Literature DB >> 26910420

Benefits and Limitations of Low-kV Macromolecular Imaging of Frozen-Hydrated Biological Samples.

Endre Majorovits1, Isabel Angert1, Ute Kaiser2, Rasmus R Schröder3.   

Abstract

Object contrast is one of the most important parameters of macromolecular imaging. Low-voltage transmission electron microscopy has shown an increased atom contrast for carbon materials, indicating that amplitude contrast contributions increase at a higher rate than phase contrast and inelastic scattering. Here, we studied image contrast using ice-embedded tobacco mosaic virus particles as test samples at 20-80 keV electron energy. The particles showed the expected increase in contrast for lower energies, but at the same time the 2.3-nm-resolution measure decayed more rapidly. We found a pronounced signal loss below 60 keV, and therefore we conclude that increased inelastic scattering counteracts increased amplitude contrast. This model also implies that as long as the amplitude contrast does not increase with resolution, beam damage and multiple scattering will always win over increased contrast at the lowest energies. Therefore, we cannot expect that low-energy imaging of conventionally prepared samples would provide better data than state-of-the-art 200-300 keV imaging.
Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26910420      PMCID: PMC4776044          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  20 in total

1.  Optimum HRTEM image contrast at 20 kV and 80 kV--exemplified by graphene.

Authors:  Z Lee; J C Meyer; H Rose; U Kaiser
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 2.689

2.  40 keV atomic resolution TEM.

Authors:  David C Bell; Christopher J Russo; Dmitry V Kolmykov
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Direct imaging of lattice atoms and topological defects in graphene membranes.

Authors:  Jannik C Meyer; C Kisielowski; R Erni; Marta D Rossell; M F Crommie; A Zettl
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 11.189

4.  Transmission electron microscopy at 20 kV for imaging and spectroscopy.

Authors:  U Kaiser; J Biskupek; J C Meyer; J Leschner; L Lechner; H Rose; M Stöger-Pollach; A N Khlobystov; P Hartel; H Müller; M Haider; S Eyhusen; G Benner
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Volta potential phase plate for in-focus phase contrast transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  Radostin Danev; Bart Buijsse; Maryam Khoshouei; Jürgen M Plitzko; Wolfgang Baumeister
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Control of radiation damage in the TEM.

Authors:  R F Egerton
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.689

7.  Ecology. Bacterial vesicles in the ocean.

Authors:  David Scanlan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Zero-loss image formation and modified contrast transfer theory in EFTEM.

Authors:  I Angert; E Majorovits; R R Schröder
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.689

9.  Zernike phase contrast cryo-electron microscopy and tomography for structure determination at nanometer and subnanometer resolutions.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Murata; Xiangan Liu; Radostin Danev; Joanita Jakana; Michael F Schmid; Jonathan King; Kuniaki Nagayama; Wah Chiu
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  2.2 Å resolution cryo-EM structure of β-galactosidase in complex with a cell-permeant inhibitor.

Authors:  Alberto Bartesaghi; Alan Merk; Soojay Banerjee; Doreen Matthies; Xiongwu Wu; Jacqueline L S Milne; Sriram Subramaniam
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.