Literature DB >> 12208908

Refractures in patients at least forty-five years old. a prospective analysis of twenty-two thousand and sixty patients.

C M Robinson1, M Royds, A Abraham, M M McQueen, C M Court-Brown, J Christie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individuals who sustain a low-energy fracture are at increased risk of sustaining a subsequent low-energy fracture. The incidence of these refractures may be reduced by secondary preventative measures, although justifying such interventions and evaluating their impact is difficult without substantive evidence of the severity of the refracture risk. The aim of this study was to quantify the risk of sustaining another fracture following a low-energy fracture compared with the risk in an age and sex-matched reference population.
METHODS: During the twelve-year period between January 1988 and December 1999, all inpatient and outpatient fracture-treatment events were prospectively audited in a trauma unit that is the sole source of fracture treatment for a well-defined local catchment population. During this time, 22,060 patients at least forty-five years of age who had sustained a total of 22,494 low-energy fractures of the hip, wrist, proximal part of the humerus, or ankle were identified. All refracture events were linked to the index fracture in the database during the twelve-year period. The incidence of refracture in the cohort of patients who had sustained a previous fracture was divided by the "background" incidence of index fractures within the same local population to obtain the relative risk of refracture. Person-years at-risk methodology was used to control for the effect of the expected increase in mortality with advancing age.
RESULTS: Within the cohort, 2913 patients (13.2%) subsequently sustained a total of 3024 refractures during the twelve-year period. Patients with a previous low-energy fracture had a relative risk of 3.89 of sustaining a subsequent low-energy fracture. The relative risk was significantly increased for both sexes, but it was greater for men (relative risk = 5.55) than it was for women (relative risk = 2.94). The relative risk was 5.23 in the youngest age cohort (patients between forty-five and forty-nine years of age), and it decreased with increasing age to 1.20 in the oldest cohort (patients at least eighty-five years of age).
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who sustain a low-energy fracture between the ages of forty-five and eighty-four years have an increased relative risk of sustaining another low-energy fracture. This increased risk was greater when the index fracture occurred earlier in life; the risk decreased with advancing age. Secondary preventative measures designed to reduce the risk of refracture following a low-energy fracture are likely to have a greater impact on younger individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12208908     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200209000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  31 in total

1.  Knowledge of orthopaedic surgeons in managing patients with fragility fracture.

Authors:  Reza Sorbi; Mohamad Reza Aghamirsalim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Second fractures among older adults in the year following hip, shoulder, or wrist fracture.

Authors:  J P W Bynum; J-E Bell; R V Cantu; Q Wang; C M McDonough; D Carmichael; T D Tosteson; A N A Tosteson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Bone healing in an aged murine fracture model is characterized by sustained callus inflammation and decreased cell proliferation.

Authors:  John H Hebb; Jason W Ashley; Lee McDaniel; Luke A Lopas; John Tobias; Kurt D Hankenson; Jaimo Ahn
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  A randomized study of two different information-based interventions on the management of osteoporosis in minimal and moderate trauma fractures.

Authors:  D Bliuc; J A Eisman; J R Center
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Fracture liaison services for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture: a cost-effectiveness evaluation based on data collected over 8 years of service provision.

Authors:  A R McLellan; S E Wolowacz; E A Zimovetz; S M Beard; S Lock; L McCrink; F Adekunle; D Roberts
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Do the hospitalized patients with osteoporotic fractures require endocrinologists' help?

Authors:  M Aghamirsalim; R Sorbi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 7.  Exercise prescription after fragility fracture in older adults: a scoping review.

Authors:  L M Feehan; C A Beck; S R Harris; D L MacIntyre; L C Li
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Multinational survey of osteoporotic fracture management.

Authors:  Karsten E Dreinhöfer; Mary Anderson; Jean-Marc Féron; Antonio Herrera; Robert Hube; Olof Johnell; Lars Lidgren; Kim Miles; Umberto Tarantino; Hamish Simpson; W Angus Wallace
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Role of quantitative ultrasound to predict fracture among institutionalised older people with a history of fracture.

Authors:  J S Chen; L M March; R G Cumming; I D Cameron; J M Simpson; S R Lord; P N Sambrook
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Management of osteoporosis in primary care in Australia.

Authors:  J S Chen; C Hogan; G Lyubomirsky; P N Sambrook
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.