Literature DB >> 10494480

Women's satisfaction with birth control: a population survey of physical and psychological effects of oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, condoms, natural family planning, and sterilization among 1466 women.

B J Oddens1.   

Abstract

User satisfaction and the physical and psychological effects of five commonly used contraceptive methods were investigated in a population survey among 1466 West German women. The focus was on effects attributed by current and past users to these methods, rather than objectively assessed effects, to shed further light on personal experiences that are highly relevant to the user but often remain unknown to prescribers and unreported in the medical literature. Within the overall sample, 1303 women were surveyed concerning their current or past use of oral contraceptives (OC), 996 regarding condoms, 342 with respect to intrauterine devices (IUD), 428 in regard to natural family planning (NFP), and 139 in relation to sterilization (respondents completed questions about each method used). It emerged that satisfaction was greatest with sterilization (92% of users), followed by OC (68% of ever users), IUD (59%), NFP (43%), and condoms (30%). Almost one in three NFP users had experienced an unwanted pregnancy during use of this method, as compared with one in 20 OC and condom users. The majority of users reported no mood changes during use of the methods studied. The percentages reporting negative mood changes (various items were scored) were up to 16% among OC users, 23% among condom users, and 30% among NFP users. The latter observations suggested that subjective side effects of a contraceptive agent on mood generally reflected, at least in part, the user's sense of confidence in the method concerned (notably, with regard to efficacy and safety). Oral contraceptives, IUD, and sterilization had a broadly positive impact on sex life, whereas that of condoms was often negative. Whereas OC users often reported less heavy and painful menstruation (in up to 56% of cases), IUD were associated with heavier, prolonged, and more painful menstruation (in up to 65% of cases), as also was sterilization, although to a lesser extent (in up to 32% of cases). Overall, the study findings indicated that OC and sterilization had less negative impact on physical and psychological functioning than the other methods studied, in contrast to what the general public often believes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrier Methods; Behavior; Condom; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Developed Countries; Europe; Family Planning; Family Planning, Behavioral Methods; Germany; Iud; Natural Family Planning; Oral Contraceptives; Psychological Factors; Research Methodology; Research Report; Sampling Studies; Satisfaction--women; Studies; Surveys--women; Western Europe; Women

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10494480     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00034-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  19 in total

1.  Development and validation of an acceptability and satisfaction questionnaire for a contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing.

Authors:  Annoesjka Novák; Christine de la Loge; Linda Abetz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Hormonal contraceptive users' self-reported benefits, adverse reactions, and fears in 2001 and 2007.

Authors:  Miia Tiihonen; Hanna-Mari Leppänen; Anna-Mari Heikkinen; Riitta Ahonen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  The ORTHO BC-SAT--a satisfaction questionnaire for women using hormonal contraceptives.

Authors:  H H Colwell; S D Mathias; T A Cimms; M Rothman; A J Friedman; D L Patrick
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Keyes et Al. Respond to "hormonal contraception and mood".

Authors:  Katherine M Keyes; Keely Cheslack-Postava; Carolyn Westhoff; Christine M Heim; Michelle Haloossim; Kate Walsh; Karestan Koenen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Psychological, social, and spiritual effects of contraceptive steroid hormones.

Authors:  Hanna Klaus; Manuel E Cortés
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2015-08

6.  The influence of contraception, abortion, and natural family planning on divorce rates as found in the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Richard J Fehring
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2015-08

7.  Association of Use of Oral Contraceptives With Depressive Symptoms Among Adolescents and Young Women.

Authors:  Anouk E de Wit; Sanne H Booij; Erik J Giltay; Hadine Joffe; Robert A Schoevers; Albertine J Oldehinkel
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 21.596

8.  Attitudes, awareness, compliance and preferences among hormonal contraception users: a global, cross-sectional, self-administered, online survey.

Authors:  David J Hooper
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

9.  Satisfaction and discontinuation of contraception by contraceptive method among university women.

Authors:  Jennifer L Ersek; Larissa R Brunner Huber; Michael E Thompson; Jan Warren-Findlow
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-05

10.  Benefit-risk assessment of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in contraception.

Authors:  Tiina Backman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.