Literature DB >> 26912935

The influence of contraception, abortion, and natural family planning on divorce rates as found in the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth.

Richard J Fehring1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of contraception, abortion, and natural family planning (NFP) on divorce rates of US women of reproductive age. The variables of importance of religion and frequency of church attendance were also included in the analysis. The study involved 5,530 reproductive age women in the (2006-2010) National Survey of Family Growth who indicate that they were ever married. Among the women who ever used NFP only 9.6 percent were currently divorced compared with the 14.4 percent who were currently divorced among the women who never used NFP (x (2) = 5.34, P < 0.21). Odds ratio analysis indicated that ever having an abortion, sterilization, and/or methods of contraception increased the likelihood of divorce - up to two times. Frequency of church attendance decreased the risk of divorce. Although there is less divorce among NFP users the reason might be due to their religiosity. Lay summary: Providers of natural family planning (NFP) frequently mention that couples who practice NFP have fewer divorces compared to couples who use contraception. Evidence for this comment is weak. This study utilized a large data set of 5,530 reproductive age women to determine the influence that contraception, sterilization, abortion, and NFP has on divorce rates. Among the women participants who ever used NFP only 9.6 percent were currently divorced compared with the 14.4 percent who used methods of contraception, sterilization or abortion as a family planning method. Frequency of church attendance also reduced the likelihood of divorce.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Divorce; Marriage; Natural family planning

Year:  2015        PMID: 26912935      PMCID: PMC4536625          DOI: 10.1179/2050854915Y.0000000007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  12 in total

1.  Couples' views of the effects of natural family planning on marital dynamics.

Authors:  Leona Vande Vusse; Lisa Hanson; Richard J Fehring; Amy Newman; Jaime Fox
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.176

2.  The association of religiosity, sexual education, and parental factors with risky sexual behaviors among adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Kristin A Haglund; Richard J Fehring
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2009-06-30

3.  Religiosity and sexual risk behaviors among Latina adolescents: trends from 1995 to 2008.

Authors:  Lisa M Edwards; Kristin Haglund; Richard J Fehring; Jessica Pruszynski
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Spiritual Care of Couples Practicing Natural Family Planning.

Authors:  Richard J Fehring; Dana Rodriguez
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2013-08-01

5.  Analysis of a representative sample of natural family planning users in England and Wales, 1984-1985.

Authors:  M von Fragstein; A Flynn; P Royston
Journal:  Int J Fertil       Date:  1988

6.  Women's satisfaction with birth control: a population survey of physical and psychological effects of oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, condoms, natural family planning, and sterilization among 1466 women.

Authors:  B J Oddens
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptive use modulate human brain structure.

Authors:  Belinda Pletzer; Martin Kronbichler; Markus Aichhorn; Jürgen Bergmann; Gunther Ladurner; Hubert H Kerschbaum
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-13       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Prevalence of low sexual desire and hypoactive sexual desire disorder in a nationally representative sample of US women.

Authors:  Suzanne L West; Aimee A D'Aloisio; Robert P Agans; William D Kalsbeek; Natalie N Borisov; John M Thorp
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-14

Review 9.  Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans?

Authors:  Alexandra Alvergne; Virpi Lummaa
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  Family Planning, Natural Family Planning, and Abortion Use among U.S. Hispanic Women: Analysis of Data from Cycle 7 of the National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Dana Rodriguez; Richard J Fehring
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2012-05-01
View more
  5 in total

1.  The State of the Science of Natural Family Planning Fifty Years after Humane Vitae: A Report from NFP Scientists' Meeting Held at the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, April 4, 2018.

Authors:  Michael D Manhart; Richard J Fehring
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2018-11-28

2.  Anthropological and Methodical Differences of Natural Family Planning and Fertility Awareness-based Methods.

Authors:  Birutė Obelenienė; Andrius Narbekovas; Jonas Juškevičius
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2019-11-22

3.  Natural Family Planning and Marital Chastity: The Effects of Periodic Abstinence on Marital Relationships.

Authors:  Richard J Fehring; Michael D Manhart
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2020-06-12

4.  "Man Cannot Exist Alone": The Challenge of Health Care to Honor the Role of Women in Society.

Authors:  Jonathan Scrafford
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2018-11-28

5.  Marital Functioning in Couples Practicing Periodic Abstinence for Family Planning.

Authors:  Sergio Barroilhet; Camila Señoret; Ximena Mallea; Rosemarie Fritsch; Paul Vöhringer; José-Antonio Arraztoa
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2018-04-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.