Literature DB >> 15668494

Social ties and colorectal cancer screening among Blacks and Whites in North Carolina.

Anita Yeomans Kinney1, Lindsey E Bloor, Christopher Martin, Robert S Sandler.   

Abstract

Few studies have examined the relationship between social networks and colorectal cancer screening in diverse populations. Prior research suggests that the type of social support as well as the amount or frequency of support available from one's social network may be associated with health outcomes. Therefore, the current study examined relationships between both structural (i.e., quantitative aspects of the social network, such as number of ties and frequency of contact with ties) and functional (i.e., functions provided by social network ties, such as offering emotional or instrumental support) aspects of social ties and utilization of colorectal cancer screening tests. Analyses included 697 randomly selected Blacks and Whites ages 51 to 80 years enrolled as controls in the North Carolina Colon Cancer Study. Social tie and screening information was obtained from face-to-face interviews. Forty-seven percent of participants (40% Blacks and 51% Whites) reported use of one of the options for colorectal cancer screening according to the guidelines at that time. Compared with those with the fewest social connections, those who were most socially connected were more likely to report recent use of colorectal cancer screening [odds ratio (OR), 3.2; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.7-6.2]. This association was stronger among Blacks (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.3-10.7) than Whites (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-6.9; P for interaction = 0.006). There were also positive associations between being a church group (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.7) and other group member (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2) and screening. Neither emotional (e.g., offering reassurance that one is cared for) nor instrumental (e.g., giving material assistance) support was associated with screening behavior. These data suggest that structural rather than functional aspects of social ties may be important in influencing colorectal cancer screening behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15668494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  39 in total

1.  Social network resources and management of hypertension.

Authors:  Erin York Cornwell; Linda J Waite
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2012

Review 2.  A review of social isolation: an important but underassessed condition in older adults.

Authors:  Nicholas R Nicholson
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2012-06

3.  E-mail to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Within Social Networks: Acceptability and Content.

Authors:  Sarah L Cutrona; Joann Wagner; Douglas W Roblin; Bridget Gaglio; Andrew Williams; Rosalie Torres-Stone; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-04-03

4.  Predictors of compliance with free endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in uninsured adults.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; Richard H Fortinsky; Alison Kleppinger; Amanda B Merz-Beyus; Charles G Huntington; Suzanne Lagarde
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Acceptance of genetic testing for hereditary breast ovarian cancer among study enrollees from an African American kindred.

Authors:  Anita Yeomans Kinney; Sara Ellis Simonsen; Bonnie Jeanne Baty; Diptasri Mandal; Susan L Neuhausen; Kate Seggar; Rich Holubkov; Ken Smith
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Religious beliefs and cancer screening behaviors among Catholic Latinos: implications for faith-based interventions.

Authors:  Jennifer D Allen; Bryan Leyva; A Idal Torres; Hosffman Ospino; Laura Tom; Sarah Rustan; Amanda Bartholomew
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2014-05

7.  Psychosocial determinants of intention to screen for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  James E Galvin; Qiang Fu; Joseph T Nguyen; Cristie Glasheen; Darcell P Scharff
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 21.566

8.  Religion and preventive service use: do congregational support and religious beliefs explain the relationship between attendance and utilization?

Authors:  Maureen R Benjamins; Christopher G Ellison; Neal M Krause; John P Marcum
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-02-01

9.  Disparities in receipt of screening tests for cancer, diabetes and high cholesterol in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study using area-based methods.

Authors:  Cornelia M Borkhoff; Refik Saskin; Linda Rabeneck; Nancy N Baxter; Ying Liu; Jill Tinmouth; Lawrence F Paszat
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2013-06-21

10.  Perspectives of colorectal cancer risk and screening among Dominicans and Puerto Ricans: stigma and misperceptions.

Authors:  Roberta E Goldman; Joseph A Diaz; Ivone Kim
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2009-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.