Literature DB >> 26908243

Are Routine Blood Group and Save Samples Needed for Laparoscopic Day Case Surgery?

Peter M Thomson1, Jack Ross2, Samrat Mukherjee2, Borzoueh Mohammadi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Common day case laparoscopic procedures are usually safe, with low rates of bleeding complications. At our trust, most patients undergo pre-operative group and save (G&S) for these procedures, at a cost of £18.39 per sample excluding laboratory staffing costs. Our aim was to assess if routine G&S is indicated.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIH) and diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) in our institution between April 2012 and March 2014. Patients were identified using hospital coding records. Transfusion department records were reviewed to see which patients had undergone pre-operative G&S or cross-match, and peri-operative transfusion.
RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-two procedures were performed in 2 years: 293 LC, 123 LIH and 116 DL. G&S was performed in 256 (87 %; LC), 67 (54 %; LIH) and 88 (76 %; DL), respectively. Zero patients were transfused for bleeding complications. One patient was transfused following diagnostic laparoscopy to optimise pre-existing anaemia. The total cost of G&S over the study period was £7558.
CONCLUSION: Blood transfusion rates for bleeding complications following laparoscopic day case surgery are 0 % in our unit. G&S samples for these procedures cost £7558 over 2 years. Abandoning pre-operative G&S for these patients appears to be clinically indicated and would lead to substantial financial savings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26908243     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3463-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  33 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidents and complications. A retrospective analysis of 9542 consecutive laparoscopic operations.

Authors:  S Duca; O Bãlã; N Al-Hajjar; C Lancu; I C Puia; D Munteanu; F Graur
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Laparoscopic total colectomy using left-to-right dissection: comparison with the conventional open approach.

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.719

3.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  A study of pre-operative type and screen in breast surgery: improved efficiency and cost saving.

Authors:  R S Prichard; M O'Keefe; R McLaughlin; C Malone; K J Sweeney; M J Kerin
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Routine pre-operative cross-match for elective colorectal resections: an appropriate use of resources?

Authors:  Jagdeep K Singh; Pritam Singh
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.392

Review 6.  Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: A meta-analysis based on seven randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yuan Deng; Yan Zhang; Tian-Kang Guo
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.279

7.  Major complications of operative and diagnostic laparoscopy for gynecologic disease.

Authors:  P H Wang; W L Lee; C C Yuan; H T Chao; W M Liu; K J Yu; W Y Tsai; K C Wang
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  2001-02

Review 8.  The role of staging laparoscopy for intraabdominal cancers: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  L Chang; D Stefanidis; W S Richardson; D B Earle; R D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: outcomes analysis of 266 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Charles J Dolce; Jennifer E Keller; K Christian Walters; Daniel Griffin; H James Norton; B Todd Heniford; Kent W Kercher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Cost effectiveness of routine type and screen testing before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  H Usal; J Nabagiez; P Sayad; G S Ferzli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  1 in total

1.  Requirement of preoperative blood typing for cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael G Fadel; Ishaan Patel; Lawrence O'Leary; Nebil Behar; James Brewer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 2.895

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.