W D Leslie1, S R Majumdar2, S N Morin3, L M Lix4, H Johansson5, A Oden5, E V McCloskey5, J A Kanis5,6. 1. Department of Medicine (C5121), St Boniface Hospital, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6, Canada. bleslie@sbgh.mb.ca. 2. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 3. McGill University, Montreal, Canada. 4. Department of Medicine (C5121), St Boniface Hospital, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6, Canada. 5. Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK. 6. Institute for Health and Ageing, Catholic University of Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
In a large clinical registry for the province of Manitoba, Canada, FRAX predicted incident MOF and hip fracture from 1 to 15 years following baseline assessment. A simple linear rescaling of FRAX outputs seems useful for predicting both short- and long-term fracture risk in this population. INTRODUCTION: FRAX® estimates 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture. We examined FRAX predictions over intervals shorter and longer than 10 years. METHODS: Using a population-based clinical registry for Manitoba, Canada, we identified 62,275 women and 6455 men 40 years and older with baseline dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans and FRAX scores. Incident MOF and hip fracture were assessed up to 15 years from population-based data. We assessed agreement between estimated fracture probability from 1 to 15 years using linearly rescaled FRAX scores and observed cumulative fracture probability. The gradient of risk for FRAX probability and incident fracture was examined overall and for 5-year intervals. RESULTS: FRAX predicted incident MOF and hip fracture for all time intervals. There was no attenuation in the gradient of risk for MOF even for years >10. Gradient of risk was slightly lower for hip fracture prediction in years >10 vs years <5, though HRs remained high. Linear agreement was seen in the relationships between observed vs predicted (rescaled) FRAX probabilities (R 2 0.95-1.00). Among women, there was near-perfect linearity in MOF predictions. Deviations from linearity, with a slightly higher observed than predicted MOF probability, were most evident in the first years following a fracture event and after 10 years for hip fracture prediction in women using FRAX with BMD. Simulations showed that results were robust to large differences in fracture rates and moderate differences in mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: FRAX predicts incident MOF and hip fracture up to 15 years and could be adapted to predict fracture over time periods shorter and longer term than 10 years in populations with fracture and mortality epidemiology similar to Canada.
In a large clinical registry for the province of Manitoba, Canada, FRAX predicted incident MOF and hip fracture from 1 to 15 years following baseline assessment. A simple linear rescaling of FRAX outputs seems useful for predicting both short- and long-term fracture risk in this population. INTRODUCTION: FRAX® estimates 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture. We examined FRAX predictions over intervals shorter and longer than 10 years. METHODS: Using a population-based clinical registry for Manitoba, Canada, we identified 62,275 women and 6455 men 40 years and older with baseline dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans and FRAX scores. Incident MOF and hip fracture were assessed up to 15 years from population-based data. We assessed agreement between estimated fracture probability from 1 to 15 years using linearly rescaled FRAX scores and observed cumulative fracture probability. The gradient of risk for FRAX probability and incident fracture was examined overall and for 5-year intervals. RESULTS: FRAX predicted incident MOF and hip fracture for all time intervals. There was no attenuation in the gradient of risk for MOF even for years >10. Gradient of risk was slightly lower for hip fracture prediction in years >10 vs years <5, though HRs remained high. Linear agreement was seen in the relationships between observed vs predicted (rescaled) FRAX probabilities (R 2 0.95-1.00). Among women, there was near-perfect linearity in MOF predictions. Deviations from linearity, with a slightly higher observed than predicted MOF probability, were most evident in the first years following a fracture event and after 10 years for hip fracture prediction in women using FRAX with BMD. Simulations showed that results were robust to large differences in fracture rates and moderate differences in mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: FRAX predicts incident MOF and hip fracture up to 15 years and could be adapted to predict fracture over time periods shorter and longer term than 10 years in populations with fracture and mortality epidemiology similar to Canada.
Entities:
Keywords:
DXA; FRAX; Fracture risk assessment; Osteoporosis; Other analysis/quantitation of bone
Authors: Robert B Hopkins; Ron Goeree; Eleanor Pullenayegum; Jonathan D Adachi; Alexandra Papaioannou; Feng Xie; Lehana Thabane Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2011-09-26 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: L-A Fraser; L Langsetmo; C Berger; G Ioannidis; D Goltzman; J D Adachi; A Papaioannou; R Josse; C S Kovacs; W P Olszynski; T Towheed; D A Hanley; S M Kaiser; J Prior; S Jamal; N Kreiger; J P Brown; H Johansson; A Oden; E McCloskey; J A Kanis; W D Leslie Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-12-16 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: O Johnell; J A Kanis; A Odén; I Sernbo; I Redlund-Johnell; C Petterson; C De Laet; B Jönsson Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2003-10-30 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Steven R Cummings; Felicia Cosman; Richard Eastell; Ian R Reid; Mona Mehta; E Michael Lewiecki Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Catherine MacLean; Sydne Newberry; Margaret Maglione; Maureen McMahon; Veena Ranganath; Marika Suttorp; Walter Mojica; Martha Timmer; Alicia Alexander; Melissa McNamara; Sheetal B Desai; Annie Zhou; Susan Chen; Jason Carter; Carlo Tringale; Di Valentine; Breanne Johnsen; Jennifer Grossman Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-12-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Ahmed M Negm; George Ioannidis; Micaela Jantzi; Jenn Bucek; Lora Giangregorio; Laura Pickard; John P Hirdes; Jonathan D Adachi; Julie Richardson; Lehana Thabane; Alexandra Papaioannou Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2018-12-27 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: E Michael Lewiecki; Jesse D Ortendahl; Jacqueline Vanderpuye-Orgle; Andreas Grauer; Jorge Arellano; Jeffrey Lemay; Amanda L Harmon; Michael S Broder; Andrea J Singer Journal: JBMR Plus Date: 2019-05-13
Authors: Roland Chapurlat; Minh Bui; Elisabeth Sornay-Rendu; Roger Zebaze; Pierre D Delmas; Danny Liew; Eric Lespessailles; Ego Seeman Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 6.390