Literature DB >> 32431371

The State of the Science of Natural Family Planning Fifty Years after Humane Vitae: A Report from NFP Scientists' Meeting Held at the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, April 4, 2018.

Michael D Manhart1, Richard J Fehring2.   

Abstract

A one-day meeting of physicians, professional nurses, and scientists actively involved in Natural Family Planning (NFP) research was held to review the state of the science of NFP and consider future priorities. The meeting had four objectives: (i) determine the gaps in research evidence for secure methods of NFP among women of all reproductive categories, (ii) determine the gaps in the research and development of new technology for providing NFP services, (iii) determine the gaps in the research that determine the benefits and challenges with use of NFP among married couples, and (iv) provide prioritized ideas for future research needs from the analysis of evidence gaps from objectives above. This article summarizes the discussion and conclusions drawn from topics reviewed. While much has been accomplished in the fifty years since Humane vitae, there are still many gaps to address. Five areas for future research in NFP were identified as high priority: (1) well-designed method effectiveness studies among various reproductive categories including important subpopulations (postpartum, perimenopause, posthormonal contraceptive), normally cycling women (especially US women), and comparative studies between NFP methods; (2) validation studies to establish the benefit of charting fertility signs (both currently known and potential new indicators) as a screening tool for women's health issues; (3) ongoing independent evaluation of fertility monitoring apps to provide users perspective on the relative merits of each and to identify those most worthy of further effectiveness testing; (4) studies evaluating the impact of new technologies on NFP adoption, use, and persistence; and (5) creation of a shared database across various NFP methods to collaborate on shared research interests, longitudinal studies, and so on. This summarizes a meeting to review the scientific and medical progress related to natural family planning made in the 50 years since Humane Vitae and to define priorities for future work. Areas reviewed included the evidence for avoiding pregnancy in normally cycling, postpartum, and perimenopausal women, the impact of new technology, including fertility charting apps, on NFP, and the impact on relationships and personal well-being from use of NFP. Five priority focus areas for future research were also identified. © Catholic Medical Association 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fertility awareness; Fertility awareness information technology; Humane vitae; Marriage and family; NFP; Reproductive technology; Sexuality and marriage

Year:  2018        PMID: 32431371      PMCID: PMC6322122          DOI: 10.1177/0024363918809699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  16 in total

1.  Defining dimensions of pregnancy intendedness.

Authors:  J B Stanford; R Hobbs; P Jameson; M J DeWitt; R C Fischer
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-09

2.  Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature.

Authors:  Mark H Ebell; Jay Siwek; Barry D Weiss; Steven H Woolf; Jeffrey Susman; Bernard Ewigman; Marjorie Bowman
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 3.292

3.  The Performance of Fertility Awareness-based Method Apps Marketed to Avoid Pregnancy.

Authors:  Marguerite Duane; Alison Contreras; Elizabeth T Jensen; Amina White
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  Self-identification of the clinical fertile window and the ovulation period.

Authors:  Rene Ecochard; Olivia Duterque; Rene Leiva; Thomas Bouchard; Pilar Vigil
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Breastfeeding and the symptothermal method.

Authors:  K I Kennedy; B A Gross; S Parenteau-Carreau; A M Flynn; J B Brown; C M Visness
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr

Review 6.  Fertility awareness-based methods for contraception: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Maria F Gallo; Vera Grigorieva; Kavita Nanda; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Women's Contraceptive Preference-Use Mismatch.

Authors:  Katherine He; Vanessa K Dalton; Melissa K Zochowski; Kelli Stidham Hall
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Racial and ethnic differences in women's preferences for features of contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Andrea V Jackson; Deborah Karasek; Christine Dehlendorf; Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Efficacy of a new postpartum transition protocol for avoiding pregnancy.

Authors:  Thomas Bouchard; Richard J Fehring; Mary Schneider
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

10.  Plausibility of Menstrual Cycle Apps Claiming to Support Conception.

Authors:  Alexander Freis; Tanja Freundl-Schütt; Lisa-Maria Wallwiener; Sigfried Baur; Thomas Strowitzki; Günter Freundl; Petra Frank-Herrmann
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-04-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Knowledge of Fertile Period and Its Determinants Among Women of Childbearing age in Ethiopia: A Multilevel Analysis Based on 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey.

Authors:  Maereg Wolde; Ayenew Kassie; Kegnie Shitu; Zelalem Nigussie Azene
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-19

2.  Anthropological and Methodical Differences of Natural Family Planning and Fertility Awareness-based Methods.

Authors:  Birutė Obelenienė; Andrius Narbekovas; Jonas Juškevičius
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2019-11-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.