Lina Gölz1, Anna Christine Knickenberg2, Ludger Keilig2,3, Susanne Reimann2, Spyridon N Papageorgiou1,2, Andreas Jäger1, Christoph Bourauel4. 1. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. 2. Department of Oral Technology, School of Dentistry, University of Bonn, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111, Bonn, Germany. 3. Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Preclinical Education and Materials Science, School of Dentistry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. 4. Department of Oral Technology, School of Dentistry, University of Bonn, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111, Bonn, Germany. bourauel@uni-bonn.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Orthodontic appliances are considered to be highly biocompatible although adverse effects attributed to the release of nickel ions (Ni(2+)) have been documented. Self-ligating brackets have grown in popularity for economic reasons and supposed friction reduction. The aim of the present prospective cohort study was therefore to determine salivary Ni(2+) concentrations in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with self-ligating fixed appliances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A group of 30 patients between 10 and 13 years of age were treated with self-ligating brackets (SmartClip™), molar bands, and nickel-titanium (NiTi) archwires. Unstimulated saliva samples were collected after different time points (before treatment, after self-ligating bracket and band placement, before archwire insertion, after archwire insertion, and finally 4 and 8 weeks afterwards) and analyzed with an ICP mass spectrometer followed by generalized estimating equation modelling with α = 5 %. RESULTS: The baseline median salivary Ni(2+) concentration was 21.85 µg/l, while the Ni(2+) concentrations at the following visits ranged between 13.73 and 85.34 µg/l. Significant increases in Ni(2+) levels compared to the baseline levels were detected after band/bracket placement [+59.76 µg/l; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 44.88-74.64 µg/l; P < 0.001] and after archwire insertion (+53.55 µg/l; 95 % CI 25.57-81.52 µg/l; P < 0.001). After 4 weeks, Ni(2+) concentrations returned to initial control levels or were lower. CONCLUSION: Self-ligating orthodontic appliances may affect salivary Ni(2+) concentrations in vivo over the short term. However, levels resembled those documented in conjunction with conventional bracket use and remained below the daily dietary Ni intake.
OBJECTIVE: Orthodontic appliances are considered to be highly biocompatible although adverse effects attributed to the release of nickel ions (Ni(2+)) have been documented. Self-ligating brackets have grown in popularity for economic reasons and supposed friction reduction. The aim of the present prospective cohort study was therefore to determine salivary Ni(2+) concentrations in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with self-ligating fixed appliances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A group of 30 patients between 10 and 13 years of age were treated with self-ligating brackets (SmartClip™), molar bands, and nickel-titanium (NiTi) archwires. Unstimulated saliva samples were collected after different time points (before treatment, after self-ligating bracket and band placement, before archwire insertion, after archwire insertion, and finally 4 and 8 weeks afterwards) and analyzed with an ICP mass spectrometer followed by generalized estimating equation modelling with α = 5 %. RESULTS: The baseline median salivary Ni(2+) concentration was 21.85 µg/l, while the Ni(2+) concentrations at the following visits ranged between 13.73 and 85.34 µg/l. Significant increases in Ni(2+) levels compared to the baseline levels were detected after band/bracket placement [+59.76 µg/l; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 44.88-74.64 µg/l; P < 0.001] and after archwire insertion (+53.55 µg/l; 95 % CI 25.57-81.52 µg/l; P < 0.001). After 4 weeks, Ni(2+) concentrations returned to initial control levels or were lower. CONCLUSION: Self-ligating orthodontic appliances may affect salivary Ni(2+) concentrations in vivo over the short term. However, levels resembled those documented in conjunction with conventional bracket use and remained below the daily dietary Ni intake.
Authors: Robert L Rietschel; Joseph F Fowler; Erin M Warshaw; Donald Belsito; Vincent A DeLeo; Howard I Maibach; James G Marks; C G Toby Mathias; Melanie Pratt; Denis Sasseville; Frances J Storrs; James S Taylor; Kathryn A Zug Journal: Dermatitis Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.845