Literature DB >> 9918617

Cost effectiveness of routine type and screen testing before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

H Usal1, J Nabagiez, P Sayad, G S Ferzli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of routine preoperative blood type and screen testing before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: All 2,589 laparoscopic cholecystectomies and 603 open cholecystectomies performed at our institution between January 1990 and December 1996 were retrospectively reviewed to identify the incidence and causes of blood transfusions. With the use of ICD-9-CM coding, a computerized retrospective research was done to match the corresponding codes for the aforementioned operations and blood transfusion. Individual charts were reviewed to identify the indications for blood transfusion.
RESULTS: Of the 2,589 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed, 12 patients required blood transfusion, and of the 603 open cholecystectomies, 33 patients required blood transfusion. The incidence of blood transfusions was 0.46% for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 5.47% for open cholecystectomy. Two of the blood transfusions given intraoperatively were due to major vascular injury in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. The remaining blood transfusions were found to be the result of preexisting medical conditions including sickle-cell anemia, end-stage renal disease, and chronic iron deficiency anemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become a widely used therapeutic modality in general surgery. The procedure is safe, effective, and well tolerated by the patient. In the era of managed healthcare, the cost effectiveness of commonly ordered tests is frequently questioned. In the absence of preoperative indications, routine preoperative blood type and screen testing should be eliminated for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The elimination of routine preoperative blood type and screen testing could have saved our institution $79,800 during a 6-year period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9918617     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  6 in total

1.  Are Routine Blood Group and Save Samples Needed for Laparoscopic Day Case Surgery?

Authors:  Peter M Thomson; Jack Ross; Samrat Mukherjee; Borzoueh Mohammadi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Are blood group and save samples needed for cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Martha Quinn; Stuart Suttie; Alan Li; Rajan Ravindran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Routine blood group and antibody screening prior to emergency laparoscopy.

Authors:  J Barrett-Lee; J Vatish; M Vazirian-Zadeh; P Waterland
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Routine preoperative typing and screening: a safeguard or a misuse of resources.

Authors:  Silvio Fabian Ghirardo; Ishwaria Mohan; Alicia Gomensoro; Mitchell I Chorost
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Requirement of preoperative blood typing for cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael G Fadel; Ishaan Patel; Lawrence O'Leary; Nebil Behar; James Brewer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Examining the Utility and Cost of Routine Type and Screen Prior to Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Anne Tjaden; Nicolette Codispoti; Linda C Yang; Thythy Pham
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.