| Literature DB >> 31338112 |
Lauren K L Drage1,2,3, Wendy Robson4, Catherine Mowbray2, Ased Ali2,4,5,6, John D Perry7, Katherine E Walton7, Christopher Harding4, Robert Pickard4,5, Judith Hall2, Phillip D Aldridge1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Age is a significant risk factor for recurrent urinary tract (rUTI) infections, but the clinical picture is often confused in older patients who also present with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). Yet, how bacteriuria establishes in such patients and the factors underpinning and/or driving symptomatic UTI episodes are still not understood. To explore this further a pilot study was completed in which 30 male and female community based older patients (mean age 75y) presenting clinically with ASB / rUTIs and 15 control volunteers (72y) were recruited and monitored for up to 6 months. During this period symptomatic UTI episodes were recorded and urines collected for urinary cytokine and uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) analyses.Entities:
Keywords: Ageing; Antibiotics; Cytokines; Escherichia coli; Urinary tract infection
Year: 2019 PMID: 31338112 PMCID: PMC6625057 DOI: 10.1186/s12979-019-0156-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Immun Ageing ISSN: 1742-4933 Impact factor: 6.400
rUTI Demographic patient data
| Female ( | Male ( | ANOVA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 74.0 ± 5.5 | 76.7 ± 5.3 | 0.26 |
| UTI History | |||
| Confirmeda | 5.4 ± 2.7 | 3.1 ± 1.1 | |
| Urinary Tract Physiology | |||
| Normal | 16 | 3 | |
| Abnormalb | 7 | 4 | |
| Diabetic | 4 | 1 | |
| Oestrogen Use | |||
| Topical | 8 | N/A | |
| Systemic | 1 | N/A | |
| Structural Abnormalityb | |||
| Female | |||
| Vaginal prolapse | 5 | ||
| Urethral prolapse | 2 | ||
| Urethral stenosis | 2 | ||
| Male | |||
| Enlarged prostate | 3 | ||
| Phimosis | 1 | ||
| Trabeculated bladder | 2 | ||
aBased on clinical records that stated acute UTI (see Methods)
bPatients were included with one or more abnormalities
Fig. 1Recruitment Pathway for study and a Pilot study summary. Consort diagram of the study recruitment pathway. b Venn diagram of positive outcome data for the urine dipstick test (pink), patient self-assessment of symptoms (blue) and E. coli isolation at ≥105 CFU/ml (green). [ ] = patient number
Fig. 2Schematic representation of study data for seven rUTI patients. E. coli loads, antibiotic treatments and symptom reports are defined in the attached key. The numbers in the E. coli boxes represent the sequence types derived from the MLST analysis. a Case examples of patients who received antibiotics and did not present with urinary E. coli loads during the study. b Case examples of patients who did not receive antibiotic treatments but displayed urinary E. coli loads throughout the study. c Case examples of patients on short-term (3–7 day courses) of antibiotics. d Two case examples of patients on prophylactic antibiotics and where consistent E. coli loads were observed
E. coli sequence types (ST) isolated and sorted by isolation statistics
| Phylogroupa | Sequence Type | Frequency Isolatedb | Patientsc |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 677 | 9 | 2 |
| 3640 | 5 | 1 | |
| 442 | 2 | 1 | |
| 602 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1571 | 1 | 1 | |
| B2 | 73 | 54 | 9 |
| 12 | 15 | 4 | |
| 127 | 11 | 2 | |
| 420 | 11 | 1 | |
| 131 | 10 | 3 | |
| 404 | 8 | 1 | |
| 144 | 7 | 1 | |
| 95 | 6 | 2 | |
| 355 | 6 | 1 | |
| 91 | 5 | 1 | |
| 625 | 2 | 1 | |
| 681 | 2 | 1 | |
| 80 | 1 | 1 | |
| 421 | 1 | 1 | |
| 583 | 1 | 1 | |
| D | 69 | 12 | 6 |
| 362 | 2 | 1 | |
| 38 | 1 | 1 | |
| E | 335 | 1 | 1 |
| F | 354 | 9 | 1 |
| 59 | 1 | 1 |
aHistorical phylogroups or clades of the E. coli species utilized across the microbiology community [21]
bIsolation frequency based on how many times each sequence type (ST) was identified in the strain collection
cNumber of patients harbouring specific STs
Fig. 3Cytokine concentrations of the 360 rUTI patient (black dots) and 45 control (red dots) urine samples. Mean values are shown for patients with rUTI (yellow line (see key)) and urine from controls (green line). The plot uses a log scale on the y-axis to capture all data points with samples showing undetectable levels of each cytokine in the bottom panel. Only IL-1β, IL-5, IL-8 and IL-10 exhibited significantly elevated levels in patients compared to control samples: * ANOVA P < 0.05
rUTI patient cohort mean ± SD cytokine concentrations for IL-1, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 with respect to E. coli carriage
| Cytokine | Average Concentration | ANOVA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | |||
| IL-1 | 6.5 ± 14.9 | 8.7 ± 19.1 | 0.23 |
| IL-5 | 12.4 ± 30.0 | 9.5 ± 22.8 | 0.30 |
| IL-6 | 6.4 ± 27.9 | 6.3 ± 21.3 | 0.98 |
| IL-8 | 42.9 ± 104.8 | 74.0 ± 348.0 | 0.26 |
| IL-10 | 6.4 ± 12.2 | 9.1 ± 17.0 | 0.08 |
Fig. 4Urinary IL-10 concentrations of rUTI patients. X-axis reflects the longitudinal aspect of the study. In all four panels IL-10 concentrations from patients with no detectable E. coli (no E. coli) are shown as blue dots (see key). Mean values are shown for no E. coli in all panels as a black line. a no E. coli to < 105 CFU/ml E. coli (red dots; mean value: orange line) b no E. coli to > 105 CFU/ml E. coli was observed (green dots; mean value: orange line). c and d Focus on 11 rUTI patients with normal urinary tract physiology and/or no complicated medical history. Colours of dots, lines and comparisons are the same as in (a) and (b) and highlighted in the figure key. Statistical analysis and average concentrations of the data presented are found in Table 3
Mean ± SD IL-10 concentrations with respect to antibiotic treatment and E. coli carriage
| Condition | Average IL-10 Concentration (pg/ml) | ANOVA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
All rUTI Patients ( | No Antibiotics | 7.7 ± 15.4 | 0.85 | |
| Antibiotics | 8.0 ± 13.6 | |||
| No | 6.4 ± 12.2 | 0.56 | ||
| < 105 CFU/ml | 7.3 ± 10.1 | 0.21b | ||
| ≥ 105 CFU/ml | 10.5 ± 20.8 | 0.04* | ||
Patients without complicated urinary tract historya ( | No | 3.6 ± 8.2 | 0.3 | |
| < 105 CFU/ml | 6.0 ± 10.3 | 0.05b | ||
| ≥ 105 CFU/ml | 19.3 ± 27.5 | 0.00002* | ||
* P-value stated is for No E. coli versus ≥ 105 CFU/ml data sets
arUTI Patients recruited to study who were not diabetic, taking oestrogen supplements, or a previous clinical history of vaginal prolapse / prostate enlargement
bP-value stated is for < 105 CFU/ml versus ≥ 105 CFU/ml data sets
Fig. 5Urine concentrations of IL-6 in relation to a IL-8, b dipstick outcome and c self-declared symptoms. The highlighted region in (a) represents the required threshold for an acute UTI diagnosis based on IL-6 (> 25 pg/ml) and IL-8 (> 2000 pg/ml) as defined by Sunden et al. (2017). Both points shown in (a) are associated with patient UTI337 shown in Fig. 2c