BACKGROUND: We aimed to systematically evaluate telomere dynamics across a spectrum of pediatric cancers, search for underlying molecular mechanisms, and assess potential prognostic value. METHODS: The fraction of telomeric reads was determined from whole-genome sequencing data for paired tumor and normal samples from 653 patients with 23 cancer types from the Pediatric Cancer Genome Project. Telomere dynamics were characterized as the ratio of telomere fractions between tumor and normal samples. Somatic mutations were gathered, RNA sequencing data for 330 patients were analyzed for gene expression, and Cox regression was used to assess the telomere dynamics on patient survival. RESULTS: Telomere lengthening was observed in 28.7% of solid tumors, 10.5% of brain tumors, and 4.3% of hematological cancers. Among 81 samples with telomere lengthening, 26 had somatic mutations in alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked gene, corroborated by a low level of the gene expression in the subset of tumors with RNA sequencing. Telomerase reverse transcriptase gene amplification and/or activation was observed in 10 tumors with telomere lengthening, including two leukemias of the E2A-PBX1 subtype. Among hematological cancers, pathway analysis for genes with expressions most negatively correlated with telomere fractions suggests the implication of a gene ontology process of antigen presentation by Major histocompatibility complex class II. A higher ratio of telomere fractions was statistically significantly associated with poorer survival for patients with brain tumors (hazard ratio = 2.18, 95% confidence interval = 1.37 to 3.46). CONCLUSION: Because telomerase inhibitors are currently being explored as potential agents to treat pediatric cancer, these data are valuable because they identify a subpopulation of patients with reactivation of telomerase who are most likely to benefit from this novel therapeutic option.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to systematically evaluate telomere dynamics across a spectrum of pediatric cancers, search for underlying molecular mechanisms, and assess potential prognostic value. METHODS: The fraction of telomeric reads was determined from whole-genome sequencing data for paired tumor and normal samples from 653 patients with 23 cancer types from the Pediatric Cancer Genome Project. Telomere dynamics were characterized as the ratio of telomere fractions between tumor and normal samples. Somatic mutations were gathered, RNA sequencing data for 330 patients were analyzed for gene expression, and Cox regression was used to assess the telomere dynamics on patient survival. RESULTS: Telomere lengthening was observed in 28.7% of solid tumors, 10.5% of brain tumors, and 4.3% of hematological cancers. Among 81 samples with telomere lengthening, 26 had somatic mutations in alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked gene, corroborated by a low level of the gene expression in the subset of tumors with RNA sequencing. Telomerase reverse transcriptase gene amplification and/or activation was observed in 10 tumors with telomere lengthening, including two leukemias of the E2A-PBX1 subtype. Among hematological cancers, pathway analysis for genes with expressions most negatively correlated with telomere fractions suggests the implication of a gene ontology process of antigen presentation by Major histocompatibility complex class II. A higher ratio of telomere fractions was statistically significantly associated with poorer survival for patients with brain tumors (hazard ratio = 2.18, 95% confidence interval = 1.37 to 3.46). CONCLUSION: Because telomerase inhibitors are currently being explored as potential agents to treat pediatric cancer, these data are valuable because they identify a subpopulation of patients with reactivation of telomerase who are most likely to benefit from this novel therapeutic option.
Authors: Robert L Dilley; Priyanka Verma; Nam Woo Cho; Harrison D Winters; Anne R Wondisford; Roger A Greenberg Journal: Nature Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ayalew Tefferi; Terra L Lasho; Kebede H Begna; Mrinal M Patnaik; Darci L Zblewski; Christy M Finke; Rebecca R Laborde; Emnet Wassie; Lauren Schimek; Curtis A Hanson; Naseema Gangat; Xiaolin Wang; Animesh Pardanani Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kathleen Dorris; Matthew Sobo; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Eshini Panditharatna; Charles B Stevenson; Sharon L Gardner; Mariko D Dewire; Christopher R Pierson; Randal Olshefski; Sandra A Rempel; Stewart Goldman; Lili Miles; Maryam Fouladi; Rachid Drissi Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Matthew Parker; Xiang Chen; Armita Bahrami; James Dalton; Michael Rusch; Gang Wu; John Easton; Nai-Kong Cheung; Michael Dyer; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; Charles Mullighan; Richard Gilbertson; Suzanne J Baker; Gerard Zambetti; David W Ellison; James R Downing; Jinghui Zhang Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2012-12-11 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Shannon S Cigan; John J Meredith; Ava C Kelley; Tianzhong Yang; Erica K Langer; Anthony J Hooten; John A Lane; Benjamin R Cole; Mark Krailo; A Lindsay Frazier; Nathan Pankratz; Jenny N Poynter Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2022-04-02 Impact factor: 9.075