Literature DB >> 16498438

Quantitative analysis of corneal microstructure in keratoconus utilising in vivo confocal microscopy.

K H Weed1, C J MacEwen, A Cox, C N J McGhee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish and quantify the in vivo confocal microscopic features of moderate to advanced keratoconus.
METHODS: Nineteen keratoconus subjects were catergorised using Orbscan-derived corneal apex power and pachymetry as exhibiting moderate (n=7) and advanced (n=12) keratoconus. Control subjects included 23 noncontact lens wearers (Group A) and 15 contact lens wearers (Group B). All subjects underwent Confoscan slit scanning in vivo confocal microscopy.
RESULTS: Compared with Group A (4912+/-434 cells/mm(2)), basal epithelial density was significantly lower in both moderate (4592+/-414 cells/mm(2), P<0.05) and advanced keratoconus (4530+/-596 cells/mm(2), P=0.01). In comparison to Group A (761+/-118 cells/mm(2)), anterior stroma keratocyte density was significantly greater in both moderate keratoconus (883+/-111 cells/mm(2), P=0.001) and advanced keratoconus (952+/-122 cells/mm(2), P<0.001). Compared to Group A (504+/-80 cells/mm(2)) posterior stroma keratocyte density was also significantly greater in advanced keratoconus (599+/-97 cells/mm(2), P<0.001) and posterior stromal keratocyte density appeared to increase with increasing severity of keratoconus (P<0.05). However, comparing control Groups A and B, contact lens wear per se, was associated with significantly reduced (P=0.000) keratocyte density in the anterior stroma (609+/-66 cells/mm(2)) and demonstrated a trend (P=0.056) in the posterior stroma (470+/-63 cells/mm(2)). Keratoconic corneas (429+/-72 microm) were significantly thinner than control Groups A (508+/-77 mm) and B (495+/-80 microm). The presence of keratoconus did not affect the endothelial cell density (P=0.54).
CONCLUSION: In vivo confocal microscopy can provide insight into the microstructural changes that occur in keratoconus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16498438     DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  21 in total

Review 1.  Corneal injury: Clinical and molecular aspects.

Authors:  Brayden Barrientez; Sarah E Nicholas; Amy Whelchel; Rabab Sharif; Jesper Hjortdal; Dimitrios Karamichos
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Histopathologic findings of keratoconus corneas underwent penetrating keratoplasty according to topographic measurements and keratoconus severity.

Authors:  Mohammad Naderan; Ali Jahanrad; Siavash Balali
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  In vivo confocal microscopy of the corneal endothelium: comparison of three morphometry methods after corneal transplantation.

Authors:  S Jonuscheit; M J Doughty; K Ramaesh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  In vivo corneal confocal microscopic analysis in patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  Gulfidan Bitirgen; Ahmet Ozkagnici; Banu Bozkurt; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Effects of contact lens wearing on keratoconus: a confocal microscopy observation.

Authors:  Somnath Ghosh; Haliza A Mutalib; Rituparna Ghoshal; Shamala Retnasabapathy
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 6.  Current perspectives in the management of keratoconus with contact lenses.

Authors:  Li Lim; Elizabeth Wen Ling Lim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  In vivo ocular imaging of the cornea of the normal female laboratory beagle using confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Ann R Strom; Dennis E Cortés; Sara M Thomasy; Philip H Kass; Mark J Mannis; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 1.644

8.  Corneal Cell Morphology in Keratoconus: A Confocal Microscopic Observation.

Authors:  Somnath Ghosh; Haliza Abdul Mutalib; Sharanjeet Kaur; Rituparna Ghoshal; Shamala Retnasabapathy
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2017-04-14

Review 9.  In vivo confocal microscopy of the ocular surface: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Edoardo Villani; Christophe Baudouin; Nathan Efron; Pedram Hamrah; Takashi Kojima; Sanjay V Patel; Stephen C Pflugfelder; Andrey Zhivov; Murat Dogru
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.424

10.  Immunohistochemical expression of Fas ligand (FasL) and neprilysin (neutral endopeptidase/CD10) in keratoconus.

Authors:  Eiman Adel Hasby; Hisham Adel Saad
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 2.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.