Literature DB >> 21197587

A study of pre-operative type and screen in breast surgery: improved efficiency and cost saving.

R S Prichard1, M O'Keefe, R McLaughlin, C Malone, K J Sweeney, M J Kerin.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients undergoing major breast surgery have an almost negligible need for blood transfusions. However, type and screen requests are still routinely performed. This represents an inefficient utilization of resources and unnecessary workload for laboratory staff. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether pre-operative blood typing is justified in patients undergoing surgical procedures with an intermediate transfusion probability.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing a mastectomy and axillary clearance, with or without breast reconstruction in the last 2 years was undertaken. The number of group and hold and cross-match samples that were performed were identified and compared to the number of patients requiring a blood transfusion. The overall cost of routine pre-operative blood typing was analysed.
RESULTS: A total of 229 patients were identified. Of these, a group and hold was performed on 192 (83.8%) patients. Cross-matching was undertaken in thirty-one patients (13.5%). In total, five patients (2.1%) required transfusion. No patient was transfused intra-operatively. The overall cost of routine group and hold blood requests was 1,920 euros and of pre-operative cross-matching was 465 euros. Forty-seven units of blood was returned unused to the blood transfusion service at an estimated cost of 23,500 euros.
CONCLUSION: The need for routine group and hold blood requests is not justified for patients undergoing elective breast surgery and represents a waste of clinical resources. A more targeted approach will not only reduce the demand on blood products but also reduce the associated costs to blood transfusion services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21197587     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-010-0668-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  15 in total

1.  A study of blood cross-matching requirements for surgery in gynecological oncology: improved efficiency and cost saving.

Authors:  C L Foley; T Mould; J E Kennedy; D P J Barton
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  Blood transfusion requirements in bimaxillary osteotomies.

Authors:  D K Dhariwal; A J Gibbons; M A Kittur; A W Sugar
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.651

3.  Revisiting of preoperative blood ordering policy--a single institute's experience in Taiwan.

Authors:  Jeong-Shi Lin; Ying-Ju Chen; Cheng-Hwai Tzeng; Jau-Yi Lyou; Chen-Hsen Lee
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.743

4.  Maximum surgical blood ordering schedule in a district general hospital saves money and resources.

Authors:  N G Richardson; W N Bradley; D R Donaldson; D F O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Hospital-wide educational program decreases red blood cell transfusions.

Authors:  J P Rehm; P S Otto; W W West; J J Grange; B G Halloran; T G Lynch; B T Baxter
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Successful implementation of Maximum Surgical Blood Order Schedule.

Authors:  T A Lowery; J A Clark
Journal:  J Med Assoc Ga       Date:  1989-03

7.  Validation of a clinical prediction rule to reduce preoperative type and screen procedures.

Authors:  W A van Klei; K G M Moons; A T Rheineck-Leyssius; C J Kalkman; C L G Rutten; J T A Knape; D E Grobbee
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  The efficacy of type and screen to reduce unnecessary cross matches for obstetric patients.

Authors:  P M Ness; M E Rosche; C Barrasso; R D Luff; J W Johnson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-07-15       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  The sustained impact of a group and screen and maximum surgical blood ordering schedule policy on the transfusion practice in gynaecology and obstetrics.

Authors:  H I Atrah; G Galea; S J Urbaniak
Journal:  Clin Lab Haematol       Date:  1995-06

10.  An audit on the blood transfusion requirements for revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Sharma; H Cooper; J P Ivory
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.891

View more
  1 in total

1.  Are Routine Blood Group and Save Samples Needed for Laparoscopic Day Case Surgery?

Authors:  Peter M Thomson; Jack Ross; Samrat Mukherjee; Borzoueh Mohammadi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.