Sabine Spiegl-Kreinecker1, Daniela Lötsch2, Katharina Neumayer1, Lucia Kastler1, Johannes Gojo3, Christine Pirker2, Josef Pichler4, Serge Weis5, Rajiv Kumar6, Gerald Webersinke7, Andreas Gruber1, Walter Berger2. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Neuromed Campus, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria. 2. Institute of Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 3. Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Neuromed Campus, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria. 5. Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Neuromed Campus, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria. 6. Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany. 7. Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Tumorcytogenetics, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria.
Abstract
Background: Meningiomas are mostly benign tumors tending to progress to higher-grade lesions. Mutations in the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene promoter are comparably rare in meningioma, but were recently suggested to predict risk of recurrence and progression. Here we have analyzed a cohort of World Health Organization grades I-III meningiomas regarding the impact of TERT promoter mutations on patient prognosis and in vitro cell propagation feasibility. Methods: From 110 meningioma patients, 128 tissue samples were analyzed for the TERT promoter mutations C228T and C250T by direct sequencing. Of the 128 samples, 121 were tested for cell propagation in vitro. Telomerase activity, TERT mRNA expression, and telomere lengths were investigated by telomeric repeat amplification protocol assay, reverse transcription PCR, and quantitative PCR, respectively. Impact of the E-twenty-six (ETS) transcription factor inhibitor YK-4-279 on cell viability and TERT promoter activity was analyzed. Results: TERT promoter mutations were found in 5.5% of all samples analyzed and were associated with a significantly upregulated telomerase activity and TERT mRNA expression (P < 0.0001 both). Regarding telomere lengths, no significant difference between the TERT promoter wild-type and mutated subgroups was detected. Patients with TERT promoter mutated tumors exhibited significantly shorter overall survival (P = 0.0006; 53.8 vs 115.6 mo). The presence of TERT promoter mutations but not telomerase activity or TERT mRNA expression predicted indefinite cell growth in vitro. TERT promoter mutated meningioma cells were hypersensitive against the ETS transcription factor inhibitor YK-4-279, inducing a distinct downregulation of TERT promoter activity. Conclusion: TERT promoter mutations drive meningioma aggressiveness, resulting in reduced patient survival, but might also open novel therapeutic options for progressive disease.
Background: Meningiomas are mostly benign tumors tending to progress to higher-grade lesions. Mutations in the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene promoter are comparably rare in meningioma, but were recently suggested to predict risk of recurrence and progression. Here we have analyzed a cohort of World Health Organization grades I-III meningiomas regarding the impact of TERT promoter mutations on patient prognosis and in vitro cell propagation feasibility. Methods: From 110 meningiomapatients, 128 tissue samples were analyzed for the TERT promoter mutations C228T and C250T by direct sequencing. Of the 128 samples, 121 were tested for cell propagation in vitro. Telomerase activity, TERT mRNA expression, and telomere lengths were investigated by telomeric repeat amplification protocol assay, reverse transcription PCR, and quantitative PCR, respectively. Impact of the E-twenty-six (ETS) transcription factor inhibitor YK-4-279 on cell viability and TERT promoter activity was analyzed. Results:TERT promoter mutations were found in 5.5% of all samples analyzed and were associated with a significantly upregulated telomerase activity and TERT mRNA expression (P < 0.0001 both). Regarding telomere lengths, no significant difference between the TERT promoter wild-type and mutated subgroups was detected. Patients with TERT promoter mutated tumors exhibited significantly shorter overall survival (P = 0.0006; 53.8 vs 115.6 mo). The presence of TERT promoter mutations but not telomerase activity or TERT mRNA expression predicted indefinite cell growth in vitro. TERT promoter mutated meningioma cells were hypersensitive against the ETS transcription factor inhibitor YK-4-279, inducing a distinct downregulation of TERT promoter activity. Conclusion:TERT promoter mutations drive meningioma aggressiveness, resulting in reduced patient survival, but might also open novel therapeutic options for progressive disease.
Authors: David N Louis; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Webster K Cavenee; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Paul Kleihues; David W Ellison Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Pedro Castelo-Branco; Sanaa Choufani; Stephen Mack; Denis Gallagher; Cindy Zhang; Tatiana Lipman; Nataliya Zhukova; Erin J Walker; Dianna Martin; Diana Merino; Jonathan D Wasserman; Cynthia Elizabeth; Noa Alon; Libo Zhang; Volker Hovestadt; Marcel Kool; David T W Jones; Gelareh Zadeh; Sidney Croul; Cynthia Hawkins; Johann Hitzler; Jean C Y Wang; Sylvain Baruchel; Peter B Dirks; David Malkin; Stefan Pfister; Michael D Taylor; Rosanna Weksberg; Uri Tabori Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: L Boldrini; S Pistolesi; S Gisfredi; S Ursino; G Lupi; M Caniglia; R Pingitore; F Basolo; G Parenti; G Fontanini Journal: Int J Mol Med Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 4.101
Authors: Felix Sahm; Daniel Schrimpf; Adriana Olar; Christian Koelsche; David Reuss; Juliane Bissel; Annekathrin Kratz; David Capper; Sebastian Schefzyk; Thomas Hielscher; Qianghu Wang; Erik P Sulman; Sebastian Adeberg; Arend Koch; Ali Fuat Okuducu; Stefanie Brehmer; Jens Schittenhelm; Albert Becker; Benjamin Brokinkel; Melissa Schmidt; Theresa Ull; Konstantinos Gousias; Almuth Friederike Kessler; Katrin Lamszus; Jürgen Debus; Christian Mawrin; Yoo-Jin Kim; Matthias Simon; Ralf Ketter; Werner Paulus; Kenneth D Aldape; Christel Herold-Mende; Andreas von Deimling Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-12-13 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Tareq A Juratli; Christian Thiede; Mara V A Koerner; Shilpa S Tummala; Dirk Daubner; Ganesh M Shankar; Erik A Williams; Maria Martinez-Lage; Silke Soucek; Katja Robel; Tristan Penson; Mechthild Krause; Steffen Appold; Matthias Meinhardt; Thomas Pinzer; Julie J Miller; Dietmar Krex; Heather A Ely; Ian M Silverman; Jason Christiansen; Gabriele Schackert; Hiroaki Wakimoto; Matthias Kirsch; Priscilla K Brastianos; Daniel P Cahill Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-11-24
Authors: S Spiegl-Kreinecker; C Pirker; C Marosi; J Buchroithner; J Pichler; R Silye; J Fischer; M Micksche; W Berger Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2007-03-06 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Daniela Lötsch; Elisabeth Steiner; Klaus Holzmann; Sabine Spiegl-Kreinecker; Christine Pirker; Juraj Hlavaty; Helga Petznek; Balazs Hegedus; Tamas Garay; Thomas Mohr; Wolfgang Sommergruber; Michael Grusch; Walter Berger Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2013-11
Authors: Victor M Lu; Anshit Goyal; Adrian Lee; Mark Jentoft; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Kaisorn L Chaichana Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Mark W Youngblood; Danielle F Miyagishima; Lan Jin; Trisha Gupte; Chang Li; Daniel Duran; Julio D Montejo; Amy Zhao; Amar Sheth; Evgeniya Tyrtova; Koray Özduman; Francesco Iacoangeli; Matthieu Peyre; Julien Boetto; Matthew Pease; Timuçin Avşar; Anita Huttner; Kaya Bilguvar; Türker Kilic; M Necmettin Pamir; Nduka Amankulor; Michel Kalamarides; E Zeynep Erson-Omay; Murat Günel; Jennifer Moliterno Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Felix Behling; Christina Fodi; Marco Skardelly; Frank Paulsen; Ghazaleh Tabatabai; Jürgen Honegger; Marcos Tatagiba; Jens Schittenhelm Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 4.322
Authors: Stephen T Magill; Charlotte D Eaton; Abrar Choudhury; Briana C Prager; William C Chen; Martha A Cady; Kyounghee Seo; Calixto-Hope G Lucas; Tim J Casey-Clyde; Harish N Vasudevan; S John Liu; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Tai-Chung Lam; Jenny Kan-Suen Pu; Lai-Fung Li; Gilberto Ka-Kit Leung; Danielle L Swaney; Michael Y Zhang; Jason W Chan; Zhixin Qiu; Michael V Martin; Matthew S Susko; Steve E Braunstein; Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush; Jessica D Schulte; Nicholas Butowski; Penny K Sneed; Mitchel S Berger; Nevan J Krogan; Arie Perry; Joanna J Phillips; David A Solomon; Joseph F Costello; Michael W McDermott; Jeremy N Rich; David R Raleigh Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 41.307
Authors: Matthias Preusser; Antonio Silvani; Emilie Le Rhun; Riccardo Soffietti; Giuseppe Lombardi; Juan Manuel Sepulveda; Petter Brandal; Lucy Brazil; Alice Bonneville-Levard; Veronique Lorgis; Elodie Vauleon; Jacoline Bromberg; Sara Erridge; Alison Cameron; Florence Lefranc; Paul M Clement; Sarah Dumont; Marc Sanson; Charlotte Bronnimann; Carmen Balaná; Niklas Thon; Joanne Lewis; Maximilian J Mair; Philipp Sievers; Julia Furtner; Josef Pichler; Jordi Bruna; Francois Ducray; Jaap C Reijneveld; Christian Mawrin; Martin Bendszus; Christine Marosi; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Corneel Coens; Thierry Gorlia; Michael Weller; Felix Sahm; Wolfgang Wick Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2022-05-04 Impact factor: 13.029
Authors: So Yeon Won; Jun Ho Lee; Narae Lee; Yae Won Park; Sung Soo Ahn; Jinna Kim; Jong Hee Chang; Se Hoon Kim; Seung-Koo Lee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-10-20 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Gavin R Oliver; Sofia Marcano-Bonilla; Jonathan Quist; Ezequiel J Tolosa; Eriko Iguchi; Amy A Swanson; Nicole L Hoppman; Tanya Schwab; Ashley Sigafoos; Naresh Prodduturi; Jesse S Voss; Shannon M Knight; Jin Zhang; Numrah Fadra; Raul Urrutia; Michael Zimmerman; Jan B Egan; Anthony G Bilyeu; Jin Jen; Ema Veras; Rema'a Al-Safi; Matthew Block; Sarah Kerr; Martin E Fernandez-Zapico; John K Schoolmeester; Eric W Klee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 3.240