BACKGROUND: Molecular mechanisms of neuroprotection that lead to ischaemic tolerance are incompletely understood. Identification of genes involved in the process would provide insight into cell survival and therapeutic approaches for stroke. We developed a mouse model of neuroprotection in stroke and did gene expression profiling to identify potential neuroprotective genes and their associated pathways. METHODS: Eight mice per condition were subjected to occlusion of the middle cerebral artery for 15 min (preconditioning), 60 min (injurious ischaemia), or preconditioning followed 72 h later by injurious ischaemia. RNA was extracted from the cortical regions of the ischaemic and non-ischaemic hemispheres. Three pools per condition were generated, and RNA was hybridised to oligonucleotide microarrays for comparison of ischaemic and non-ischaemic hemispheres. Real-time PCR and western blots were used to validate results. Follow-up experiments were done to address the biological relevance of findings. FINDINGS: Microarray analysis revealed changes in gene expression with little overlap among the conditions of injurious ischaemia, ischaemic preconditioning, or both. Injurious ischaemia induced upregulation of gene expression; 49 (86%) of 57 genes regulated showed increased expression in the ischaemic hemisphere. By contrast, preconditioning followed by injurious ischaemia resulted in pronounced downregulation; 47 (77%) of 61 regulated genes showed lower expression. Preconditioning resulted in transcriptional changes involved in suppression of metabolic pathways and immune responses, reduction of ion-channel activity, and decreased blood coagulation. INTERPRETATION: Preconditioning reprogrammes the response to ischaemic injury. Similar changes reported by others support an evolutionarily conserved endogenous response to decreased blood flow and oxygen limitation such as seen during hibernation.
BACKGROUND: Molecular mechanisms of neuroprotection that lead to ischaemic tolerance are incompletely understood. Identification of genes involved in the process would provide insight into cell survival and therapeutic approaches for stroke. We developed a mouse model of neuroprotection in stroke and did gene expression profiling to identify potential neuroprotective genes and their associated pathways. METHODS: Eight mice per condition were subjected to occlusion of the middle cerebral artery for 15 min (preconditioning), 60 min (injurious ischaemia), or preconditioning followed 72 h later by injurious ischaemia. RNA was extracted from the cortical regions of the ischaemic and non-ischaemic hemispheres. Three pools per condition were generated, and RNA was hybridised to oligonucleotide microarrays for comparison of ischaemic and non-ischaemic hemispheres. Real-time PCR and western blots were used to validate results. Follow-up experiments were done to address the biological relevance of findings. FINDINGS: Microarray analysis revealed changes in gene expression with little overlap among the conditions of injurious ischaemia, ischaemic preconditioning, or both. Injurious ischaemia induced upregulation of gene expression; 49 (86%) of 57 genes regulated showed increased expression in the ischaemic hemisphere. By contrast, preconditioning followed by injurious ischaemia resulted in pronounced downregulation; 47 (77%) of 61 regulated genes showed lower expression. Preconditioning resulted in transcriptional changes involved in suppression of metabolic pathways and immune responses, reduction of ion-channel activity, and decreased blood coagulation. INTERPRETATION: Preconditioning reprogrammes the response to ischaemic injury. Similar changes reported by others support an evolutionarily conserved endogenous response to decreased blood flow and oxygen limitation such as seen during hibernation.
Authors: Feng Zhang; Suping Wang; Li Gan; Peter S Vosler; Yanqin Gao; Michael J Zigmond; Jun Chen Journal: Prog Neurobiol Date: 2011-09-10 Impact factor: 11.685
Authors: Ross C McKiernan; Eva M Jimenez-Mateos; Takanori Sano; Isabella Bray; Raymond L Stallings; Roger P Simon; David C Henshall Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 5.330