| Literature DB >> 26911388 |
John S Luque1, Samuel Opoku2, Daron G Ferris3,4, Wendy S Guevara Condorhuaman5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Peru has high cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates compared to other Andean countries. Therefore, partnerships between governmental and international organizations have targeted rural areas of Peru to receive cervical cancer screening via outreach campaigns. Previous studies have found a relationship between a person's social networks and cancer screening behaviors. Screening outreach campaigns conducted by the nonprofit organization CerviCusco created an opportunity for a social network study to examine cervical cancer screening history and social network characteristics in a rural indigenous community that participated in these campaigns in 2012 and 2013. The aim of this study was to explore social network characteristics in this community related to receipt of cervical cancer screening following the campaigns.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26911388 PMCID: PMC4765061 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-2878-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Demographic Characteristics and Pap Test History of Survey Participants
| Characteristic | Total ( |
|---|---|
| Age, years | 37 (21–59) |
| Years of schooling | 7.2 (0–16) |
| # People in household | 4.4 (2–9) |
| Median income category/month ( | S/. 201–400 |
| Score on Guttman wealth scalea (0 = low to 8 = high) | 5.6 (2–7) |
| Score on Spanish language acculturation scaleb (0 = low to 4 = high) | 1.0 (0–3) |
| Marital status | |
| Married/living with a partner | 61 (88 %) |
| Single/Widow | 8 (12 %) |
| Currently employed | 32 (46 %) |
| Residence | |
| Rent | 14 (20 %) |
| Own | 55 (80 %) |
| Pap test at CerviCusco campaign in 2012 or 2013 | 19 (28 %) |
| Self-reported Pap test | |
| 1 year or less | 30 (43 %) |
| > 1 yr. < 3 yrs. | 17 (25 %) |
| > 3 yrs. < 5 yrs. | 2 (3 %) |
| Never had a Pap test | 20 (29 %) |
Notes: Columns in mean values (ranges) for continuous variables and frequencies (percentages) for categorical variables
a Modified version of a Guttman wealth scale with the following items: kitchen with gas, radio, TV, bicycle, refrigerator, plumbing, electricity, sanitation [20]
b Modified version of the Acculturation Scale for Mexican Americans (ASMA) was used to measure acculturation (substituting “Quechua” for “English” language), with a value of “4” meaning completely Spanish language acculturated [19]
Ego Network Characteristics Based on 6 Alters
| Characteristic | Total |
|---|---|
| Percent of alters - family | 42 |
| Percent of alters - friend | 15 |
| Percent of alters - neighbor | 26 |
| Percent of discussions - health | 33 |
| Number of years have known alters | 20.8 (7.4) |
| Frequency of communication with altersa | 1.6 (0.5) |
| Distance between altersb | 0.6 (0.4) |
| Densityc | 0.8 (0.3) |
| Degree centrality | 4.2 (1.3) |
| Betweenness centrality | 0.2 (0.4) |
Notes: Columns in mean values (SD) for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables
aFrequency of communication with alters, 1 = “daily”; 2 = “1 time/week”; 3 = “2 times/week”; 4 = “3 times/week”
bDistance between alters, 0 = “less than 5 km”; 1 = “more than 5 km”
cDensity calculated based on the mean of the closeness variable between each alter pair (0 = “no tie”; 1 = “tie”)
Comparison of Demographic and Ego Network Characteristics by Confirmed Pap Test Receipt at CerviCusco Outreach Campaign
| Received Pap Test ( | Never Received Pap Test ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic Characteristics | |||
| Age | 38.5 | 36.1 | 0.26 |
| Number of people in household | 4.8 | 4.3 | 0.19 |
| Years of schooling | 5.4 | 7.9 | 0.04* |
| Monthly income | |||
| 0–400 soles | 13 | 27 | 0.41 |
| 401 soles and higher | 6 | 23 | |
| Marital status | |||
| Married/living with a partner | 19 | 42 | 0.06 |
| Single/Widow | 0 | 8 | |
| Currently employed | |||
| Yes | 6 | 26 | 0.11 |
| No | 13 | 24 | |
| Residence | |||
| Own | 14 | 40 | 0.40 |
| Rent | 5 | 10 | |
| Guttman SES score | 5.6 | 5.6 | 0.79 |
| Spanish acculturation score | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.41 |
| Ego Network Characteristics | |||
| Percent of alters - family | 16.7 % | 51.3 % | 0.00** |
| Percent of alters - friend | 14.0 % | 16.0 % | 0.75 |
| Percent of alters - neighbor | 42.1 % | 20.0 % | 0.01** |
| Percent of discussions - health | 26.8 % | 35.7 % | 0.23 |
| Number of years have known alters | 17.8 | 21.9 | 0.04* |
| Frequency of communication with alters | 1.7 | 1.6 | 0.61 |
| Distance between alters | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.19 |
| Density | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.03* |
| Degree centrality | 3.6 | 4.5 | 0.03* |
| Betweenness centrality | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.48 |
Notes: Columns in mean values for continuous variables and frequencies or percentages for categorical variables
*p < .05; **p < .01
Logistic Regression Analysis of Confirmed Pap Test Receipt at CerviCusco Outreach Campaigns by Social Network Variables
| Predictor | β |
| Wald’s χ2 |
|
| OR | 95 % CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 2.685 | 1.144 | 5.509 | 1 | 0.019 | NA | |
| Percent of alters - family | −3.706 | 1.186 | 9.768 | 1 | 0.002 | 0.025 | 0.002–0.251 |
| Density | −3.063 | 1.222 | 6.278 | 1 | 0.012 | 0.047 | 0.004–0.513 |
| Test | χ2 |
|
| ||||
| Goodness-of-fit test | |||||||
| Hosmer & Lemeshow | 12.932 | 7 | 0.074 |
Note. Cox and Snell R 2 = .261. Nagelkerke R 2 = .378. NA = not applicable. Model χ2 (2) = 20.911, p < .001