRX in the Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres (ALT) Phenotype.

Authors:  João P Amorim; Gustavo Santos; João Vinagre; Paula Soares
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 10.  Human Specific Regulation of the Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Gene.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; De Cheng; Shuwen Wang; Jiyue Zhu
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.