Literature DB >> 26911297

Second fractures among older adults in the year following hip, shoulder, or wrist fracture.

J P W Bynum1,2, J-E Bell3, R V Cantu3, Q Wang4, C M McDonough4,5, D Carmichael4, T D Tosteson6,3, A N A Tosteson4,6,3.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We report on second fracture occurrence in the year following a hip, shoulder or wrist fracture using insurance claims. Among 273,330 people, 4.3 % had a second fracture; risk did not differ by first fracture type. Estimated adjusted second fracture probabilities may facilitate population-based evaluation of secondary fracture prevention strategies.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was estimate second fracture risk for the older US population in the year following a hip, shoulder, or wrist fracture.
METHODS: Observational cohort study of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with an index hip, shoulder, or wrist fragility fracture in 2009. Time-to-event analyses using Cox proportional hazards models to characterize the relationship between index fracture type (hip, shoulder, wrist) and patient factors (age, gender, and comorbidity) on second fracture risk in the year following the index fracture.
RESULTS: Among 273,330 individuals with fracture, 11,885 (4.3 %) sustained a second hip, shoulder or wrist fracture within one year. Hip fracture was most common, regardless of the index fracture type. Comparing adjusted second fracture risks across index fracture types reveals that the magnitude of second fracture risk within each age-comorbidity group is similar regardless of the index fracture. Men and women face similar risks with frequently overlapping confidence intervals, except among women aged 85 years or older who are at greater risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of index fracture type, second fractures are common in the year following hip, shoulder or wrist fracture. Secondary fracture prevention strategies that take a population perspective should be informed by these estimates which take competing mortality risks into account.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hip fracture; Osteoporosis; Risk; Shoulder fracture; Wrist fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26911297      PMCID: PMC5008031          DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3542-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  15 in total

1.  Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989.

Authors:  C Cooper; E J Atkinson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Fracture incidence in Olmsted County, Minnesota: comparison of urban with rural rates and changes in urban rates over time.

Authors:  L J Melton; C S Crowson; W M O'Fallon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Incidence of second hip fracture and compliant use of bisphosphonate.

Authors:  Y-K Lee; Y-C Ha; B-H Yoon; K-H Koo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Refractures in patients at least forty-five years old. a prospective analysis of twenty-two thousand and sixty patients.

Authors:  C M Robinson; M Royds; A Abraham; M M McQueen; C M Court-Brown; J Christie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; C De Laet; H Johansson; A Oden; P Delmas; J Eisman; S Fujiwara; P Garnero; H Kroger; E V McCloskey; D Mellstrom; L J Melton; H Pols; J Reeve; A Silman; A Tenenhouse
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Comorbidity risk-adjustment strategies are comparable among persons with hip fracture.

Authors:  David C Radley; Daniel J Gottlieb; Elliot S Fisher; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Secular trends in hip fracture incidence and recurrence.

Authors:  L J Melton; A E Kearns; E J Atkinson; M E Bolander; S J Achenbach; J M Huddleston; T M Therneau; C L Leibson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Cost-effectiveness of bone densitometry followed by treatment of osteoporosis in older men.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; Brent C Taylor; Howard A Fink; Robert L Kane; Steven R Cummings; Eric S Orwoll; L Joseph Melton; Douglas C Bauer; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Undertreatment of osteoporosis in men with hip fracture.

Authors:  Gary M Kiebzak; Garth A Beinart; Karen Perser; Catherine G Ambrose; Sherwin J Siff; Michael H Heggeness
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-10-28
View more
  23 in total

1.  Impact of prescription drugs on second fragility fractures among US Medicare patients.

Authors:  J C Munson; J P W Bynum; J-E Bell; C McDonough; Q Wang; T Tosteson; A N A Tosteson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Five-year refracture rates of a province-wide fracture liaison service.

Authors:  R Sujic; D E Beaton; M Mamdani; S M Cadarette; J Luo; S Jaglal; J E M Sale; R Jain; E Bogoch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Falling Down on the Job: Evaluation and Treatment of Fall Risk Among Older Adults With Upper Extremity Fragility Fractures.

Authors:  Christine M McDonough; Carrie H Colla; Donald Carmichael; Anna N A Tosteson; Tor D Tosteson; John-Erik Bell; Robert V Cantu; Jonathan D Lurie; Julie P W Bynum
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2017-03-01

4.  Preceding and subsequent high- and low-trauma fracture patterns-a 13-year epidemiological study in females and males in Austria.

Authors:  C Muschitz; R Kocijan; A Baierl; R Dormann; X Feichtinger; J Haschka; M Szivak; G K Muschitz; J Schanda; P Pietschmann; H Resch; H P Dimai
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  FRAX for fracture prediction shorter and longer than 10 years: the Manitoba BMD registry.

Authors:  W D Leslie; S R Majumdar; S N Morin; L M Lix; H Johansson; A Oden; E V McCloskey; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Fracture liaison service and mortality in elderly hip fracture patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  D González-Quevedo; D Bautista-Enrique; V Pérez-Del-Río; M Bravo-Bardají; D García-de-Quevedo; I Tamimi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Patterns of Opioid Use in the 12 Months Following Geriatric Fragility Fractures: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michael T Torchia; Jeffrey Munson; Tor D Tosteson; Anna N A Tosteson; Qianfei Wang; Christine M McDonough; Tamara S Morgan; Julie P W Bynum; John-Erik Bell
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.669

Review 8.  Imminent fracture risk.

Authors:  C Roux; K Briot
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Perspectives on the non-invasive evaluation of femoral strength in the assessment of hip fracture risk.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; P Zysset; C C Glüer; M McClung; E Biver; D D Pierroz; S L Ferrari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Associations between radius low-frequency axial ultrasound velocity and bone fragility in elderly men and women.

Authors:  E Biver; J Pepe; A de Sire; T Chevalley; S Ferrari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.