| Literature DB >> 26904513 |
Deepak S Ipe1, Ella Horton1, Glen C Ulett1.
Abstract
Bacteriuria, the presence of bacteria in urine, is associated with asymptomatic, as well as symptomatic, urinary tract infection (UTI). Bacteriuria underpins some of the dynamics of microbial colonization of the urinary tract, and probably impacts the progression and persistence of infection in some individuals. Recent molecular discoveries in vitro have elucidated how some key bacterial traits can enable organisms to survive and grow in human urine as a means of microbial fitness adaptation for UTI. Several microbial characteristics that confer bacteruric potential have been identified including de novo synthesis of guanine, relative resistance to D-serine, and catabolism of malic acid. Microbial characteristics such as these are increasingly being defined through the use of synthetic human urine (SHU) in vitro as a model to mimic the in vivo environment that bacteria encounter in the bladder. There is considerable variation in the SHU model systems that have been used to study bacteriuria to date, and this influences the utility of these models. In this review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of bacteruric potential with a focus on the specific mechanisms underlying traits that promote the growth of bacteria in urine. We also review the application of SHU in research studies modeling UTI and discuss the chemical makeup, and benefits and limitations that are encountered in utilizing SHU to study bacterial growth in urine in vitro.Entities:
Keywords: artificial urine; asymptomatic bacteriuria; bacteriuria; synthetic human urine; urinalysis; urinary tract infection; urine; uropathogen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26904513 PMCID: PMC4744864 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Summary of traits that contribute to bacteruric potential in microbes.
| Ability to utilize human urine as a substrate for growth | Gordon and Riley, | |
| Shepard and Gilmore, | ||
| Nickel et al., | ||
| Nickel et al., | ||
| Storer et al., | ||
| Sakinç et al., | ||
| Ipe et al., | ||
| Tolerance to high levels of D-serine | Sakinç et al., | |
| Requirement for | Hryckowian et al., | |
| Capacity for synthesis of guanine-dependent products critical for survival in urine | Russo et al., | |
| Expression of iron acquisition systems for growth in nutrient limiting environment | Alteri and Mobley, | |
| Vebø et al., | ||
| Osmoadaption, and intracellular accumulation of glycine betaine | Chambers and Lever, | |
| Adaptation of central metabolism to lactate, citrate and amino acids as carbon sources; flux through pyruvate metabolism, TCA cycle | Tielen et al., | |
| Malic acid metabolism | Ipe et al., |
Original and subsequent studies using Synthetic Human Urine (SHU) (A), and related SHU constituents, and proposed composite SHU (B).
| 1. Physiology (Aurora et al., | Understanding the development of calcium oxalate monohydrate precipitation | N/A | Urolithiasis | Mayrovitz and Sims, |
| 2. Infection (Brooks and Keevil, | Development of SHU to investigate the growth of urinary pathogens | UTI | Darouiche et al., | |
| 3. Physiology (Burns and Finlayson, | Description of standard SHU for | N/A | Urolithiasis | Brown et al., |
| 4. Cell Biology (Chutipongtanate and Thongboonkerd, | Comparison of multiple SHU media, and study in epithelial cell culture assays | Kidney epithelial cells | Cell Biology | |
| 5. Infection and Physiology (Griffith et al., | Investigation of infection-induced urinary stones | UTI, and Urolithiasis | Davis et al., | |
| 6. Infection (Minuth et al., | Measurement of the antimicrobial efficacy of gentamicin in SHU | UTI | Mansouri and Darouiche, | |
| 7. Physiology (Putnam et al., | Characterization of urinary constituents | N/A | General | No citations published |
| 8. Physiology (Gardner and Doremus, | Study of calcium oxalate crystallization | N/A | Urolithiasis | Robertson et al., |
| NaCl | 8/8 | 113.3 (54–231) mM | 100 mM | Griffith et al., |
| Na2SO4 | 8/8 | 17.0 (9.0–155,800) mM | 17.0 mM | Griffith et al., |
| pH | 7/8 | 6.0 (5.7–7.2) | 5.5–6.0 | Griffith et al., |
| Urea | 6/8 | 281 (170–500) mM | 280 mM | Griffith et al., |
| KCl | 6/8 | 58.5 (21.5–162.7) mM | 38.0 mM | Griffith et al., |
| CaCl2 | 6/8 | 5.3 (2.5–12.0) mM | 4.0 mM | Griffith et al., |
| Creatinine | 5/8 | 8.7 (4.0–13.2) mM | 9.0 mM | Griffith et al., |
| Na3C6H5O7 | 5/8 | 3.4 (2.2–5.0) mM | 3.4 mM | Griffith et al., |
| NH4Cl | 5/8 | 36.6 (15.0–86.8) mM | 20.0 mM | Griffith et al., |
| MgSO4 | 5/8 | 3.2 (2.0–5.9) mM | 3.2 mM | Aurora et al., |
| Na2C2O4 | 5/8 | 0.38 (0.1–1.2) mM | 0.18 mM | Griffith et al., |
| NaH2PO4 | 4/8 | 20.9 (3.6–43.6) mM | 3.6 mM | Aurora et al., |
| Na2HPO4 | 4/8 | 6.5 (6.1–186,800) mM | 6.5 mM | Gardner and Doremus, |
| KH2PO4 | 3/8 | 16.0 (7.0–20.6) mM | 16.0 mM | Griffith et al., |
| C5H4N4O3 | 3/8 | 0.6 (0.4–1.0) mM | 0.6 mM | Aurora et al., |
| NaHCO3 | 2/8 | 13.5 (2.0–25.0) mM | 13.5 mM | Brooks and Keevil, |
| MgCl2.6H2O | 2/8 | 3.2 (3.2) mM | 3.2 mM | Griffith et al., |
| Osmolality | 2/8 | 586 (446–725) mOsm/kg | 600 mOsm/kg | Minuth et al., |
| C6H8O7 | 2/8 | 1.7 (1.4–2.0) mM | – | Aurora et al., |
| TSB | 2/8 | 2.0% (1.0–5.0%) (v/v) | – | Griffith et al., |
| NH3OH | 1/8 | 17.1 mM | – | Aurora et al., |
| C9H9NO3 | 1/8 | 2.8 mM | – | Aurora et al., |
| K2HPO4 | 1/8 | 7.0 mM | – | Brooks and Keevil, |
| C3H6O3 | 1/8 | 1.1 mM | 1.1 mM | Brooks and Keevil, |
| FeSO4.7H2O | 1/8 | 0.005 mM | 0.005 mM | Brooks and Keevil, |
| K3C6H5O7 | 1/8 | 2752000 mM | – | Gardner and Doremus, |
| Mg(NO3)2 | 1/8 | 2.5 mM | – | Gardner and Doremus, |
| Peptone | 1/8 | 0.1% (w/v) | – | Brooks and Keevil, |
| Yeast extract | 1/8 | 0.0005% (w/v) | – | Brooks and Keevil, |
| Glucose | 0/8 | 1.0% (0.3–2.0%) (w/v) | – | Uppuluri et al., |
| Sucrose | 0/8 | 0.002% (w/v) | – | Wernli et al., |
| Lactose | 0/8 | 0.002% (w/v) | – | Wernli et al., |
| LB | 0/8 | 3.5% (2.5–5.0%) (v/v) | – | Martino et al., |
| Dextrose | 0/8 | 3.4% (0.3–8.0%) (w/v) | – | Domergue et al., |
| THB | 0/8 | 2.5% (v/v) | – | Ipe et al., |
| YNB | 0/8 | 5.0% (5.0–5.0%) (v/v) | – | Jain et al., |
| SC Broth | 0/8 | 5.0% (v/v) | – | Domergue et al., |
| Nutrient Broth | 0/8 | 1.2% (0.4–2.0%) (v/v) | – | Wenzler-Röttele et al., |
| Gelatine | 0/8 | 1.0% (w/v) | – | Wenzler-Röttele et al., |
| Casamino Acids, Bacto | 0/8 | – | 0.1% (v/v) |
Original study of Robinson et al. (1984) cited by Lee et al. (1995) does not provide a recipe;
Reference(s) included in original study (minimal recipe details in reference citing original study);
Original studies of Brooks and Keevil (1997) and Grases and Llobera (1998) cited by Chutipongtanate and Thongboonkerd (2010) provide a recipe;
Cited by: these references cite the immediate preceding reference rather than the original study;
The number of original studies (n/8) that defined the component in their SHU recipe;
Refers to Average Concentration, and (Concentration Range). Study of Robertson and Scurr (1986) was used to calculate Mean Concentration, and (Concentration Range) instead of Original Study of Putnam et al. (1971) because Putnam et al. (1971) does not provide a SHU recipe;
Proposed Composite SHU Media Concentrations are based on average values in referenced studies, and most compare closely to the typical human urine chemical composition as reported in Putnam et al. (1971) (e.g., NaCl 137 mM, Urea 223 mM, KCl 22 mM, Creatinine 13.3 mM, MgSO4 6.5 mM). In some cases (e.g., Na2HPO4, Na2SO4, KCl, Na2C2O4) the means and composite SHU values are chosen to exclude extreme upper range values from Gardner and Doremus (1978), Robertson and Scurr (1986).
References cited for components are original studies only, excepting for these components, for which all published studies using these components are cited. The proposed composite SHU omits Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB), peptone, LB, THB, and Nutrient Broth (undefined), Yeast Nitrogen Base (YNB) and Synthetic Complete (SC) Broth (for fungi), but includes 0.1% v/v Casamino Acids, Bacto (20% stock solution; BD) to attain a chemically defined minimal SHU medium, with the addition of 0.2% v/v (10% stock solution) yeast extract as a proposed supplement for fastidious bacteria including Streptococcus, or 2.0% w/v dextrose and 5.0% v/v YNB for fungi.