Literature DB >> 26912237

Bilateral gene interaction hierarchy analysis of the cell death gene response emphasizes the significance of cell cycle genes following unilateral traumatic brain injury.

Todd E White1, Monique C Surles-Zeigler2, Gregory D Ford3, Alicia S Gates4, Benem Davids5, Timothy Distel6,7, Michelle C LaPlaca8, Byron D Ford9,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delayed or secondary cell death that is caused by a cascade of cellular and molecular processes initiated by traumatic brain injury (TBI) may be reduced or prevented if an effective neuroprotective strategy is employed. Microarray and subsequent bioinformatic analyses were used to determine which genes, pathways and networks were significantly altered 24 h after unilateral TBI in the rat. Ipsilateral hemi-brain, the corresponding contralateral hemi-brain, and naïve (control) brain tissue were used for microarray analysis.
RESULTS: Ingenuity Pathway Analysis showed cell death and survival (CD) to be a top molecular and cellular function associated with TBI on both sides of the brain. One major finding was that the overall gene expression pattern suggested an increase in CD genes in ipsilateral brain tissue and suppression of CD genes contralateral to the injury which may indicate an endogenous protective mechanism. We created networks of genes of interest (GOI) and ranked the genes by the number of direct connections each had in the GOI networks, creating gene interaction hierarchies (GIHs). Cell cycle was determined from the resultant GIHs to be a significant molecular and cellular function in post-TBI CD gene response.
CONCLUSIONS: Cell cycle and apoptosis signalling genes that were highly ranked in the GIHs and exhibited either the inverse ipsilateral/contralateral expression pattern or contralateral suppression were identified and included STAT3, CCND1, CCND2, and BAX. Additional exploration into the remote suppression of CD genes may provide insight into neuroprotective mechanisms that could be used to develop therapies to prevent cell death following TBI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26912237      PMCID: PMC4765060          DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-2412-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major public health problem in both the civilian and military populations as TBI has now become a prominent injury in war zones. Of the 1.7 million new TBIs that are sustained annually in the United States [1], 53,000 result in death [2] while an additional 125,000 leave the affected people with long-term behavioral deficits [3]. Overall, about 3 million Americans are currently suffering with chronic effects of TBI [4]. Additionally, it is estimated that 17–30 % of soldiers returning for Iraq and Afghanistan have suffered TBIs [5, 6]. Development of more effective clinical treatments is necessary to reduce the healthcare and financial burden of TBI. Such development requires basic experimentation into the mechanisms underlying TBI. Primary damage to cells by TBI may be irreversible and lead to immediate cell death, however, delayed or secondary cell death that is caused by a cascade of cellular and molecular processes initiated by the trauma [7-10] may be reduced or prevented if an effective neuroprotective strategy is employed. Development of such a strategy requires an understanding of the molecular environment in the injured brain so that deleterious molecules and processes can be identified and inhibited. A step towards understanding the molecular response to TBI is examining gene expression profiles following the injury. Microarray technology allows for examination of thousands of genes in one assay. The key to using this technology is interpreting the resulting gene expression patterns and using the interpreted data to guide further study. The development of advanced bioinformatic analysis tools have aided in deciphering microarray data. One such tool is the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software program which uses a database built from published scientific literature to draw direct and indirect interactions between genes and to assign genes to specific biological functions, canonical pathways, and networks [11]. IPA also features a strong network building component that allows for the creation and analysis of networks composed of any genes of interest (GOI). We have previously devised a method for using the initial information that IPA provides and subsequent network analysis to determine which genes are most significant to the inflammatory response following neuronal injury unilateral controlled cortical impact (CCI) in the rat [12]. This analysis results in a gene interaction hierarchy (GIH) where genes of interest are ranked based on the number of interactions they have with each other. The theory behind the analysis is that a gene that interacts with more genes in a particular set of genes has the potential to influence that set of genes the most. The current study uses gene expression profiling and bioinformatic analysis to examine the cell death gene response 24 h following unilateral CCI. One significant finding of our previous study was that while inflammatory gene expression was induced on the ipsilateral side of the brain following TBI, there was a suppression of inflammatory genes contralateral to the injury [12]. We believe that this endogenous anti-inflammatory response may hold clues for the development of anti-inflammatory treatments for TBI and other acute brain injuries. Inflammation resulting from many different types of acute brain injuries, including TBI and ischemic stroke, has been linked to subsequent neuronal cell death [13-16]. By extension, we believe that understanding the post-TBI expression of genes involved in acute cell death will provide clues for the development of neuroprotective strategies.

Methods

Animals

All animals used in these studies were treated humanely and with regard for alleviation of suffering and pain and all protocols involving animals were approved by the IACUCs of Morehouse School of Medicine and/or The Georgia Institute of Technology prior to the initiation of experimentation. Adult male Sprague–Dawley rats (290–300 g; Charles River Laboratories International, Inc., USA) were housed individually in standard plastic cages in a temperature-controlled room (22 ± 2 °C) on a 12 h reverse light–dark cycle. Food and water were provided ad libitum.

Controlled cortical impact

Under isoflurane anesthesia, rats received a unilateral controlled cortical impact (CCI/TBI) using the Pittsburgh Precision Instruments, Inc. device. A craniotomy was made with the center 4 mm posterior and 3–4 mm lateral to bregma using a 6 mm diameter trephan drill bit. The impact was done at an angle of 15° from vertical with a velocity of 3 m/s to a depth of 2 mm using a 5 mm diameter impact tip. These parameters were chosen to produce a moderate injury [17]. The rats were sacrificed 24 h post-injury and the brains were removed for RNA isolation or histology.

RNA preparation and GeneChip analysis

The ipsilateral hemi-brain tissue at the site of the injury, the corresponding contralateral hemi-brain tissue, and naïve (control) brain tissue (n = 3 for each) were used for RNA isolation. Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD, USA) and cleaned (RNAqueous Kit, Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). The RNA was prepared for microarray hybridization with the GeneChip® 3′ IVT Express Kit (Affymetrix Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) aRNA amplification procedure. Briefly, total RNA was reverse transcribed to synthesize first-strand cDNA containing a T7 promoter sequence. The single-stranded cDNA was converted into a double-stranded DNA template for transcription. The reaction employed DNA polymerase and RNase H to simultaneously degrade the RNA and synthesize second-strand cDNA. In vitro transcription generated multiple copies of biotin-modified aRNA from the double-stranded cDNA templates (this was the amplification step). aRNA Purification removed unincorporated NTPs, salts, enzymes, and inorganic phosphate to improve the stability of the biotin-modified aRNA. Finally, the labeled aRNA was fragmented to prepare the sample for hybridization to GeneChip® 3′ expression arrays [18]. Following fragmentation, 15 μg of the biotinylated cRNA was hybridized to an Affymetrix Rat Genome 230 2.0 GeneChip. The chips were hybridized at 45 °C for 16 h, and then washed, stained with streptavidin–phycoerythrin and scanned according to manufacturing guidelines.

Microarray data analysis

Data analysis was performed using Affymetrix Expression Console™ software that supports probe set summarization and CHP file generation of 3′ expression using the MAS5 Statistical algorithm. Affymetrix microarrays contain the hybridization, labeling and housekeeping controls that help determine the success of the hybridizations. The Affymetrix Expression Analysis algorithm uses the Tukey’s biweight estimator to provide a robust mean Signal value and the Wilcoxon’s rank test to calculate a significance or p-value and Detection call (present, marginal or absent) for each probe set. The Detection p-value is calculated using a Discrimination Score [R] for all probes. The Discrimination Score is a basic property of a probe pair that describes its ability to detect its intended target. It measures the target-specific intensity differences of the probe pair (perfect match (PM) – mismatch (MM)) relative to its overall hybridization intensity (PM + MM). Background estimation is provided by a weighted average of the lowest 2 % of the feature intensities. Mismatch probes are utilized to adjust the perfect match (PM) intensity. Linear scaling of the feature level intensity values, using the trimmed mean, is the default to make the means equal for all arrays being analyzed. False-negative and false-positive rates are minimized by subtracting nonspecific signal from the PM probe intensities and performing an intensity-dependent normalization at the probe set level. Three chips were used for each experimental group: ipsilateral, contralateral and naïve control. The dataset produced by the Affymetrix software contains gene identifiers, corresponding expression values, and determination of whether genes are confirmed as present, marginal or absent. Previous principle component analysis of the raw datasets demonstrated that ipsilateral, contralateral and naïve clustered together by injury status and each group was well isolated from the other two groups [12]. The data were analyzed in Microsoft Excel for calculation of fold change and whether the genes were confirmed as present in the tissue sample. Genes in the injured brain that increased or decreased in expression by 2-fold or more compared to controls and were present in either all 3 ipsilateral samples or all 3 contralateral samples were identified. The gene datasets that were generated were ipsilateral vs. naïve (TBI-I) and contralateral vs. naïve (TBI-C) fold changes.

Ingenuity pathway analysis

The gene datasets were analyzed between December 3, 2014 and January 8, 2015 using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Ingenuity® Systems, www.ingenuity.com) and overlaid onto a global molecular network developed from information contained in the Ingenuity Knowledge Base. The right-tailed Fisher’s Exact Test was used to determine the likelihood that the association between a set of experimental genes and a given biological function or pathway is not due to random chance [19]. In general, p-values less than 0.05 indicate a statistically significant, non-random association. The functions, canonical pathways, and gene networks that were most significant to the dataset were identified. Gene expression profiles were overlaid on the canonical pathway and gene network figures to reveal similarities and dissimilarities in their gene expression patterns. Gene networks were also created using Ingenuity Knowledge Base to further understand specific interactions between our genes of interest.

TBI-I/TBI-C ratio

We used the following formulas to calculate the ratio of TBI-I to TBI-C fold changes: (1) Gene increased on both sides (TBI-I > TBI-C): ratio = (TBI-I)/(TBI-C); (2) Gene decreased on both sides (TBI-I > TBI-C): ratio = 1/[(TBI-I)/(TBI-C)]; (3) Gene decreased on both sides (TBI-I < TBI-C): ratio = −1/[(TBI-C)/(TBI-I)]; (4) Gene increased ipsilaterally and decreased contralaterally: ratio = (TBI-I)/-[1/(TBI-C)]; (5) Gene decreased ipsilaterally and increased contralaterally: ratio = (TBI-C)/[1/(TBI-I)].

Histology

At 24 h post injury, rats were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of a ketamine:xylazine:acetylpromazine cocktail (50:10:1.67 mg/kg respectively) and perfused transcardially with saline followed by cold 4 % paraformaldehyde solution in PBS for 30 min. Brains were quickly removed and cryoprotected in 30 % sucrose. The brains were then frozen in OCT mounting medium and stored until sectioning. Coronal sections of 20 μm thickness were cryosectioned from the perilesional brain area of each animal. Sections were mounted on slides which were stored at −80 °C until further processed. Fluoro-Jade® B (AG310, Millipore, Billerica, MA) labeling was performed as previously described [20]. TUNEL staining was performed using the TUNEL reaction mixture from the In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, TMR red (12 156 792 910, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Briefly, slide-mounted sections were post-fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde for 15 min followed by a 10 min incubation in a 20 μg/mL proteinase K solution in 100 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.0) and 50 mM EDTA. The sections were then incubated for 60 min at 37 °C in the TUNEL reaction mixture. Phosphate buffered saline was used to rinse the sections after each step. A Zeiss fluorescence microscope equipped with a CCD camera (Carl Zeiss Microimaging, Inc., Thornwood, NY) was used to capture digital images of the sections.

Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

RNA was extracted as above and quantified using the Nanodrop 2000c (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). Equal amounts of ipsilateral, contralateral, and naïve RNA (n = 2 for each) were converted to cDNA using the iScript™ Reverse Transcription Supermix for RT-qPCR (170–8840, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA). The resulting product was diluted 1:100 with RNase-free sterile water. The diluted product was used in the real-time PCR analysis using the Quantitect SYBR® Green PCR Kit (204143, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), custom oligo primers for SPP1, HSPB1, STAT3, CCND1, and GAPDH (reference gene) (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD), and a Bio-Rad CFX96™ Real-Time System mounted on a C1000™ Thermal Cycler. All steps were carried out according to manufacturer’s protocols. The real-time PCR results were analyzed using the ΔΔCt method where ΔCt1 = Ct (Target A‐exp) – Ct (GAPDH-exp); ΔCt2 = Ct (Target A‐naïve) –Ct (GAPDH‐naïve); and ΔΔCt = ΔCt1 – ΔCt2. The normalized target gene expression level was given by 2-ΔΔCt. The results were compared pairwise using a one-tail T-test assuming equal variance. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.

Results

Functional analysis

To begin understanding the cell death gene response following TBI, we first looked at the biological functions associated with our datasets. Analysis of the top 15 molecular and cellular functions associated with the TBI-I (ipsilateral vs. naïve) and TBI-C (contralateral vs. naïve) datasets in IPA showed that cell death and survival (CD) was the second ranked TBI-I function that is also ranked in the top 7 functions for TBI-C (Fig. 1a, b). Also ranked in the top 7 molecular and cellular functions for both datasets are cellular growth and proliferation, cellular assembly and organization, cellular function and maintenance, cellular development, and cell morphology. Cellular movement and cell-to-cell signaling and interaction are ranked in the top 7 only for TBI-I and TBI-C, respectively.
Fig. 1

Overall functional analysis. Analysis of the top 15 molecular and cellular functions determined by IPA for the TBI-I (ipsilateral vs. naïve) dataset (a) and the TBI-C (contralateral vs. naïve) dataset (b) showed that cell death and survival was a top ranked function on both sides of the brain

Overall functional analysis. Analysis of the top 15 molecular and cellular functions determined by IPA for the TBI-I (ipsilateral vs. naïve) dataset (a) and the TBI-C (contralateral vs. naïve) dataset (b) showed that cell death and survival was a top ranked function on both sides of the brain To examine cell death histologically, we chose to look at the cortical area adjacent to the impact site so we could observe the cellular response to the injury in all layers of the cortex. This is not possible at the impact site because of the resulting injury cavity. Fluoro-Jade® B (FJB) staining showed a dense distribution of damaged neurons throughout all layers of the cortex near the sight of impact (Fig. 2a, b). Damaged neurons were also detected in the hippocampus ipsilateral to the injury (Fig. 2d). These neurons were sparsely distributed in the hippocampal CA regions. No FJB staining was detected in the cortex (Fig. 2c) or hippocampus (Fig. 2e) contralateral to the injury.
Fig. 2

Fluoro-Jade® B staining of the cortex and hippocampus. Fluoro-Jade® B (FJB) staining showed a dense distribution of damaged neurons throughout all layers of the cortex near the sight of impact (a, b). Damaged neurons were also detected in the hippocampus ipsilateral to the injury (d). These neurons were sparsely distributed in the hippocampal CA regions. No FJB staining was detected in either brain region contralateral to the injury (C: cortex; E: hippocampus). FJB: green; Scale bars: 200 μm ( , - ), 100 μm ( )

Fluoro-Jade® B staining of the cortex and hippocampus. Fluoro-Jade® B (FJB) staining showed a dense distribution of damaged neurons throughout all layers of the cortex near the sight of impact (a, b). Damaged neurons were also detected in the hippocampus ipsilateral to the injury (d). These neurons were sparsely distributed in the hippocampal CA regions. No FJB staining was detected in either brain region contralateral to the injury (C: cortex; E: hippocampus). FJB: green; Scale bars: 200 μm ( , - ), 100 μm ( ) TUNEL staining showed distribution of injured cells in the cortex similar to FJB as they were distributed throughout all layers of the cortex (Fig. 3a, b). However, no TUNEL staining was detected in the ipsilateral hippocampus (Fig. 3d), suggesting that the neuronal damage in that region had not yet progressed to apoptosis. No TUNEL was observed in the contralateral cortex (Fig. 3c) or hippocampus (Fig. 3e).
Fig. 3

TUNEL staining of the cortex and hippocampus. TUNEL staining showed distribution of injured cells in the cortex similar to FJB as they were distributed throughout all layers of the cortex (a, b). However, no TUNEL staining was detected in the ipsilateral hippocampus (d). No TUNEL was observed on the contralateral side of the brain (C: cortex; E: hippocampus). TUNEL: red; Scale bars: 200 μm ( , - ), 100 μm ( )

TUNEL staining of the cortex and hippocampus. TUNEL staining showed distribution of injured cells in the cortex similar to FJB as they were distributed throughout all layers of the cortex (a, b). However, no TUNEL staining was detected in the ipsilateral hippocampus (d). No TUNEL was observed on the contralateral side of the brain (C: cortex; E: hippocampus). TUNEL: red; Scale bars: 200 μm ( , - ), 100 μm ( )

Cell death gene expression patterns

Focusing on the CD genes in our datasets, we determined that 902 CD genes had a greater than 2-fold change in expression. Of these genes, 361 CD genes changed uniquely on the ipsilateral side of the brain. 317 of those genes (88 %) increased while 44 genes (12 %) decreased in expression (Fig. 4a). 136 CD genes changed uniquely on the contralateral side of the brain and, in contrast to what we observed on the ipsilateral side, only 34 genes (25 %) increased while 102 genes (75 %) decreased in expression (Fig. 4b).
Fig. 4

Breakdown of CD genes based on increased and decreased expression. a 361 CD genes changed uniquely on the ipsilateral side of the brain and 88 % (317 genes) of those increased in expression. b 136 CD genes changed uniquely on the contralateral side of the brain and 75 % (102 genes) of those decreased in expression. c There were 405 genes that changed more than 2-fold on both sides of the brain. Eighty-two percent of them (332 genes) changed similarly while the remaining 18 % (73 genes) changed differently (TBI-I/TBI-C ratio >2; see text)

Breakdown of CD genes based on increased and decreased expression. a 361 CD genes changed uniquely on the ipsilateral side of the brain and 88 % (317 genes) of those increased in expression. b 136 CD genes changed uniquely on the contralateral side of the brain and 75 % (102 genes) of those decreased in expression. c There were 405 genes that changed more than 2-fold on both sides of the brain. Eighty-two percent of them (332 genes) changed similarly while the remaining 18 % (73 genes) changed differently (TBI-I/TBI-C ratio >2; see text) There were 405 CD genes that changed on both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides of the brain. In order to determine whether these common genes changed differently on one side of the brain compared to the other, we calculated the ratio of the TBI-I fold change to the TBI-C fold change. Those genes that had a TBI-I/TBI-C ratio greater than 2 were determined to have changed differently. We observed that 332 of the common CD genes (82 %) changed similarly (TBI-I/TBI-C ratio < 2; Fig. 4c). Of the genes that changed similarly, 242 genes (60 %) increased in expression and 90 genes (22 %) decreased in expression. The remaining 73 common CD genes (18 %) changed differently (TBI-I/TBI-C ratio > 2) (Fig. 4c). Table 1 shows the 73 common CD genes that changed differently. These genes span all cellular compartments (extracellular space, plasma membrane, cytoplasm, and nucleus) with diverse molecule types. The expression of all these genes was lower on the contralateral side of the brain with the exception of 3 genes, DNAJB6, TRIM54 and PSIP1 (negative TBI-I/TBI-C ratio). Because of their different expression patterns, these 73 genes became our first group of genes of interest (GOI; Table 1). Notable genes given their high TBI-I/TBI-C ratio included SPP1, TIMP1, LCN2, SERPINA3, KCNN4, HSPB1, RDX, Slpi, ATRX, DNAJB6, NAA15, SMARCA4, STAT3, and THOC2.
Table 1

Genes that change differently on each side of the brain

Gene symbolEntrez gene nameTBI-I fold changeTBI-C fold changeTBI-I/TBI-C ratioMolecular type
Extracellular Space
 SPP1secreted phosphoprotein 137.9052.37015.994cytokine
 TIMP1TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 138.4862.10118.318cytokine
 CPceruloplasmin (ferroxidase)27.8388.4773.284enzyme
 FGL2fibrinogen-like 216.7934.0174.180peptidase
 LCN2lipocalin 271.8243.89518.440transporter
SERPINA3serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A (alpha-1 antiproteinase, antitrypsin), member 358.4882.50923.311other
Plasma Membrane
 CD44CD44 molecule (Indian blood group)15.5582.3996.485enzyme
 EHD4EH-domain containing 42.361−2.0564.854enzyme
 SDC1syndecan 113.6812.5665.332enzyme
 KCND2potassium voltage-gated channel, Shal-related subfamily, member 2−2.792−7.5852.717ion channel
 KCNN4potassium intermediate/small conductance calcium-activated channel, subfamily N, member 43.088−9.42929.117ion channel
CAMK2N1calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II inhibitor 1−11.813−23.8242.017kinase
 EGFRepidermal growth factor receptor6.7732.3742.853kinase
 PTPRFprotein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, F−6.365−20.4923.219phosphatase
 IL6STinterleukin 6 signal transducer2.307−3.2837.574transmembrane receptor
 CD68CD68 molecule4.3652.0072.175other
 HLA-Amajor histocompatibility complex, class I, A9.2963.6572.542other
PMEPA1prostate transmembrane protein, androgen induced 12.682−2.9377.877other
Cytoplasm
 CYP1B1cytochrome P450, family 1, subfamily B, polypeptide 110.9984.8082.287enzyme
 KIF3Akinesin family member 3A−5.083−11.7542.312enzyme
 MX1MX dynamin-like GTPase 128.1777.3263.846enzyme
 PDE4Bphosphodiesterase 4B, cAMP-specific5.6022.3592.375enzyme
 RND3Rho family GTPase 32.864−2.9718.509enzyme
 SRXN1sulfiredoxin 16.3062.4022.625enzyme
 CARD11caspase recruitment domain family, member 117.3432.8922.539kinase
CSNK2A1casein kinase 2, alpha 1 polypeptide2.992−2.7508.228kinase
 EIF5Beukaryotic translation initiation factor 5B−3.044−8.7662.880translation regulator
 RASA1RAS p21 protein activator (GTPase activating protein) 12.392−2.1055.035transporter
 AHI1Abelson helper integration site 12.243−2.8976.498other
 CISD2CDGSH iron sulfur domain 2−7.833−19.0122.427other
 CMIPc-Maf inducing protein−3.778−13.7633.643other
 CtdsplCTD (carboxy-terminal domain, RNA polymerase II, polypeptide A) small phosphatase-like−7.271−36.8865.073other
 HSPB1heat shock 27 kDa protein 146.9222.63917.780other
 KIFAP3kinesin-associated protein 3−2.281−7.8313.433other
 LCP1lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1 (L-plastin)6.0822.7992.173other
 LSP1lymphocyte-specific protein 111.7162.1405.475other
PHLDA1pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 15.1292.1602.375other
 RDXradixin4.828−5.27425.463other
 Slpisecretory leukocyte peptidase inhibitor82.9083.11926.582other
 Tpm3tropomyosin 32.592−2.7157.037other
 TRIM54tripartite motif containing 54−4.426−2.032−2.178other
Nucleus
 SETD8SET domain containing (lysine methyltransferase) 82.029−3.9307.974enzyme
 TOP2Atopoisomerase (DNA) II alpha 170 kDa2.260−2.4065.438enzyme
 CDK11Acyclin-dependent kinase 11A−4.290−14.8723.467kinase
 GSK3Bglycogen synthase kinase 3 beta−2.733−6.6352.428kinase
 SRPK2SRSF protein kinase 2−5.614−23.5894.202kinase
 THRAthyroid hormone receptor, alpha−2.799−11.5184.115ligand-dependent nuclear receptor
 ATRXalpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked2.091−5.96412.471transcription regulator
 BTG2BTG family, member 2−2.220−5.8032.614transcription regulator
 CCAR1cell division cycle and apoptosis regulator 1−2.943−11.6483.958transcription regulator
 CCND1cyclin D12.152−2.0274.362transcription regulator
 CEBPDCCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), delta11.2712.0375.533transcription regulator
 DEKDEK proto-oncogene−3.006−7.3522.446transcription regulator
 DNAJB6DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 6−4.3835.614−24.606transcription regulator
 KLF13Kruppel-like factor 13−2.006−4.5822.284transcription regulator
 KLF6Kruppel-like factor 66.0032.8652.095transcription regulator
 NAA15N(alpha)-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit3.605−3.75113.522transcription regulator
 NFIXnuclear factor I/X (CCAAT-binding transcription factor)−2.548−8.1123.184transcription regulator
 PA2G4proliferation-associated 2G4, 38 kDa−2.702−5.7832.140transcription regulator
SMARCA4SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 42.521−7.71219.442transcription regulator
 STAT3signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (acute-phase response factor)4.219−3.77115.910transcription regulator
 TBL1XR1transducin (beta)-like 1 X-linked receptor 12.587−2.1345.521transcription regulator
 TCF4transcription factor 4−2.216−4.6252.087transcription regulator
 TPRtranslocated promoter region, nuclear basket protein2.212−2.7286.034transporter
 Brd4bromodomain containing 4−3.528−15.2024.309other
 CDT1chromatin licensing and DNA replication factor 13.098−2.2957.110other
GADD45Ggrowth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible, gamma3.191−2.3847.607other
 PSIP1PC4 and SFRS1 interacting protein 1−2.6632.113−5.627other
 Rbm25RNA binding motif protein 25−5.547−16.2132.923other
 THOC2THO complex 22.119−4.88610.353other
Unknown
 EIF3Ceukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit C−4.369−9.0722.076translation regulator
 Nos1apnitric oxide synthase 1 (neuronal) adaptor protein−2.698−5.7172.119other
 RASSF4Ras association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family member 44.2892.1062.037other

TBI-I/TBI-C Ratio: Gene increased on both sides (TBI-I > TBI-C): ratio = (TBI-I)/(TBI-C); Gene decreased on both sides (TBI-I > TBI-C): ratio = 1/[(TBI-I)/(TBI-C)]; Gene decreased on both sides (TBI-I < TBI-C): ratio = −1/[(TBI-C)/(TBI-I)]; Gene increased ipsilaterally and decreased contralaterally: ratio = (TBI-I)/-[1/(TBI-C)]; Gene decreased ipsilaterally and increased contralaterally: ratio = (TBI-C)/[1/(TBI-I)]

Genes that change differently on each side of the brain TBI-I/TBI-C Ratio: Gene increased on both sides (TBI-I > TBI-C): ratio = (TBI-I)/(TBI-C); Gene decreased on both sides (TBI-I > TBI-C): ratio = 1/[(TBI-I)/(TBI-C)]; Gene decreased on both sides (TBI-I < TBI-C): ratio = −1/[(TBI-C)/(TBI-I)]; Gene increased ipsilaterally and decreased contralaterally: ratio = (TBI-I)/-[1/(TBI-C)]; Gene decreased ipsilaterally and increased contralaterally: ratio = (TBI-C)/[1/(TBI-I)]

Canonical pathway analysis

We used canonical pathway and network analysis in IPA to identify genes in our datasets that were potentially most relevant to the observed CD gene response. We defined potential GOI, in this context, as those genes that either changed in expression uniquely on one side of the brain, or were one of the 73 common genes that changed differently (Table 1). GOI were identified by comparing the genes in the canonical pathway and gene networks to the list of unique TBI-I or TBI-C CD genes with the genes from Table 1 added to each list and identifying the overlapping genes. Canonical pathways in IPA are well-characterized metabolic and cell signaling pathways derived from information found in specific journal articles, review articles, text books, and KEGG Ligand [21]. Fig. 5 shows the apoptosis signaling canonical pathway with all relevant gene families, groups and complexes expanded to show the member genes. This pathway was chosen because apoptosis is a key process in cell death following TBI [22-24]. By overlaying the relative expression values of potential GOI for TBI-I (Fig. 5a) and TBI-C (Fig. 5b), we were able to identify 9 GOI that were increased (BCL2A1 (Bfl-1 in pathway), CASP3, CASP7, CDK1 (Cdc2), IKBKB, MAP4K4, MCL1, NFKB2, and TNFRSF1A) in the TBI-I dataset, 3 GOI that decreased (ACIN1 (Acinus), BAX and KRAS) and 1 GOI that increased (MAPK8 (JNK1)) in the TBI-C dataset.
Fig. 5

Canonical pathway analysis. The apoptosis signaling pathway with all gene families, groups and complexes expanded to show the member genes and showing the relative expression values of potential GOI for TBI-I (a) and TBI-C (b) included in this pathway. red: relative increase in expression; green: relative decrease in expression; white: no change in expression; gold connections and outlines: expansion of gene families, groups and complexes in the original pathway

Canonical pathway analysis. The apoptosis signaling pathway with all gene families, groups and complexes expanded to show the member genes and showing the relative expression values of potential GOI for TBI-I (a) and TBI-C (b) included in this pathway. red: relative increase in expression; green: relative decrease in expression; white: no change in expression; gold connections and outlines: expansion of gene families, groups and complexes in the original pathway

Gene network analysis

In contrast to canonical pathways, which are relatively immutable in IPA, gene networks are generated de novo in IPA based on the list of genes that are imported. IPA takes “seed” molecules from the gene list, searches the Ingenuity Knowledge Base, and uses a network algorithm to draw connections between molecules based on biological function [25]. In order to generate the networks, we performed an IPA core analysis on the TBI-I and TBI-C CD datasets. IPA scores the networks in order to rank them according to their degree of relevance to the network eligible molecules in the dataset [25]. The top 6 scoring networks for each dataset were used to identify GOI. Five of the top 6 networks for TBI-I and all 6 networks for TBI-C have cell death and survival as their top associated biological function (Tables 2 and 3). Only TBI-I network 4 does not have cell death and survival as one of the top 3 associated biological functions. Figure 6 shows networks 2 and 4 (Table 2) as examples of the TBI-I analysis. Figure 7 shows networks 2 and 4 (Table 3) as examples of the TBI-C analysis. (The other networks are available as supplemental materials (Additional files 1 and 2).) Like the canonical pathway analysis, all relevant gene families, groups and complexes were expanded to show the member genes. The relative TBI-I (Fig. 6) and TBI-C (Fig. 7) gene expression values of potential GOI were overlaid on these networks and additional GOI were identified. Tables 4 and 5 show the resulting GOI that were identified through this analysis. For TBI-I, a total of 110 GOI were found in these networks, 22 of which were previously identified (Table 4). Thus, 88 additional GOI were identified for TBI-I. For TBI-C, 38 additional GOI were identified as 28 of the 66 GOI found had been previously identified (Table 5). The most prevalent molecular types for TBI-I were transcription regulators, unspecified enzymes, kinases, and undefined molecules. Kinases transcription regulators, unspecified enzymes, and undefined molecules were most prevalent in the TBI-C analysis.
Table 2

The top 6 gene networks associated with the TBI-I dataset

Network IDMolecules in networkScoreFocus moleculesTop diseases and functions
1 CADM1, CALB1, CBFB, CDCA7L, CMIP, Cytochrome bc1, cytochrome-c oxidase, DAB2, DEDD, FGF9, FLNA, FYN, GCLC, GCLM, GFAP, GFRA1, ITGA6, JDP2, MAOA, MED14, MGEA5, NFE2L1, NFE2L2, NPTX1, NRP1, PDHA1, PDLIM7, RET, Rnr, RPS24, RTN4, SLC18A2, Sos, STK17B, TAF4B 4631Cell Death and Survival, Drug Metabolism, Molecular Transport
2 AMOT, ANXA1, API5, ATF3, ATG12, BAG3, CCNA2, Cdc2, CDK1, CDK2, CDKN1B, ETV5, FGFR3, FN1, GJA1, Hedgehog, LATS1, MCL1, MCM2, MCM8, MLLT4, MMS22L, NAA15, Patched, PIK3C2A, PKP2, PSMA7, RAB35, RPRM, SPIN1, TAGLN2, THOC2, TJP2, UNC5B, XPO1 4632Cell Death and Survival, Cell Cycle, Reproductive System Development and Function
3 AHCTF1, AKAP12, amylase, BCL11A, CA4, CACNA1G, CCND1, CLCN7, CREB1, CREBBP, CSF1, CSRNP1, CTNNB1, DES, Histone h3, IKK (complex), ITPR2, KLF6, KPNB1, MITF, MTMR1, NFIX, PRKD3, PTGR1, RAI14, RNA polymerase II, RRM2, SENP2, SMAD4, SMARCA4, SUDS3, TBL1XR1, TGM2, THRA, ZBTB18 4331Cell Death and Survival, Organismal Survival, Gene Expression
4 ABCA1, ALB, ALDH1A2, BTG2, Ccl2, Ccl7, CD36, CEBPB, chemokine, CREM, CXCL3, DUSP5, EGR2, FGF2, FGL2, FOSL1, FSH, Hmgb2 (includes others), HMOX1, IL1, IL12 (family), IL6R, ITGB2, KLF4, MAPK9, NEK6, NEK7, PDE4B, Pld, PRKCI, PTGS2, SPP1, THBD, TLR4, WNT5A 4230Cellular Movement, Hematological System Development and Function, Immune Cell Trafficking
5 ACSL5, AGTR2, AMFR, AVP, CAMK2N1, CAPRIN1, CHSY1, CUL5, DCK, ELAVL1, Endothelin, GMCL1, GNRH, Insulin, MAP4K4, MSI2, MTORC1, NEO1, OPA1, Proinsulin, PTGER3, Relaxin, RNF2, SLC2A3, SMAD7, STAG1, TACR1, TCEB3, TMEM123, TRAF6, WAPAL, WFS1, WTAP, ZMYM2, ZNF280B 4129Cell Death and Survival, Cardiovascular System Development and Function, Hereditary Disorder
626 s Proteasome, ARL11, BCL2L1, CAMK1G, CAMK2D, CASP3, CAV1, CISD2, CLASP1, CLN5, DLG4, EN2, ENC1, Esr1-Esr1-estrogen-estrogen, FBXO9, G2E3, Hsp70, Hsp90, HSP90AB1, IDE, KIF1B, MDM2, PCDH15, PGR, PI4K2A, PRDM2, PSEN1, SGPL1, SNCA, SPTBN1, SRC (family), SRPK2, TMEM109, TRIM2, VPS41 4030Cell Death and Survival, Cancer, Neurological Disease

Bold= > Gene included in the dataset

Note: Some of the nodes in the original networks represent gene groups, complexes or families that, when expanded, contain more potential GOI

Table 3

The top 6 gene networks associated with the TBI-C dataset

Network IDMolecules in networkScoreFocus moleculesTop diseases and functions
1 ACER2, ACIN1, ACVR1C, ALDH1A2, ARHGEF7, BCL11B, caspase, CBFB, CD38, CD44, CLCN3, CUL5, DPYD, EEF1A2, FGL2, Fibrinogen, ITGB1, MAP3K1, MAP3K8, MAPK8, MAPK9, MIF, MTDH, PAK1, PRDX6, Rac, RAD23B, SPARC, Srebp, TNKS2, TTLL1, VCL, WNT5A, ZBTB18, ZYX 5031Cell Death and Survival, Cellular Movement, Ophthalmic Disease
2 ABCA1, AURKAIP1, BRINP1, BTG2, CACNA1G, CAV1, CCND1, CDK2, DCK, GCLC, Histone h3, Histone h4, Insulin, IRAK1, KMT2A, LCN2, MAFG, MTMR1, P110, PIAS1, PPARGC1B, Pro-inflammatory Cytokine, Ras homolog, RBM5, RNA polymerase II, SBF1, SETD8, SLC18A2, SMARCA2, SOX2, STAT1, TRPM7, ZBTB7A, ZMYND11, ZNF148 4428Cell Death and Survival, Gene Expression, Cellular Growth and Proliferation
3 ADNP, AHI1, ANKS1B, ARL6IP1, CDK11A, CXCL12, DNAJB6, ENC1, estrogen receptor, FBXO9, FBXW7, FGFR3, G2E3, Hdac, HSP, Hsp90, HSP90AA1, HSP90AB1, HSPB1, KLF9, KLF13, LINGO1, MED1, MED14, mediator, PA2G4, PGR, PPP3CB, RNF4, STUB1, THRA, TRAP/Media, TUFM, Ubiquitin, VPS41 4328Cell Death and Survival, Post-Translational Modification, Protein Folding
4 A2M, ACACA, AKT2, ALDH1A1, Alp, AMPK, ATG12, ATP1A1, BSG, CA3, EIF5B, ENTPD5, FGF9, FGFR1, Focal adhesion kinase, FOXO1, KRAS, MAP1B, MEF2A, Mlc, NLK, NTRK3, PALLD, PDPK1, PITX2, PPP3R1, PRKAA1, PRKCD, PSMA7, RASSF4, RPS24, Serbp1, Sfk, STK17B, TAOK1 4130Cell Death and Survival, Carbohydrate Metabolism, Cellular Development
5ACAC, AP2B1, APAF1, APC-AXIN-GSK3β, ATP2A2, ATP2B1, ATP2B2, BAX, Ca2 ATPase, calpain, CAST, CDH13, Cytochrome bc1, cytochrome C, cytochrome-c oxidase, DDIT4, DNM1L, GBX2, glutathione peroxidase, GSK3B, ITSN1, KCND2, LMO4, MAFB, MAOA, MFN1, Mitochondrial complex 1, MTF2, NCS1, NDUFAB1, NFE2L1, OPA1, PACS2, PEX11B, PRKAA2 3926Cell Death and Survival, Cell Cycle, Cellular Compromise
6Ap1, ARHGAP1, ARL6IP5, CCDC86, CCND2, CEBPD, Cg, COL1A1, DACH1, FSH, Growth hormone, Gsk3, IGFBP3, Lh, MGEA5, NEO1, PDHA1, PPP2R1A, PRLR, PSIP1, PURA, RAB27A, RPRM, RSF1, SMAD4, SMAD7, Smad1/5/8, Smad2/3, SP1, SPP1, TAF4B, Tgf beta, TIMP1, TNRC6A, ZMYM2 3926Cell Death and Survival, Tissue Development, Cellular Growth and Proliferation

Bold= > Gene included in the dataset

Note: Some of the nodes in the original networks represent gene groups, complexes or families that, when expanded, contain more potential GOI

Fig. 6

Examples of TBI-I networks. TBI-I CD networks 2 (a) and 4 (b) (see Table 2) with all gene families, groups and complexes expanded to show the member genes and showing the relative expression values of potential GOI for TBI-I. red: relative increase in expression; green: relative decrease in expression; white: no change in expression; gold connections and outlines: expansion of gene families, groups and complexes in the original network

Fig. 7

Examples of TBI-C networks. TBI-C CD networks 2 (a) and 4 (b) (see Table 3) with all gene families, groups and complexes expanded to show the member genes and showing the relative expression values of potential GOI for TBI-C. red: relative increase in expression; green: relative decrease in expression; white: no change in expression; gold connections and outlines: expansion of gene families, groups and complexes in the original network

Table 4

Identification of genes of interest from TBI-I network analysis

Network IDGOI foundTotal # of GOIOverlap with previous analysesNet # of GOITop molecular types
1 CALB1, CDCA7L, CMIP , DAB2, FLNA, GCLM, GFAP, NFE2L2, PDLIM7 918undefined
2 ANXA1, ATF3, BAG3, CCNA2, CDK1 , CDKN1B, ETV5, FN1, LATS1, MCL1 , MCM2, MCM8, MMS22L, NAA15 , RAB35, SPIN1, TAGLN2, THOC2 , TJP2, UNC5B 20416undefined, enzymes, and kinases
3 BCL11A, CCND1 , CREB1, CREBBP, CSRNP1, DES, IKBKB , ITPR2, KLF6 , KPNB1, MITF, NFIX , PTGR1, RAI14, RRM2, SENP2, SMARCA4 , SUDS3, TBL1XR1 , TGM2, THRA 21714transcription regulators and enzymes
4 ALB, BTG2 , Ccl2, CCL3L3, CCL4, Ccl6, Ccl7, CD36, CEBPB, CREM, CX3CL1, CXCL3, Cxcl9, DUSP5, EGR2, FGF2, FGL2 , FOSL1, HMOX1, IL1B, IL6R, ITGB2, KLF4, NEK6, PDE4B , PTGS2, SPP1 , TLR4 28424cytokines, transcription regulators, and transmembrane receptors
5 ACSL5, CAMK2N1 , CHSY1, ELAVL1, MAP4K4 , MSI2, PTGER3, TCEB3, TMEM123, TRAF6, WFS1 1129undefined and kinases
6 ARL11, CAMK1G, CASP3 , CISD2 , CLN5, DNAJB6, DNAJB9 , FGR, HCK, HSPA1A/HSPA1B, HSPA2, HSPA9, HSPB8, MDM2, PCDH15, PI4K2A, PRDM2, SGPL1, SNCA, SRPK2 , TMEM109 21417undefined, kinases, and transcription regulators

Italics= > gene of interest also found in a previous analysis; Bold= > GOI unique to this analysis

Table 5

Identification of genes of interest from TBI-C network analysis

Network IDGOI foundTotal # of GOIOverlap with previous analysesNet # of GOITop molecular types
1 ACIN1 , ACVR1C, CD44 , DPYD, FGL2 , MAPK8 , MTDH, RAD23B, TTLL1 945enzymes and kinases
2 AURKAIP1, BTG2 , CCND1 , LCN2 , MAFG, PIK3CD, PIK3R2, RND3 , SETD8 , SOX2, TRPM7, ZMYND11, ZNF148 1358transcription regulators, kinases, and enzymes
3 AHI1 , CDK11A , CDK19, DNAJB6 , HSP90AA1, HSPB1 , KLF13 , LINGO1, MED1, PA2G4 , PPP3CB, THRA , TUFM 1376transcription regulators, undefined, and kinases
4 EIF5B , ENTPD5, FOXO1, KRAS , MEF2A, PALLD, PRKAA2, PTK2B, RASSF4 , Serbp 1037undefined, transcription regulators, enzymes, and kinases
5 ATP2A2, ATP2B2, BAX , CDH13, GBX2, GSK3B , KCND2 , MAFB, MFN1, NDUFAB1, PRKAA2 1147transporters, kinases, enzymes, and undefined
6 CCDC86, CCND2, CEBPD , GSK3B , PRLR, PSIP1 , RSF1, SP1, SPP1 , TIMP1 1055transcription regulators, undefined, and cytokines

Italics= > gene of interest also found in a previous analysis; Bold= > GOI unique to this analysis

The top 6 gene networks associated with the TBI-I dataset Bold= > Gene included in the dataset Note: Some of the nodes in the original networks represent gene groups, complexes or families that, when expanded, contain more potential GOI The top 6 gene networks associated with the TBI-C dataset Bold= > Gene included in the dataset Note: Some of the nodes in the original networks represent gene groups, complexes or families that, when expanded, contain more potential GOI Examples of TBI-I networks. TBI-I CD networks 2 (a) and 4 (b) (see Table 2) with all gene families, groups and complexes expanded to show the member genes and showing the relative expression values of potential GOI for TBI-I. red: relative increase in expression; green: relative decrease in expression; white: no change in expression; gold connections and outlines: expansion of gene families, groups and complexes in the original network Examples of TBI-C networks. TBI-C CD networks 2 (a) and 4 (b) (see Table 3) with all gene families, groups and complexes expanded to show the member genes and showing the relative expression values of potential GOI for TBI-C. red: relative increase in expression; green: relative decrease in expression; white: no change in expression; gold connections and outlines: expansion of gene families, groups and complexes in the original network Identification of genes of interest from TBI-I network analysis Italics= > gene of interest also found in a previous analysis; Bold= > GOI unique to this analysis Identification of genes of interest from TBI-C network analysis Italics= > gene of interest also found in a previous analysis; Bold= > GOI unique to this analysis

Compiling the gene interaction hierarchy (GIH)

TBI-I: By combining the GOI identified through canonical pathway and network analysis with those in Table 1, we identified a total of 170 GOI. In order to determine which genes might be most relevant to CD, we ranked these genes relative to each other by the number of direct interactions each had with the other GOI. Our analysis showed that 145 of the GOI formed an interconnected network, leaving 25 “orphan” genes (see Additional file 3). Genes having 1st order connections with more than 10 % of the other genes within the main GOI network (>14 connections) were considered “primary” in this analysis (see Fig. 8 for an example). Genes having connections with 5 %–10 % of the other genes (8–14 connections) were considered “secondary” (see Additional file 4 for an example) and those with connections with less than 5 % of the other genes (<8 connections) were considered “peripheral”. The resultant GIH is displayed in Table 6.
Fig. 8

An example of calculating the number of direct connections for the TBI-I GOI network. In IPA, the gene in question was selected (MDM2 in this example). Then, its direct connections were selected by right clicking on MDM2 and using the “select nearest neighbors” option (highlighted in purple). A list of the selected genes was exported and MDM2 was removed from the list (upper right corner). The remaining genes were counted (26 in this example) and MDM2 was ranked in the TBI-I gene interaction hierarchy (primary tier) by this number

Table 6

TBI-I Gene interaction hierarchy (GIH)

Gene symbolEntrez gene nameFold changeCellular compartmentMolecular type
Primary
 ATF3activating transcription factor 312.027Nucleustranscription regulator
CCND1 cyclin D12.152Nucleustranscription regulator
 CEBPBCCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), beta3.366Nucleustranscription regulator
 CREB1cAMP responsive element binding protein 12.666Nucleustranscription regulator
 CREBBPCREB binding protein2.421Nucleustranscription regulator
 MDM2MDM2 proto-oncogene, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase2.01Nucleustranscription regulator
 NFE2L2nuclear factor, erythroid 2-like 22.452Nucleustranscription regulator
SMARCA4 SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 42.521Nucleustranscription regulator
STAT3 signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (acute-phase response factor)4.219Nucleustranscription regulator
 CDK1cyclin-dependent kinase 12.105Nucleuskinase
CSNK2A1 casein kinase 2, alpha 1 polypeptide2.992Cytoplasmkinase
EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor6.773Plasma Membranekinase
GSK3B glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta−2.733Nucleuskinase
CD44 CD44 molecule (Indian blood group)15.558Plasma Membraneenzyme
 FN1fibronectin 13.97Extracellular Spaceenzyme
 TRAF6TNF receptor-associated factor 6, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase2.163Cytoplasmenzyme
 CASP3caspase 3, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase2.535Cytoplasmpeptidase
 ELAVL1ELAV like RNA binding protein 13.275Cytoplasmother
Secondary
CEBPD CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), delta11.271Nucleustranscription regulator
 CREMcAMP responsive element modulator2.165Nucleustranscription regulator
 EGR2early growth response 22.271Nucleustranscription regulator
 FOSL1FOS-like antigen 15.875Nucleustranscription regulator
 KLF4Kruppel-like factor 4 (gut)2.057Nucleustranscription regulator
 MITFmicrophthalmia-associated transcription factor4.755Nucleustranscription regulator
TCF4 transcription factor 4−2.216Nucleustranscription regulator
 HSPA1A/HSPA1Bheat shock 70 kDa protein 1A3.137Cytoplasmenzyme
 MCM2minichromosome maintenance complex component 22.57Nucleusenzyme
 PTGS2prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (prostaglandin G/H synthase and cyclooxygenase)3.106Cytoplasmenzyme
 IL1Binterleukin 1, beta5.166Extracellular Spacecytokine
SPP1 secreted phosphoprotein 137.905Extracellular Spacecytokine
 CDKN1Bcyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B (p27, Kip1)3.732Nucleuskinase
 IKBKBinhibitor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells, kinase beta2.127Cytoplasmkinase
 KPNB1karyopherin (importin) beta 13.173Nucleustransporter
 MCL1myeloid cell leukemia 13.25Cytoplasmtransporter
THRA thyroid hormone receptor, alpha−2.799Nucleusligand-dependent nuclear receptor
 CASP7caspase 7, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase2.579Cytoplasmpeptidase
 BAG3BCL2-associated athanogene 34.045Cytoplasmother
 CCNA2cyclin A22.633Nucleusother
 GFAPglial fibrillary acidic protein3.011Cytoplasmother
 HSPA9heat shock 70 kDa protein 9 (mortalin)2.666Cytoplasmother
HSPB1 heat shock 27 kDa protein 146.922Cytoplasmother
 SNCAsynuclein, alpha (non A4 component of amyloid precursor)−2.169Cytoplasmother
Peripheral
 ACSL5acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 5−2.361Cytoplasmenzyme
 ANXA1annexin A13.535Plasma Membraneenzyme
 CHSY1chondroitin sulfate synthase 12.873Cytoplasmenzyme
CP ceruloplasmin (ferroxidase)27.838Extracellular Spaceenzyme
EHD4 EH-domain containing 42.361Plasma Membraneenzyme
 GCLMglutamate-cysteine ligase, modifier subunit2.019Cytoplasmenzyme
 HMOX1heme oxygenase (decycling) 19.778Cytoplasmenzyme
 MCM8minichromosome maintenance complex component 82.027Nucleusenzyme
MX1 MX dynamin-like GTPase 128.177Cytoplasmenzyme
PDE4B phosphodiesterase 4B, cAMP-specific5.602Cytoplasmenzyme
 RAB35RAB35, member RAS oncogene family2.086Cytoplasmenzyme
 RRM2ribonucleotide reductase M23.34Nucleusenzyme
SDC1 syndecan 113.681Plasma Membraneenzyme
SETD8 SET domain containing (lysine methyltransferase) 82.029Nucleusenzyme
 SGPL1sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase 13.108Cytoplasmenzyme
SRXN1 sulfiredoxin 16.306Cytoplasmenzyme
 TGM2transglutaminase 23.574Cytoplasmenzyme
TOP2A topoisomerase (DNA) II alpha 170 kDa2.26Nucleusenzyme
 BCL11AB-cell CLL/lymphoma 11A (zinc finger protein)−2.38Nucleustranscription regulator
BTG2 BTG family, member 2−2.22Nucleustranscription regulator
CCAR1 cell division cycle and apoptosis regulator 1−2.943Nucleustranscription regulator
 CSRNP1cysteine-serine-rich nuclear protein 12.821Nucleustranscription regulator
DEK DEK proto-oncogene−3.006Nucleustranscription regulator
DNAJB6 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 6−4.383Nucleustranscription regulator
 ETV5ets variant 5−2.163Nucleustranscription regulator
KLF13 Kruppel-like factor 13−2.006Nucleustranscription regulator
KLF6 Kruppel-like factor 66.003Nucleustranscription regulator
NAA15 N(alpha)-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit3.605Nucleustranscription regulator
NFIX nuclear factor I/X (CCAAT-binding transcription factor)−2.548Nucleustranscription regulator
 NFKB2nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells 2 (p49/p100)2.768Nucleustranscription regulator
PA2G4 proliferation-associated 2G4, 38 kDa−2.702Nucleustranscription regulator
 PRDM2PR domain containing 2, with ZNF domain3.677Nucleustranscription regulator
TBL1XR1 transducin (beta)-like 1 X-linked receptor 12.587Nucleustranscription regulator
 TCEB3transcription elongation factor B (SIII), polypeptide 3 (110 kDa, elongin A)3.053Nucleustranscription regulator
 CAMK1Gcalcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IG−2.271Cytoplasmkinase
CAMK2N1 calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II inhibitor 1−11.813Plasma Membranekinase
CARD11 caspase recruitment domain family, member 117.343Cytoplasmkinase
CDK11A cyclin-dependent kinase 11A−4.29Nucleuskinase
 FGRFGR proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinase3.915Nucleuskinase
 HCKHCK proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinase3.887Cytoplasmkinase
 HSPB8heat shock 22 kDa protein 84.112Cytoplasmkinase
 LATS1large tumor suppressor kinase 12.003Nucleuskinase
 MAP4K4mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 42.258Cytoplasmkinase
 NEK6NIMA-related kinase 62.322Nucleuskinase
SRPK2 SRSF protein kinase 2−5.614Nucleuskinase
 TJP2tight junction protein 22.552Plasma Membranekinase
 Ccl2chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2195.455Extracellular Spacecytokine
 CCL3L3chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3-like 35.269Extracellular Spacecytokine
 CCL4chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 42.162Extracellular Spacecytokine
 Ccl6chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 610.291Extracellular Spacecytokine
 Ccl7chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 7124.78Extracellular Spacecytokine
 CXCL3chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 313.211Extracellular Spacecytokine
 Cxcl9chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 92.846Extracellular Spacecytokine
TIMP1 TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 138.486Extracellular Spacecytokine
 IL6Rinterleukin 6 receptor2.315Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
IL6ST interleukin 6 signal transducer2.307Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
 ITGB2integrin, beta 2 (complement component 3 receptor 3 and 4 subunit)2.675Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
 TLR4toll-like receptor 42.699Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
 TNFRSF1Atumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 1A3.555Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
 UNC5Bunc-5 homolog B (C. elegans)2.067Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
 ALBalbumin−3.125Extracellular Spacetransporter
LCN2 lipocalin 271.824Extracellular Spacetransporter
RASA1 RAS p21 protein activator (GTPase activating protein) 12.392Cytoplasmtransporter
TPR translocated promoter region, nuclear basket protein2.212Nucleustransporter
FGL2 fibrinogen-like 216.793Extracellular Spacepeptidase
 SENP2SUMO1/sentrin/SMT3 specific peptidase 22.051Nucleuspeptidase
 DUSP5dual specificity phosphatase 53.285Nucleusphosphatase
PTPRF protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, F−6.365Plasma Membranephosphatase
EIF3C eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit C−4.369Othertranslation regulator
EIF5B eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5B−3.044Cytoplasmtranslation regulator
 FGF2fibroblast growth factor 2 (basic)2.387Extracellular Spacegrowth factor
KCND2 potassium voltage-gated channel, Shal-related subfamily, member 2−2.792Plasma Membraneion channel
AHI1 Abelson helper integration site 12.243Cytoplasmother
 BCL2A1BCL2-related protein A13.055Cytoplasmother
 CALB1calbindin 1, 28 kDa−2.091Cytoplasmother
CD68 CD68 molecule4.365Plasma Membraneother
 CDCA7Lcell division cycle associated 7-like2.648Nucleusother
CDT1 chromatin licensing and DNA replication factor 13.098Nucleusother
CISD2 CDGSH iron sulfur domain 2−7.833Cytoplasmother
CMIP c-Maf inducing protein−3.778Cytoplasmother
 DAB2Dab, mitogen-responsive phosphoprotein, homolog 2 (Drosophila)3.053Plasma Membraneother
 DESdesmin2.857Cytoplasmother
 DNAJB9DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 92.128Nucleusother
 FLNAfilamin A, alpha3.45Cytoplasmother
GADD45G growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible, gamma3.191Nucleusother
HLA-A major histocompatibility complex, class I, A9.296Plasma Membraneother
 HSPA2heat shock 70 kDa protein 23.51Cytoplasmother
LCP1 lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1 (L-plastin)6.082Cytoplasmother
LSP1 lymphocyte-specific protein 111.716Cytoplasmother
 MMS22LMMS22-like, DNA repair protein2.918Nucleusother
 MSI2musashi RNA-binding protein 22.288Cytoplasmother
 PDLIM7PDZ and LIM domain 7 (enigma)4.695Cytoplasmother
PHLDA1 pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 15.129Cytoplasmother
PMEPA1 prostate transmembrane protein, androgen induced 12.682Plasma Membraneother
PSIP1 PC4 and SFRS1 interacting protein 1−2.663Nucleusother
RDX radixin4.828Cytoplasmother
SERPINA3 serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A (alpha-1 antiproteinase, antitrypsin), member 358.488Extracellular Spaceother
 SPIN1spindlin 12.178Nucleusother
 SUDS3suppressor of defective silencing 3 homolog (S. cerevisiae)2.228Nucleusother
 TAGLN2transgelin 23.891Cytoplasmother
THOC2 THO complex 22.119Nucleusother
 TMEM109transmembrane protein 1092.106Cytoplasmother
 TMEM123transmembrane protein 1232.348Plasma Membraneother
Orphan
CYP1B1 cytochrome P450, family 1, subfamily B, polypeptide 110.998Cytoplasmenzyme
KIF3A kinesin family member 3A−5.083Cytoplasmenzyme
 PTGR1prostaglandin reductase 12.258Cytoplasmenzyme
RND3 Rho family GTPase 32.864Cytoplasmenzyme
 WFS1Wolfram syndrome 1 (wolframin)2.083Cytoplasmenzyme
 ITPR2inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor, type 22.489Cytoplasmion channel
KCNN4 potassium intermediate/small conductance calcium-activated channel, subfamily N, member 43.088Plasma Membraneion channel
ATRX alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked2.091Nucleustranscription regulator
 RAI14retinoic acid induced 143.284Nucleustranscription regulator
 CX3CL1chemokine (C-X3-C motif) ligand 1−2.044Extracellular Spacecytokine
 PTGER3prostaglandin E receptor 3 (subtype EP3)2.425Plasma MembraneG-protein coupled receptor
 PI4K2Aphosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2 alpha2.96Cytoplasmkinase
 CD36CD36 molecule (thrombospondin receptor)5.08Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
 ARL11ADP-ribosylation factor-like 113.143Otherother
Brd4 bromodomain containing 4−3.528Nucleusother
 CLN5ceroid-lipofuscinosis, neuronal 52.041Cytoplasmother
Ctdspl CTD (carboxy-terminal domain, RNA polymerase II, polypeptide A) small phosphatase-like−7.271Cytoplasmother
KIFAP3 kinesin-associated protein 3−2.281Cytoplasmother
Nos1ap nitric oxide synthase 1 (neuronal) adaptor protein−2.698Otherother
 PCDH15protocadherin-related 152.147Plasma Membraneother
RASSF4 Ras association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family member 44.289Otherother
Rbm25 RNA binding motif protein 25−5.547Nucleusother
Slpi secretory leukocyte peptidase inhibitor82.908Cytoplasmother
Tpm3 tropomyosin 32.592Cytoplasmother
TRIM54 tripartite motif containing 54−4.426Cytoplasmother

Primary: >14 connections in GOI network (see text); Secondary: 8–14 connections in GOI network; Peripheral: <8 connections in GOI network; Orphan: No connections in GOI network; Italics= > Gene changes on both sides of the brain

An example of calculating the number of direct connections for the TBI-I GOI network. In IPA, the gene in question was selected (MDM2 in this example). Then, its direct connections were selected by right clicking on MDM2 and using the “select nearest neighbors” option (highlighted in purple). A list of the selected genes was exported and MDM2 was removed from the list (upper right corner). The remaining genes were counted (26 in this example) and MDM2 was ranked in the TBI-I gene interaction hierarchy (primary tier) by this number TBI-I Gene interaction hierarchy (GIH) Primary: >14 connections in GOI network (see text); Secondary: 8–14 connections in GOI network; Peripheral: <8 connections in GOI network; Orphan: No connections in GOI network; Italics= > Gene changes on both sides of the brain TBI-C: A total of 115 GOI were identified. Our analysis showed that 78 of the GOI formed an interconnected network, leaving 37 “orphan” genes (see Additional file 5). Genes having 1st order connections with more than 10 % of the other genes within the main GOI network (>8 connections) were considered “primary” in this analysis (see Fig. 9 for an example). Genes having connections with 5 %–10 % of the other genes (4–8 connections) were considered “secondary” (see Additional file 6 for an example) and those with connections with less than 5 % of the other genes (<4 connections) were considered “peripheral”. The resultant GIH is displayed in Table 7.
Fig. 9

An example of calculating the number of direct connections for the TBI-C GOI network. In IPA, the gene in question was selected (SOX2 in this example). Then, its direct connections were selected by right clicking on SOX2 and using the “select nearest neighbors” option (highlighted in blue). A list of the selected genes was exported and SOX2 was removed from the list (upper right corner). The remaining genes were counted (13 in this example) and SOX2 was ranked in the TBI-C gene interaction hierarchy (primary tier) by this number

Table 7

TBI-C Gene interaction hierarchy (GIH)

Gene symbolEntrez gene nameFold changeCellular compartmentMolecular type
Primary
CCND1 cyclin D1−2.027Nucleustranscription regulator
 MED1mediator complex subunit 1−4.011Nucleustranscription regulator
SMARCA4 SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 4−7.712Nucleustranscription regulator
 SOX2SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 2−4.791Nucleustranscription regulator
 SP1Sp1 transcription factor−2.076Nucleustranscription regulator
STAT3 signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (acute-phase response factor)−3.771Nucleustranscription regulator
CSNK2A1 casein kinase 2, alpha 1 polypeptide−2.75Cytoplasmkinase
EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor2.374Plasma Membranekinase
GSK3B glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta−6.635Nucleuskinase
CD44 CD44 molecule (Indian blood group)2.399Plasma Membraneenzyme
HSP90AA1heat shock protein 90 kDa alpha (cytosolic), class A member 1−4.843Cytoplasmenzyme
Secondary
 FOXO1forkhead box O1−3.329Nucleustranscription regulator
 MEF2Amyocyte enhancer factor 2A−6.31Nucleustranscription regulator
NFIX nuclear factor I/X (CCAAT-binding transcription factor)−8.112Nucleustranscription regulator
TCF4 transcription factor 4−4.625Nucleustranscription regulator
 MAPK8mitogen-activated protein kinase 82.102Cytoplasmkinase
 PIK3R2phosphoinositide-3-kinase, regulatory subunit 2 (beta)2.332Cytoplasmkinase
 PTK2Bprotein tyrosine kinase 2 beta2.15Cytoplasmkinase
 KRASKirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog−2.027Cytoplasmenzyme
TOP2A topoisomerase (DNA) II alpha 170 kDa−2.406Nucleusenzyme
 ATP2A2ATPase, Ca++ transporting, cardiac muscle, slow twitch 2−2.607Cytoplasmtransporter
 BAXBCL2-associated X protein−3.306Cytoplasmtransporter
SPP1 secreted phosphoprotein 12.37Extracellular Spacecytokine
THRA thyroid hormone receptor, alpha−11.518Nucleusligand-dependent nuclear receptor
 TUFMTu translation elongation factor, mitochondrial−2.109Cytoplasmtranslation regulator
 CCND2cyclin D2−3.617Nucleusother
HSPB1 heat shock 27 kDa protein 12.639Cytoplasmother
Peripheral
BTG2 BTG family, member 2−5.803Nucleustranscription regulator
CCAR1 cell division cycle and apoptosis regulator 1−11.648Nucleustranscription regulator
CEBPD CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), delta2.037Nucleustranscription regulator
DEK DEK proto-oncogene−7.352Nucleustranscription regulator
DNAJB6 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog, subfamily B, member 65.614Nucleustranscription regulator
 GBX2gastrulation brain homeobox 22.59Nucleustranscription regulator
KLF6 Kruppel-like factor 62.865Nucleustranscription regulator
 MAFGv-maf avian musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog G−2.632Nucleustranscription regulator
 MTDHmetadherin−2.544Cytoplasmtranscription regulator
PA2G4 proliferation-associated 2G4, 38 kDa−5.783Nucleustranscription regulator
 RSF1remodeling and spacing factor 1−2.618Nucleustranscription regulator
TBL1XR1 transducin (beta)-like 1 X-linked receptor 1−2.134Nucleustranscription regulator
ZMYND11zinc finger, MYND-type containing 11−2.211Nucleustranscription regulator
 ZNF148zinc finger protein 1482.114Nucleustranscription regulator
 ACIN1apoptotic chromatin condensation inducer 1−2.515Nucleusenzyme
CYP1B1 cytochrome P450, family 1, subfamily B, polypeptide 14.808Cytoplasmenzyme
 DPYDdihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase2.292Cytoplasmenzyme
 MFN1mitofusin 12.304Cytoplasmenzyme
MX1 MX dynamin-like GTPase 17.326Cytoplasmenzyme
SETD8 SET domain containing (lysine methyltransferase) 8−3.93Nucleusenzyme
 TTLL1tubulin tyrosine ligase-like family, member 12.284Extracellular Spaceenzyme
ACVR1Cactivin A receptor, type IC−9.107Plasma Membranekinase
CARD11 caspase recruitment domain family, member 112.892Cytoplasmkinase
CDK11A cyclin-dependent kinase 11A−14.872Nucleuskinase
 CDK19cyclin-dependent kinase 19−2.191Nucleuskinase
 PIK3CDphosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit delta−2.113Cytoplasmkinase
 PRKAA2protein kinase, AMP-activated, alpha 2 catalytic subunit−2.546Cytoplasmkinase
SRPK2 SRSF protein kinase 2−23.589Nucleuskinase
 PPP3CBprotein phosphatase 3, catalytic subunit, beta isozyme2.1Plasma Membranephosphatase
PTPRF protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, F−20.492Plasma Membranephosphatase
IL6ST interleukin 6 signal transducer−3.283Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
 PRLRprolactin receptor−3.192Plasma Membranetransmembrane receptor
LCN2 lipocalin 23.895Extracellular Spacetransporter
RASA1 RAS p21 protein activator (GTPase activating protein) 1−2.105Cytoplasmtransporter
TIMP1 TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 12.101Extracellular Spacecytokine
EIF5B eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5B−8.766Cytoplasmtranslation regulator
AHI1 Abelson helper integration site 1−2.897Cytoplasmother
CDT1 chromatin licensing and DNA replication factor 1−2.295Nucleusother
CISD2 CDGSH iron sulfur domain 2−19.012Cytoplasmother
GADD45G growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible, gamma−2.384Nucleusother
HLA-A major histocompatibility complex, class I, A3.657Plasma Membraneother
 LINGO1leucine rich repeat and Ig domain containing 1−2.173Plasma Membraneother
 MAFBv-maf avian musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog B−2.018Nucleusother
PHLDA1 pleckstrin homology-like domain, family A, member 12.16Cytoplasmother
PMEPA1 prostate transmembrane protein, androgen induced 1−2.937Plasma Membraneother
PSIP1 PC4 and SFRS1 interacting protein 12.113Nucleusother
 RAD23BRAD23 homolog B (S. cerevisiae)−2.217Nucleusother
RASSF4 Ras association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family member 42.106Otherother
RDX radixin−5.274Cytoplasmother
 Serbp1Serpine1 mRNA binding protein 1−2.059Cytoplasmother
SERPINA3 serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A (alpha-1 antiproteinase, antitrypsin), member 32.509Extracellular Spaceother
Orphan
 AURKAIP1aurora kinase A interacting protein 1−2.023Nucleusenzyme
CP ceruloplasmin (ferroxidase)8.477Extracellular Spaceenzyme
EHD4 EH-domain containing 4−2.056Plasma Membraneenzyme
 ENTPD5ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 5−2.055Cytoplasmenzyme
KIF3A kinesin family member 3A−11.754Cytoplasmenzyme
NDUFAB1NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1, alpha/beta subcomplex, 1, 8 kDa−2.028Cytoplasmenzyme
PDE4B phosphodiesterase 4B, cAMP-specific2.359Cytoplasmenzyme
RND3 Rho family GTPase 3−2.971Cytoplasmenzyme
SDC1 syndecan 12.566Plasma Membraneenzyme
SRXN1 sulfiredoxin 12.402Cytoplasmenzyme
ATRX alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked−5.964Nucleustranscription regulator
KLF13 Kruppel-like factor 13−4.582Nucleustranscription regulator
NAA15 N(alpha)-acetyltransferase 15, NatA auxiliary subunit−3.751Nucleustranscription regulator
KCND2 potassium voltage-gated channel, Shal-related subfamily, member 2−7.585Plasma Membraneion channel
KCNN4 potassium intermediate/small conductance calcium-activated channel, subfamily N, member 4−9.429Plasma Membraneion channel
CAMK2N1 calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II inhibitor 1−23.824Plasma Membranekinase
 TRPM7transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily M, member 72.226Plasma Membranekinase
 ATP2B2ATPase, Ca++ transporting, plasma membrane 22.276Plasma Membranetransporter
TPR translocated promoter region, nuclear basket protein−2.728Nucleustransporter
FGL2 fibrinogen-like 24.017Extracellular Spacepeptidase
EIF3C eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3, subunit C−9.072Othertranslation regulator
Brd4 bromodomain containing 4−15.202Nucleusother
CCDC86coiled-coil domain containing 86−2.149Nucleusother
CD68 CD68 molecule2.007Plasma Membraneother
 CDH13cadherin 13−2.692Plasma Membraneother
CMIP c-Maf inducing protein−13.763Cytoplasmother
Ctdspl CTD (carboxy-terminal domain, RNA polymerase II, polypeptide A) small phosphatase-like−36.886Cytoplasmother
KIFAP3 kinesin-associated protein 3−7.831Cytoplasmother
LCP1 lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1 (L-plastin)2.799Cytoplasmother
LSP1 lymphocyte-specific protein 12.14Cytoplasmother
Nos1ap nitric oxide synthase 1 (neuronal) adaptor protein−5.717Otherother
 PALLDpalladin, cytoskeletal associated protein−5.086Plasma Membraneother
Rbm25 RNA binding motif protein 25−16.213Nucleusother
Slpi secretory leukocyte peptidase inhibitor3.119Cytoplasmother
THOC2 THO complex 2−4.886Nucleusother
Tpm3 tropomyosin 3−2.715Cytoplasmother
TRIM54 tripartite motif containing 54−2.032Cytoplasmother

Primary: >8 connections in GOI network (see text); Secondary: 4–8 connections in GOI network; Peripheral: <4 connections in GOI network; Orphan: No connections in GOI network; Italics= > Gene changes on both sides of the brain

An example of calculating the number of direct connections for the TBI-C GOI network. In IPA, the gene in question was selected (SOX2 in this example). Then, its direct connections were selected by right clicking on SOX2 and using the “select nearest neighbors” option (highlighted in blue). A list of the selected genes was exported and SOX2 was removed from the list (upper right corner). The remaining genes were counted (13 in this example) and SOX2 was ranked in the TBI-C gene interaction hierarchy (primary tier) by this number TBI-C Gene interaction hierarchy (GIH) Primary: >8 connections in GOI network (see text); Secondary: 4–8 connections in GOI network; Peripheral: <4 connections in GOI network; Orphan: No connections in GOI network; Italics= > Gene changes on both sides of the brain

Cell cycle genes included in the GIHs

We performed an IPA molecular and cellular functional analysis on the unranked GOI for both datasets and the top 2 tiers (most significant by our definition) of our resultant GIHs to further elucidate the most significant biological functions post-TBI (Fig. 10). The cell death and survival category was removed from this analysis since all genes were initially selected from this functional category. When analyzing the top 2 tiers of the GIHs, cell cycle was ranked second for TBI-I and first for TBI-C. Is was also the highest ranked molecular and cellular function common to both sides (Fig. 10b, d). The cell cycle moved up 5 functional ranking spots on both sides of the brain from where it was ranked prior to the GIH analysis. This result was intriguing because aberrant attempts to reactivate the cell cycle by post-mitotic neurons have been implicated as a trigger for apoptosis [26, 27]. By cross-referencing our GIHs with genes that IPA includes in the cell cycle upper level biological function, we determined that 74 genes in the TBI-I GIH and 47 genes in the TBI-C GIH were associated with the cell cycle (Tables 8 and 9). Just over 85 % of the cell cycle genes increased in expression ipsilaterally compared to controls. The relative inverse is true contralaterally with nearly 79 % of the cell cycle genes decreasing in expression. Remarkably, 83 % of TBI-I and 70 % of TBI-C primary and secondary tier genes were classified as cell cycle genes (TBI-I: 35 of 42 genes; TBI-C: 19 of 27 genes).
Fig. 10

Functional analysis of GOI and top 2 GIH tiers. The top 10 molecular and cellular functions determined by IPA to be associated with the unranked GOI for TBI-I (a) and TBI-C (c) and the primary and secondary tiers of the TBI-I (b) and TBI-C (d) GIHs. Side by side comparison allowed for visualization of how functions changed in significance order once the genes were put into a ranked order. Notably, cell cycle moved up to be ranked second on both sides of the brain. The cell death and survival category was removed from this analysis because all genes were initially selected from that functional category

Table 8

Cell cycle genes in the TBI-I gene interaction hierarchy by tier

PrimarySecondaryPeripheralOrphan
ATF3BAG3BCL2A1NEK6ATRX
CASP3CASP7BTG2NFIXBrd4
CCND1CCNA2CAMK2N1PA2G4CYP1B1
CD44CDKN1BCcl2PDLIM7
CDK1CEBPDCDK11APMEPA1
CEBPBCREMCDT1PRDM2
CREB1FOSL1DEKPTPRF
CREBBPHSPA1A/HSPA1BETV5RAB35
CSNK2A1HSPB1FGF2SETD8
EGFRIKBKBFLNASRPK2
ELAVL1IL1BGADD45GSUDS3
FN1KLF4HMOX1TBL1XR1
GSK3BKPNB1HSPA2TCEB3
MDM2MCL1IL6RTHOC2
NFE2L2MCM2KLF6TIMP1
SMARCA4MITFLATS1TNFRSF1A
STAT3PTGS2MCM8TOP2A
SPP1MMS22LTPR
Table 9

Cell cycle genes in the TBI-C gene interaction hierarchy by tier

PrimarySecondaryPeripheralOrphan
CCND1BAXACIN1MTDHATRX
CD44CCND2BTG2PA2G4Brd4
CSNK2A1FOXO1CDK11APMEPA1CAMK2N1
EGFRHSPB1CDK19PRKAA2CDH13
GSK3BKRASCDT1PTPRFENTPD5
SMARCA4MAPK8CEBPDRSF1THOC2
SOX2NFIXCYP1B1SETD8TPR
SP1PTK2BDEKSRPK2
STAT3SPP1GADD45GTBL1XR1
TOP2AKLF6TIMP1
MAFB
Functional analysis of GOI and top 2 GIH tiers. The top 10 molecular and cellular functions determined by IPA to be associated with the unranked GOI for TBI-I (a) and TBI-C (c) and the primary and secondary tiers of the TBI-I (b) and TBI-C (d) GIHs. Side by side comparison allowed for visualization of how functions changed in significance order once the genes were put into a ranked order. Notably, cell cycle moved up to be ranked second on both sides of the brain. The cell death and survival category was removed from this analysis because all genes were initially selected from that functional category Cell cycle genes in the TBI-I gene interaction hierarchy by tier Cell cycle genes in the TBI-C gene interaction hierarchy by tier

Real-time PCR

As expected, ipsilateral expression was significantly increased compared to naïve for all genes tested following TBI (Fig. 11). However, ipsilateral expression was only significantly different from contralateral expression for SPP1 and HSPB1 while this comparison for STAT3 (p = 0.088) and CCND1 (p = 0.063) fell short of statistical significance. Contralateral expression was not significantly different from naïve for any of the genes tested.
Fig. 11

Real-time PCR results for selected genes. SPP1, HSPB1, STAT3, and CCND1 were chosen for real-time PCR studies. Using the ΔΔCt method, the normalized target gene expression level was given by 2-ΔΔCt. For all genes, ipsilateral (IPSI) expression was significantly different from naïve (a-d). Ipsilateral expression was also significantly different from contralateral (CONTRA) expression for SPP1 (a) and HSPB1 (b). The comparison of ipsilateral to contralateral expression for STAT3 (c; p = 0.088) and CCND1 (d; p = 0.063) fell short of statistical significance. Contralateral expression was not significantly different from naïve for any genes. The results are shown as mean ± SE. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005

Real-time PCR results for selected genes. SPP1, HSPB1, STAT3, and CCND1 were chosen for real-time PCR studies. Using the ΔΔCt method, the normalized target gene expression level was given by 2-ΔΔCt. For all genes, ipsilateral (IPSI) expression was significantly different from naïve (a-d). Ipsilateral expression was also significantly different from contralateral (CONTRA) expression for SPP1 (a) and HSPB1 (b). The comparison of ipsilateral to contralateral expression for STAT3 (c; p = 0.088) and CCND1 (d; p = 0.063) fell short of statistical significance. Contralateral expression was not significantly different from naïve for any genes. The results are shown as mean ± SE. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005

Discussion

We used microarray technology and subsequent bioinformatic analysis in this study to examine molecular and functional alterations following TBI. Not surprisingly, cell death and survival was determined to be a significant molecular and cellular function associated with the genes expressed ipsilateral to the injury. Interestingly, while cell death was not observed on the contralateral side of the brain, there was significant modulation of cell death and survival genes and this molecular and cellular function is very highly associated with the gene expression pattern. Our histology results using markers for cell damage (FJB) and DNA fragmentation (TUNEL) suggest a potential opportunity for therapeutic intervention. At 24 h post-injury, there is a developing cortical cavity at the site of impact surrounded with FJB and TUNEL-positive cells. Therapy aimed at preserving cortical tissue should be administered in the acute period to exert maximal neuroprotective effects. However, while there is significant correlation between FJB and TUNEL staining in the cortex at this time point, no TUNEL-positive cells were detected in the hippocampus where FJB detected some neuronal damage on the ipsilateral side. Similar histology results were recently seen with our model of nerve agent exposure [20] and a neuroprotective agent was able to rescue the hippocampal neurons [28]. This suggests that these hippocampal neurons have not yet progressed to the point of apoptosis and an extended therapeutic window may exist for subcortical brain areas. Our microarray data showed that TBI resulted in significant alterations in CD gene expression on both sides of the brain. Nearly 45 % of the differentially expressed CD genes were common to both sides of the brain and 82 % of those genes changed similarly. However, a distinct expression pattern was exhibited by the balance of the common CD genes and those that change in expression uniquely on one side of the brain. The vast majority of these ipsilateral CD genes increased in expression compared to controls, while the majority of these contralateral CD genes decreased in expression compared to controls or were reduced compared to ipsilateral expression. Notable was the expression of key apoptosis-related genes. BCL2A1, caspases 3 and 7, CDK1, cyclins A2 and D1, and NFKB2 showed increased expression ipsilaterally, while BAX, cyclins D1and D2, KRAS and PIK3CD showed decreased expression contralaterally. It is important to note here that the real-time PCR results for the genes selected did not agree totally with the microarray results. This was especially true for the contralateral samples. However, it has been shown that the correlation between microarray and real-time PCR results is lower for genes showing decreased expression and having lower fold changes [29]. Our results do show better correlation with the large TBI-I fold change genes SPP1 (37.9 fold) and HSPB1 (46.9 fold). The remaining fold changes for the selected genes are less than ± 4.22 with most in the 2.0-2.6 range. While further validation including more genes and a larger sample size may be needed for subsequent studies, these PCR results are consistent with expression of these genes being higher for TBI-I and lower for TBI-C. It is in this context that the discussion of the microarray results continues. As stated above, this contralateral expression pattern in our model may indicate an endogenous effort to suppress cell death promoting genes remote from the injury in order to prevent spreading of the injury and offer additional protection from additional insults, similar to gene expression changes in ischemic preconditioning [30, 31]. An analogous and potentially neuroprotective gene expression pattern was observed in an in vitro model of mild TBI where the modulation of genes reflected an endogenous effort to prevent oxidative/nitrosative stress and apoptosis during a transient period of mitochondrial malfunctioning [32]. We have previously reported a similar gene expression pattern for inflammatory response genes following TBI [12]. In that previous study, genes from both sides of the brain were pooled for analysis. Because we now believe that analyzing gene expression on the contralateral side is critical to understanding endogenous protective mechanisms, the full GIH analysis [33] was performed on each side of the brain separately. By determining the key molecules involved in the endogenous effort to suppress cell death, it may be possible to develop molecular strategies to provide neuroprotection for the injured brain as well as augment the endogenous neuroprotective process. We identified 170 TBI-I and 115 TBI-C GOI through canonical pathway and network analysis combined with the common genes that change differently on each side of the brain. Many of these genes have been previously associated with acute brain injuries (i.e., TBI, stroke) but not all of them have been connected to the cell death caused by these injuries. These genes include BAX, CASP3, CCNA2, CCND1, CD44, CD68, CEBPD, GSK3B, HSPB1, IL1B, LCN2, NFKB2, SERPINA3, SPP1, STAT3, TIMP1, TNFRSF1A, and TOP2A [14, 34–42]. This supported the idea that our methods for identifying genes of interest targets important genes in the post-injury response. Several genes which have been linked to cell death in cancer, epilepsy, or psychological disorders but not yet associated with brain injury, including CSNK2A1, ELAVL1, MITF, and SMARCA4, were also identified which may provide additional therapeutic targets for prevention of cell death following TBI. We next wanted to determine which genes were central to cell death processes. We approached this by creating a network of our GOI within IPA and determining how many 1st order connections each gene had with the other genes in the network. A GIH was created based on these numbers and distinct patterns in terms of molecular type were found. For TBI-I, transcription regulators were the predominant molecular type in the top 2 tiers of the GIH. This result was expected from our previous GIH analyses [12]. After the transcription regulators, kinases and unspecified enzymes were prominent in the top 2 tiers of the TBI-I GIH. In the peripheral tier, unspecified enzymes, transcription regulators and kinases were most represented. Cytokines, transmembrane receptors, and transporters also had notable numbers in the peripheral tier. Remarkably, only 2 cytokines, IL1B and SPP1, are included in the top 2 tiers of this GIH. This result is not unexpected as previous GIH analysis had shown that the near 1-to-1 relationship that cytokines have with their receptors limits the 1st order connections these molecules have in the GOI network [12]. Transcription regulators were also predominant in the top 2 tiers of the TBI-C GIH followed by kinases and unspecified enzymes. These same molecular types headed the peripheral tier as well with transcription regulators ahead of enzymes and kinases. Other notable molecular types in the peripheral tier were phosphatases, transmembrane receptors, and transporters. Again, cytokines do not have significant numbers in this GIH. Our analysis strongly suggests that other molecular types, transcription regulators, kinases, and other enzymes in this case, may be better therapeutic targets because they have the potential to impact the overall cell death process to a greater extent. Very intriguing in our cell death analysis was how cell cycle moved up significantly in functional ranking on both sides of the brain when comparing the functional analysis for unranked GOI to that for the top 2 tiers of our GIHs. Cell cycle molecules have be implicated as apoptotic mediators for post-mitotic cells under stress due to trauma or neurological disease. It is believed that there is an aberrant attempt the re-enter the cell cycle that causes the cells to eventually undergo apoptosis [26, 43–48]. Much attention has been given to the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), cyclins, which activate the CDKs [27, 48, 49], and CDK inhibitors. Significant evidence for CDK involvement in cell cycle-related apoptosis has come from the experimental use of exogenous CDK inhibitors that prevented apoptosis [47, 50–56]. Pertinent to this discussion, evidence has shown that CDK1, when activated by cyclin A [57], and CDK4 and CDK6, when activated by cyclin D in post-mitotic neurons, can lead to cell death via caspase-dependent apoptosis [26, 27, 44, 49]. Additionally, ablation of cyclin D1 reduces neurodegeneration caused by TBI [58]. CDK11 has been shown to initiate apoptosis by interacting with either cyclin D3 [59] or eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit F (EIF3F) [60]. In our model, cyclins A2 and D1 are increased ipsilaterally, consistent with other studies [27, 47, 50], while both cyclins D1 and D2 are decreased contralaterally. CDK1 and the CDK4 inhibitors, CDKN1A (p21,Cip1 (not in GIH)) and CDKN1B (p27,Kip1), are all increased ipsilaterally. CDK11 (CDK11A (both sides); CDK19 (TBI-C only)) decreases in expression on both sides of the brain. While not found in our analysis, EIF3F is part of the functional core of EIF along with EIF3A (TBI-C only (not in GIH)) and EIF3C (both sides) which decrease in expression following TBI [61]. It is plausible that apoptosis would occur in this injury state because these molecules are not being expressed in the tightly controlled manner necessary to properly navigate the cell cycle [46, 55]. Other CDKs have also been implicated in apoptosis and excitotoxic cell death [26, 49, 51, 52, 62, 63] but our GIH does not point to those as major players. In addition to 4 TBI-I and 2 TBI-C CDK-related genes, IPA classified 31 other TBI-I genes and 17 other TBI-C genes in the top 2 tiers of their respective GIHs as cell cycle genes. It should be noted that cell cycle is an upper level function in IPA. That means these genes, while associated with the cell cycle, are not necessarily integral to its progression. These genes fell into 3 general categories. The first category included those genes that have been experimentally linked to a model of TBI. Genes in this category were ATF3, BAG3, CASP3, CASP7, CD44, CEBPB, CEBPD, CREB1, CREM, EGFR, FN1, FOSL1, GSK3B, HSPA1A/HSPA1B, HSPB1, IKBKB, IL1B, KLF4, MCL1, MDM2, NFE2L2, PTGS2, SPP1, and STAT3 for TBI-I [22, 36, 40–42, 64–78] and BAX, CD44, EGFR, FOXO1, GSK3B, HSPB1, MAPK8, SOX2, SPP1, and STAT3 for TBI-C [22, 36, 40, 41, 67, 71, 78–81]. The second category included genes that had been observed in models of hypoxia/ischemia, chemical brain lesions, or spinal cord injury. Genes in this category were CREBBP and KPNB1 for TBI-I [82, 83] and KRAS, PTK2B, SP1, and TOP2A for TBI-C [84-87]. The third category included genes that were previously linked only to the progression of cancers or psychotic disorders and, therefore, novel to a discussion of cell death following TBI. Genes in this category were CSNK2A1, ELAVL1, MCM2, MITF, and SMARCA4 for TBI-I and CSNK2A1, NFIX, and SMARCA4 for TBI-C. The specifics of how these genes are associated with the cell cycle and affect cell death are beyond the scope of this analysis. However, our GIH analysis would suggest that these genes would be intriguing targets for further study in relation to post-TBI cell death. Specifically, CCND1, CSNK2A1, SMARCA4, and STAT3 were included in the top 2 tiers for both datasets and exhibit increased expression in TBI-I and decreased expression in TBI-C. Additionally, cyclin D2 and 2 apoptosis signaling genes, BAX and KRAS, are in the secondary tier of the TBI-C GIH and show decreased expression. Targeting these key molecules showing contralateral suppression for potential therapies may prove effective because their expression correlates to the observed absence of cell death.

Conclusions

Unilateral TBI results in significant gene expression changes on both sides of the brain. The overall gene expression pattern in the brain suggests a suppression of CD genes contralateral to the injury which may be an endogenous protective mechanism. Using canonical pathways and IPA generated networks as a guide, we were able to identify genes that were central to the post-TBI CD gene response. Further network analysis allowed for the ranking of these genes into GIHs. The GIH ranking then led to the identification of cell cycle as a key molecular and cellular function on both sides of the brain. Significantly, several cell cycle molecules were identified in this analysis that exhibit increased expression ipsilaterally and decreased expression contralaterally. GIH analysis relies on connections in a virtual network. Future experiments will use discrete microdissected portions of the brain (cortex, hippocampus, striatum) in order to increase the likelihood that the molecular interactions described in the network actually do occur in vivo. This will increase the power of the GIH analysis. Further real-time PCR confirmation will be necessary with an emphasis on contralateral and decreased gene expression. Also, proteomic confirmation will be necessary to show that in vivo protein levels match our microarray results [88, 89]. Once confirmed, the key CD molecules suggested by our GIH can be further explored. Additional exploration into the remote suppression of CD genes may provide insight into neuroprotective mechanisms that could be used to develop therapies to prevent cell death following TBI.
  81 in total

Review 1.  Apoptosis after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  R Raghupathi; D I Graham; T K McIntosh
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Regulation of the cell adhesion molecule CD44 after nerve transection and direct trauma to the mouse brain.

Authors:  L L Jones; Z Liu; J Shen; A Werner; G W Kreutzberg; G Raivich
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2000-10-23       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 3.  Cycling at the interface between neurodevelopment and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  M D Nguyen; W E Mushynski; J-P Julien
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 4.  Cyclin-dependent kinases as potential targets to improve stroke outcome.

Authors:  Michael O'Hare; Fuhu Wang; David S Park
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 12.310

5.  Prolonged cyclooxygenase-2 induction in neurons and glia following traumatic brain injury in the rat.

Authors:  K I Strauss; M F Barbe; R M Marshall; R Raghupathi; S Mehta; R K Narayan
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  L-type voltage-gated calcium channel attends regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation of NMDA receptor subunit 2A induced by transient brain ischemia.

Authors:  Yong Liu; Xiao-Yu Hou; Guang-Yi Zhang; Tian-Le Xu
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-16       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Acute activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases following traumatic brain injury in the rat: implications for posttraumatic cell death.

Authors:  Ramesh Raghupathi; Judith K Muir; Carl T Fulp; Randall N Pittman; Tracy K McIntosh
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Altered expression of novel genes in the cerebral cortex following experimental brain injury.

Authors:  Nobuhide Kobori; Guy L Clifton; Pramod Dash
Journal:  Brain Res Mol Brain Res       Date:  2002-08-15

9.  Gene expression profile changes are commonly modulated across models and species after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Joanne E Natale; Farid Ahmed; Ibolja Cernak; Bogdan Stoica; Alan I Faden
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Effect of ischaemic preconditioning on genomic response to cerebral ischaemia: similarity to neuroprotective strategies in hibernation and hypoxia-tolerant states.

Authors:  Mary P Stenzel-Poore; Susan L Stevens; Zhigang Xiong; Nikola S Lessov; Christina A Harrington; Motomi Mori; Robert Meller; Holly L Rosenzweig; Eric Tobar; Tatyana E Shaw; Xiangping Chu; Roger P Simon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-09-27       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  12 in total

1.  Analysis of Post-Traumatic Brain Injury Gene Expression Signature Reveals Tubulins, Nfe2l2, Nfkb, Cd44, and S100a4 as Treatment Targets.

Authors:  Anssi Lipponen; Jussi Paananen; Noora Puhakka; Asla Pitkänen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Molecular mechanism of estrogen-mediated neuroprotection in the relief of brain ischemic injury.

Authors:  Jiaxuan He; Ya Gao; Gang Wu; Xiaoming Lei; Yong Zhang; Weikang Pan; Hui Yu
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.797

3.  Systemic functional enrichment and ceRNA network identification following peripheral nerve injury.

Authors:  Tianmei Qian; Chunlin Fan; Qianyan Liu; Sheng Yi
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.041

4.  Chronic synaptic insulin resistance after traumatic brain injury abolishes insulin protection from amyloid beta and tau oligomer-induced synaptic dysfunction.

Authors:  Whitney Franklin; Balaji Krishnan; Giulio Taglialatela
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Time-Dependent Changes in Microglia Transcriptional Networks Following Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Saef Izzy; Qiong Liu; Zhou Fang; Sevda Lule; Limin Wu; Joon Yong Chung; Aliyah Sarro-Schwartz; Alexander Brown-Whalen; Caroline Perner; Suzanne E Hickman; David L Kaplan; Nikolaos A Patsopoulos; Joseph El Khoury; Michael J Whalen
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 5.505

6.  Inflammation-related gene expression profiles of salivary extracellular vesicles in patients with head trauma.

Authors:  Yan Cheng; Mandy Pereira; Neha P Raukar; John L Reagan; Mathew Quesenberry; Laura Goldberg; Theodor Borgovan; W Curt LaFrance Jr; Mark Dooner; Maria Deregibus; Giovanni Camussi; Bharat Ramratnam; Peter Quesenberry
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.135

7.  Older Age Results in Differential Gene Expression after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Is Linked to Imaging Differences at Acute Follow-up.

Authors:  Young-Eun Cho; Lawrence L Latour; Hyungsuk Kim; L Christine Turtzo; Anlys Olivera; Whitney S Livingston; Dan Wang; Christiana Martin; Chen Lai; Ann Cashion; Jessica Gill
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Transcription factors Tp73, Cebpd, Pax6, and Spi1 rather than DNA methylation regulate chronic transcriptomics changes after experimental traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Anssi Lipponen; Assam El-Osta; Antony Kaspi; Mark Ziemann; Ishant Khurana; Harikrishnan Kn; Vicente Navarro-Ferrandis; Noora Puhakka; Jussi Paananen; Asla Pitkänen
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 7.801

9.  Potential biomarkers to detect traumatic brain injury by the profiling of salivary extracellular vesicles.

Authors:  Yan Cheng; Mandy Pereira; Neha Raukar; John L Reagan; Mathew Queseneberry; Laura Goldberg; Theodor Borgovan; W Curt LaFrance; Mark Dooner; Maria Deregibus; Giovanni Camussi; Bharat Ramratnam; Peter Quesenberry
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 6.384

10.  Plasma Exosome-derived MicroRNAs as Novel Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats.

Authors:  Pengcheng Wang; Haoli Ma; Yuxian Zhang; Rong Zeng; Jiangtao Yu; Ruining Liu; Xiaoqing Jin; Yan Zhao
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.