Importance: Tens of thousands of unnecessary operations are performed each year for diagnostic purposes among patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. Whereas a diagnostic lobectomy is recommended for most patients with solitary indeterminate thyroid nodules, a total thyroidectomy is preferred for nodules larger than 4 cm. Objective: To determine whether histologic or clinical outcomes of indeterminate thyroid nodules 4 cm or larger are worse than those for nodules smaller than 4 cm, thus justifying a more aggressive initial surgical approach. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study, 652 indeterminate thyroid nodules (546 nodules <4 cm and 106 nodules ≥4 cm) with surgical follow-up were consecutively evaluated at an academic cancer center from October 1, 2008, through April 30, 2016. Exposure: Tumor size. Main Outcomes and Measures: Differences in cancer rates, rates of invasive features, cancer aggressiveness, and response to therapy between indeterminate thyroid nodules smaller than 4 cm and 4 cm or larger. Results: A total of 652 indeterminate thyroid nodules (546 nodules <4 cm and 106 nodules ≥4 cm) from 589 patients (mean [SD] age, 53.1 [13.8] years; 453 [76.9%] female) were studied. No differences were found in the baseline characteristics of patients or nodules between the 2 size groups. Tumor size was not associated with the cancer rate as a categorical (140 of 546 [25.6%] for nodules <4 cm and 33 of 106 [31.1%] for nodules ≥4 cm; effect size, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.002-0.12) or continuous (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.92-1.15) variable. No association was found between nodule size and prevalence of extrathyroidal extension, positive margins, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, or distant metastasis. Most malignant tumors were low risk in both size groups (70% in the nodules <4 cm and 72% in the nodules ≥4 cm), and tumor size was not associated with tumor aggressiveness as a categorical (effect size, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03-0.31) or continuous variable (OR for intermediate-risk cancer, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.72-1.14; OR for high-risk cancer, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.96-2.15). At the last follow-up visit, 88 of 105 patients (83.8%) with malignant tumors in the smaller than 4 cm group and 21 of 25 (84.0%) in the 4 cm or greater group had no evidence of disease, and tumor size was not associated with response to therapy (effect size, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.07-0.33). Conclusions and Relevance: Most indeterminate thyroid nodules are benign or low-risk malignant tumors regardless of tumor size. In the absence of other indications for total thyroidectomy, this study suggests that a thyroid lobectomy is sufficient initial treatment for most solitary cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules independent of the tumor size.
Importance: Tens of thousands of unnecessary operations are performed each year for diagnostic purposes among patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. Whereas a diagnostic lobectomy is recommended for most patients with solitary indeterminate thyroid nodules, a total thyroidectomy is preferred for nodules larger than 4 cm. Objective: To determine whether histologic or clinical outcomes of indeterminate thyroid nodules 4 cm or larger are worse than those for nodules smaller than 4 cm, thus justifying a more aggressive initial surgical approach. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study, 652 indeterminate thyroid nodules (546 nodules <4 cm and 106 nodules ≥4 cm) with surgical follow-up were consecutively evaluated at an academic cancer center from October 1, 2008, through April 30, 2016. Exposure: Tumor size. Main Outcomes and Measures: Differences in cancer rates, rates of invasive features, cancer aggressiveness, and response to therapy between indeterminate thyroid nodules smaller than 4 cm and 4 cm or larger. Results: A total of 652 indeterminate thyroid nodules (546 nodules <4 cm and 106 nodules ≥4 cm) from 589 patients (mean [SD] age, 53.1 [13.8] years; 453 [76.9%] female) were studied. No differences were found in the baseline characteristics of patients or nodules between the 2 size groups. Tumor size was not associated with the cancer rate as a categorical (140 of 546 [25.6%] for nodules <4 cm and 33 of 106 [31.1%] for nodules ≥4 cm; effect size, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.002-0.12) or continuous (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.92-1.15) variable. No association was found between nodule size and prevalence of extrathyroidal extension, positive margins, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, or distant metastasis. Most malignant tumors were low risk in both size groups (70% in the nodules <4 cm and 72% in the nodules ≥4 cm), and tumor size was not associated with tumor aggressiveness as a categorical (effect size, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03-0.31) or continuous variable (OR for intermediate-risk cancer, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.72-1.14; OR for high-risk cancer, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.96-2.15). At the last follow-up visit, 88 of 105 patients (83.8%) with malignant tumors in the smaller than 4 cm group and 21 of 25 (84.0%) in the 4 cm or greater group had no evidence of disease, and tumor size was not associated with response to therapy (effect size, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.07-0.33). Conclusions and Relevance: Most indeterminate thyroid nodules are benign or low-risk malignant tumors regardless of tumor size. In the absence of other indications for total thyroidectomy, this study suggests that a thyroid lobectomy is sufficient initial treatment for most solitary cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules independent of the tumor size.
Authors: Lisa A Radkay; Simion I Chiosea; Raja R Seethala; Steven P Hodak; Shane O LeBeau; Linwah Yip; Kelly L McCoy; Sally E Carty; Karen E Schoedel; Marina N Nikiforova; Yuri E Nikiforov; N Paul Ohori Journal: Cancer Cytopathol Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Kyle C Strickland; Brooke E Howitt; Ellen Marqusee; Erik K Alexander; Edmund S Cibas; Jeffrey F Krane; Justine A Barletta Journal: Thyroid Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: David A Kleiman; Matthew J Sporn; Toni Beninato; Michael J Crowley; Anvy Nguyen; Alessia Uccelli; Theresa Scognamiglio; Rasa Zarnegar; Thomas J Fahey Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ricardo V Lloyd; Lori A Erickson; Mary B Casey; King Y Lam; Christine M Lohse; Sylvia L Asa; John K C Chan; Ronald A DeLellis; H Ruben Harach; Kennichi Kakudo; Virginia A LiVolsi; Juan Rosai; Thomas J Sebo; Manuel Sobrinho-Simoes; Bruce M Wenig; Marick E Lae Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Yuri E Nikiforov; Sally E Carty; Simon I Chiosea; Christopher Coyne; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Robert L Ferris; William E Gooding; Steven P Hodak; Shane O LeBeau; N Paul Ohori; Raja R Seethala; Mitchell E Tublin; Linwah Yip; Marina N Nikiforova Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Whitney S Goldner; Trevor E Angell; Sallie Lou McAdoo; Joshua Babiarz; Peter M Sadow; Fadi A Nabhan; Christian Nasr; Richard T Kloos Journal: Thyroid Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Federico Cozzani; Dario Bettini; Matteo Rossini; Elena Bonati; Simona Nuzzo; Tommaso Loderer; Giuseppe Pedrazzi; Alberto Zaccaroni; Paolo Del Rio Journal: Updates Surg Date: 2021-06-07