Literature DB >> 26902456

Establishment and application of a new diagnostic definition of metabolic syndrome in the Shantou region of southern China.

Zan Ding1, Fuhua Pi2, Shengchao Zhang3, Wenya Dong1, Ye Wen1, Jiang Wu3, Qingying Zhang1.   

Abstract

The existing definitions of metabolic syndrome (MetS) may not be fully appropriate for the Shantou population because of ethnic and regional differences. We sought to establish a 95% multivariate medical reference range (MMRR) model for diagnosing MetS in Shantou adults and to evaluate the prevalence of MetS by the MMRR, JCDCG (the Chinese Guidelines), and International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria. A total of 4,580 participants were recruited in Shantou, southern China. We developed a MMRR model based on the combinatorial indicatrixes method for three categorized indicatrixes. According to the developed MMRR criteria, men (women) in Shantou have MetS by meeting 3 or more of the following: waist circumference ≥89 (81) cm; triglycerides level ≥1.73 (1.64) mmol/L; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level ≤1.07 (1.05) mmol/L; blood pressure ≥138/89 (136/85) mmHg; and fasting plasma glucose ≥5.8 (5.7) mmol/L. The agreement of the MMRR with JCDCG and IDF criteria was "substantial" (both κ > 0.68), but the recommended reference values and proportion of individual components of MetS defined by the 3 criteria differed. The population-based MMRR criteria may be appropriate for diagnosing MetS in Shantou population and the model might be useful for generalization to other geographic regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26902456      PMCID: PMC4763302          DOI: 10.1038/srep22210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a constellation of metabolic disorder components, including obesity (particularly central obesity), dyslipidemia (elevated level of triglycerides [TG] and/or lowered level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C]), hypertension or hyperglycaemia12; it is associated with the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus345, cardiovascular events6789, and death1011. Several definitions of MetS have been proposed by different organizations for clinical practice or research. In 1999, the World Health Organization proposed the first definition12, and in 2001, the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel formulated a working definition (NCEP-ATPIII)1314. In 2005, the American Heart Association and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute updated the NCEP-ATPIII definition for the diagnosis and management of MetS in adults1. During the same period, the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) released a clinically accessible worldwide uniform definition of MetS that could be used by any physician in any country, with ethnic-specific central obesity criteria as a prerequisite for diagnosis of MetS21516. In 2007, the Chinese Joint Committee for Developing Chinese Guidelines on Prevention and Treatment of Dyslipidemia in Adults (JCDCG) proposed another definition of MetS, focusing on metabolic disturbance in the Chinese population 17; limited information is available about the prevalence of MetS by the JCDCG definition18. Despite differences in cut-off points for metabolic disorder components, the core components (obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and glucose intolerance) among these definitions are similar, but the relative importance of the core components differs. The population of the Shantou region in southern China was approximately 13.94 million (7.06 million men) in 2010. People who reside in this area still retain their own dialect and have distinct dietary habits, lifestyles, and physical activity19. For example, oolong tea is the most widely consumed beverage in the Shantou region, and long-term oolong tea consumption is associated with reduced risk of dyslipidemia (reducted TG level and elevated HDL-C level)19. In addition, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), body weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) are lower in people from southern than northern China20. Ethnic and regional differences likely exist among populations across the world22122, and the various existing definitions of MetS may not be appropriate for the Shantou population. The diagnostic definition of MetS for Shantou adults should be based on the characteristics of metabolic disturbance in the Shantou region. This study aimed to establish and evaluate a 95% multivariate medical reference range (MMRR) model that may improve the sensitivity and specificity of MetS diagnosis and simplify the clinical diagnosis of MetS in the Shantou region. An additional aim was to estimate the prevalence of MetS among Shantou adults by comparing the developed MMRR diagnostic definition and the JCDCG and IDF definitions.

Methods

Study subjects

We conducted a population-based study of MetS in the Shantou region of southern China from January 2010 to June 2013 with 4,580 participants (3,062 men) aged 18 to 90 years. All participants were ≥18 years old, of Han nationality, and were Shantou natives who had been living in the area for at least 5 years before the survey. Immigrants, pregnant women, and people with serious heath problems (e.g., cancer, heart disease, and stroke) were excluded. Participants were randomly recruited from the chronic disease-monitoring sites in the health care centres of the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College and the Chaonan Minsheng Hospital of Shantou. This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College and Chaonan Minsheng Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Data collection

WC was measured by a trained physician who used a non-elastic tape at the horizontal plane between the inferior costal margin and the iliac crest on the midaxillary line, with subjects standing relaxed and wearing one layer of clothing. The same physician used a mercury sphygmomanometer to record blood pressure (BP) to the nearest 1 mmHg on the right upper limb with subjects in the sitting position. BP readings were taken at least 30 sec apart after participants had rested for 5 to 10 min. SBP and DBP were averaged from 3 measurements. Fasting blood samples were obtained by venipuncture in the early morning and all assessments were performed in the clinical laboratory at the hospitals. Blood plasma TG, HDL-C, and FPG concentrations were measured with the same batch reagents by an enzymatic method with a Beckman auto-analyzer (Beckman DXC800, Beckman Coulter, Inc.).

Definitions of MetS by the JCDCG and IDF criteria

According to the JCDCG definition1718, MetS is diagnosed with at least 3 of the 5 component risk factors (elevated WC, TG level, BP [SBP and/or DBP], and FPG, or reduced HDL-C level) (Table 1). With IDF diagnostic criteria216, MetS is diagnosed in a Chinese person with central obesity (increased WC) plus at least 2 other risk factors (Table 1). These criteria include 6 individual components of MetS (WC, TG, HDL-C, SBP, DBP, and FPG), which can be divided into 3 categories: WC, TG, and HDL-C for type I; SBP and DBP for type II; and FPG for type III.
Table 1

Definitions of metabolic syndrome (MetS) by the MMRR, JCDCG, and IDF diagnostic criteria.

Components of MetSMMRRJCDCGIDF
MenWomenMenWomenMenWomen
WC, cm≥89≥81>90>85≥90≥80
TG, mmol/L≥1.73 or specific treatment of TG abnormality≥1.64 or specific treatment of TG abnormality≥1.70≥1.70≥1.7 or specific treatment of TG abnormality≥1.7 or specific treatment of TG abnormality
HDL-C, mmol/L≤1.07 or specific treatment of HDL-C abnormality≤1.05 or specific treatment of HDL-C abnormality<1.04<1.04<1.03 or specific treatment of HDL-C abnormality<1.29 or specific treatment of HDL-C abnormality
BP, mmHgSBP ≥ 138 or DBP ≥ 89 or treatment of previously diagnosed hypertensionSBP ≥ 136 or DBP ≥ 85 or treatment of previously diagnosed hypertensionSBP ≥ 130 or DBP ≥ 85SBP ≥ 130 or DBP ≥ 85SBP ≥ 130 or DBP ≥ 85 or treatment of previously diagnosed hypertensionSBP ≥ 130 or DBP ≥ 85 or treatment of previously diagnosed hypertension
FPG, mmol/L ≥ 5.8 or previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes ≥ 5.7 or previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes ≥ 6.1 or 2-h plasma glucose ≥ 7.8 or diagnosed diabetes ≥ 6.1 or 2-h plasma glucose ≥ 7.8 or diagnosed diabetes ≥ 5.6 or previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes ≥ 5.6 or previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes
Required ≥ 3 risk factors ≥ 3 risk factors ≥ 3 risk factors ≥ 3 risk factorscentral obesity plus ≥ 2 other risk factorscentral obesity plus ≥ 2 other risk factors

MMRR, multivariate medical reference range; JCDCG, Chinese Joint Committee for Developing Chinese Guidelines; IDF, International Diabetes Federation; WC, waist circumference; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP/DBP, systolic/diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose.

Establishing a new diagnostic definition of MetS

The 95% univariate reference interval is commonly used in clinical studies as the standard tool for interpreting medical data2324. However, a well-known statistical dilemma appears with the simultaneous use of >1 univariate reference interval2325. The proportion of observations classified as abnormal increases with the 95% multiple univariate reference intervals25. For instance, a healthy person has an a priori 5% probability of abnormal values; the same person evaluated with 6 independent 95% univariate reference intervals will have an a priori probability of 1–0.956, or 26.5% probability abnormal values for all intervals. Thus, the probability of false-positive observations increases with number of univariate intervals, and one way to deal with this dilemma is the use of a multivariate reference model, which decreases the probability of both false-positive and false-negative observations2325. The classification of MetS requires meeting several individual components; therefore, the simultaneous interpretation of multiple risk factors for MetS should involvet a multivariate reference model (e.g., the 95% MMRR model) but not multiple univariate reference intervals from a statistical point of view. To establish a new diagnostic definition of MetS for the Shantou population, we randomly selected 800 “normal” participants (400 men and 400 women) from our sample during January to December in 2010, normal referring to subjects without hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidaemia history and not taking medications. The diagnostic definition was established separately for men and women. In our study, a novel method, the “combinatorial indicatrixes method for three categorized indicatrixes”, was developed by the authors for the 95% MMRR model, a multivariate reference model. The 6 component risk factors, or indicatrixes, of MetS (WC, TG, HDL-C, SBP, DBP, and FPG) could be grouped into 3 categorized indicatrixes: type I with 3 indicatrixes (WC, TG, and HDL-C) (n1 = 3), type II with 2 indicatrixes (SBP and DBP) (n2 = 2), and type III with 1 indicatrix (FPG) (n3 = 1), for n1, n2, and n3 indicatrixes for types I, II, and III, respectively. We assumed that each of the risk factors had the same a priori probability of being classified as abnormal, with abnormal rates labeled as q. A cut-off percentile (in this study, 95%) was selected to differentiate multivariate “normal” from “abnormal” results. MetS was defined as any of the following 4 situations: (1) type I with h abnormal indicatrixes (3 ≤ h ≤ n1); (2) type I with h abnormal indicatrixes (2 ≤ h < 3) and type III with k abnormal indicatrixes (0 < k ≤ n3); (3) type I with h abnormal indicatrixes (2 ≤ h < 3) and type II with j abnormal indicatrixes (0 < j ≤ n2); (4) type I with h abnormal indicatrixes (0 < h < 2), type II with j abnormal indicatrixes (0 < j ≤ n2), and type III with k abnormal indicatrixes (0 < k ≤ n3). The italics letters h, j, and k are the number of abnormal indicatrixes for types I, II, and III, respectively. Therefore, the 95% MMRR model for diagnosing MetS in the analysis was as follows: where n1 = 3, n2 = 2, n3 = 1, and P = 0.95. Then we obtained a function . We used the Newton’s iterative method with the desired accuracy of 10−10 to find an approximate real root of the nonlinear equation and then obtained the approximate real root (q = 0.140003) after 12 iterations. In other words, each of the 6 risk factors had an a priori probability of 14.0% of being classified as abnormal. Using a rank-based method (i.e., the percentile method), we obtained the cut-off points for 6 metabolic disorder components for diagnosing MetS in the Shantou population. MetS classification by the newly established MMRR criteria required at least 3 of the 5 component risk factors (abnormal WC, TG and HDL-C level, BP, and FPG). In reference to the IDF criteria, the following conditions were also included in the MMRR criteria: treatments for TG or HDL-C abnormality and previously diagnosed hypertension and type 2 diabetes.

Statistical analysis

The normal distribution of data was determined by the Shapiro–Wilk test. Significance for intergroup differences was assessed by the Mann–Whitney U test for skewed variables and Pearson’s chi-square test with or without Bonferroni correction for categorical variables. A chi-square test for trend was also performed. Categorical variables with percentages and continuous non-normally distributed variables are described with median (interquartile range [IQR]). Study subjects were divided into 6 age groups (18–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, and ≥70 years) to standardize the prevalence of MetS and analyze the association of MetS prevalence and age. Age- or sex-standardized prevalence rates were calculated according to the distribution of the Chinese population in the 2010 China population census by the direct standardization method. Cohen’s kappa was used to determine agreement between the MMRR and JCDCG, MMRR and IDF criteria; the degree of agreement was interpreted according to Landis and Koch26. All statistical analyses involved use of R 2.12.0 (http://www.R-project.org, the R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), with the fmsb package used to calculate values. Two-tailed tests of significance were reported, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

Newly established MMRR criteria for MetS

According to the developed MMRR criteria, men (women) in the Shantou region had MetS by meeting ≥3 of the following abnormalities: WC ≥ 89 (81) cm; TG level ≥ 1.73 (1.64) mmol/L or specific treatment for TG abnormality; HDL-C level ≤ 1.07 (1.05) mmol/L or specific treatment for HDL-C abnormality; BP ≥ 138/89 (136/85) mmHg or treatment for previously diagnosed hypertension; and FPG ≥ 5.8 (5.7) mmol/L or previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes (Table 1).

Sample characteristics

The baseline characteristics of the study population by gender are in Table 2. A total of 4,580 Shantou adults were recruited, with median age 44.0 years (IQR 36.0–57.0). Men were younger than women and had significantly higher WC, TG level, SBP, and DBP but lower HDL-C level (all P < 0.001). Men and women did not differ in level of FPG (P = 0.277).
Table 2

Characteristics of the study population in the Shantou region of southern China.

VariablesTotal (n = 4,580)Men (n = 3,062)Women (n = 1,518)
Age, years44.0 (36.0–57.0)43.0 (35.0–54.0)47.0 (37.0–60.0)*
WC, cm81.0 (74.0–87.0)82.8 (77.0–88.0)76.0 (69.0–83.0)*
TG, mmol/L1.27 (0.89–1.93)1.35 (0.96–2.09)1.08 (0.76–1.63)*
HDL-C, mmol/L1.31 (1.13–1.50)1.28 (1.11–1.46)1.36 (1.16–1.58)*
SBP, mmHg121.0 (110.0–134.4)122.0 (112.0–134.0)120.0 (110.0–135.0)*
DBP, mmHg80.0 (70.0–85.0)80.0 (72.0–86.0)77.0 (70.0–82.0)*
FPG, mmol/L5.07 (4.70–5.53)5.07 (4.70–5.51)5.08 (4.70–5.59)

Data are median (interquartile range [IQR]).

*P < 0.001 comparing women with men by the Mann–Whitney U test.

WC, waist circumference; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP/DBP, systolic/diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose.

Crude prevalence of MetS

Among all subjects, the crude prevalence (and number) with MetS was 16.2% (n = 774), 14.3% (n = 653), and 15.2% (n = 694) by MMRR, JCDCG, and IDF criteria, respectively (Fig. 1). Overall, 438 (9.6%) were identified as having MetS by all 3 definitions, and the number of subjects overlapping between the MMRR and JCDCG and MMRR and IDF criteria was 572 (12.5%) and 533 (11.6%), respectively (Fig. 1). The prevalence of MetS was higher for women than men by the MMRR (17.3% vs 15.7%; P = 0.190) and IDF criteria (20.6% vs 12.4%; P < 0.001) but higher for men than women by the JCDCG (12.5% vs 15.1%; P = 0.018). The proportion of MetS by the 3 criteria differed for men, women (both P < 0.001), and total subjects (P = 0.030). The prevalence of MetS was higher by the MMRR than JCDCG criteria for women (P < 0.001) and total subjects (P = 0.008) and by the IDF criteria for men (P < 0.001).
Figure 1

Overall crude prevalence and overlap of metabolic syndrome (MetS) by the JCDCG, MMRR, and IDF criteria among Shantou adults.

Standardized prevalence of MetS and its individual components

Overall, the age- and sex-standardized prevalence of MetS by the MMRR, JCDCG, and IDF diagnostic criteria was 13.5%, 11.6%, and 13.4%, respectively (P = 0.009) (Table 3). The standardized prevalence of MetS by the MMRR (P = 0.006) and IDF criteria (P = 0.010) was higher than by the JCDCG criteria, with no significant difference between the MMRR and IDF criteria (P = 0.903). The age-standardized prevalence of MetS was higher for men than women by the MMRR (14.2% vs 12.9%; P = 0.237) and JCDCG criteria (13.8% vs 9.4%; P < 0.001) but higher for women than men by the IDF criteria(15.7% vs 11.2%; P < 0.001).
Table 3

Standardized prevalence of MetS and its individual components by the MMRR, JCDCG, and IDF criteria.

 MMRR (%)JCDCG (%)IDF (%)
Men*Women*TotalMen*Women*TotalMen*Women*Total
Individual components of MetS
 Elevated WC21.528.7‡¶25.015.9§14.3§15.1§18.732.525.5
 Elevated TG30.419.825.231.118.524.931.118.524.9
 Reduced HDL-C19.2‡¶13.916.613.9‡§11.2§12.6§12.840.026.3
 Elevated SBP and/or DBP25.324.524.942.5‡§29.6§36.1§42.529.636.1
 Elevated FPG14.416.115.210.3§9.7§10.0§19.619.719.7
 MetS14.212.913.513.89.4§11.6§11.215.713.4
Number of metabolic abnormalities
 040.143.241.636.551.243.836.732.734.7
 128.728.428.531.526.829.232.540.136.2
 217.115.616.318.212.615.420.616.418.6
 39.68.38.99.76.68.28.68.38.5
 43.84.24.03.62.53.11.62.52.0
 50.80.40.60.50.30.4000

*Age-standardized prevalence rates.

†Age-standardized and sex-standardized prevalence rates. Standardization was conducted with the 2010 Chinese National Census Population by the direct method.

‡P < 0.001, significantly higher than for the other sex.

¶P < 0.001, the standardized proportions were significantly different among the MMRR, JCDCG, and IDF criteria.

§P < 0.001 comparing the JCDCG with the MMRR criteria. ÿP < 0.001 comparing the IDF with the MMRR criteria.

MetS, metabolic syndrome; MMRR, multivariate medical reference range; JCDCG, Chinese Joint Committee for Developing Chinese Guidelines; IDF, International Diabetes Federation; WC, waist circumference; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP/DBP, systolic/diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose.

Among men, women, and total subjects, the proportions of elevated WC (central obesity), reduced HDL-C level, elevated BP, and elevated FPG by the 3 criteria differed (all P < 0.001), with no significant difference in proportion of elevated TG level (all P > 0.05) (Table 3). The proportions of central obesity (increased WC), reduced HDL-C level, and elevated FPG was higher by the MMRR than JCDCG criteria but lower for elevated BP. Although the prevalence of MetS was approximately equal by the MMRR and IDF criteria, the proportions of the individual components of MetS by the 2 criteria differed (Table 3). The proportion of men with reduced HDL-C level was greater with the MMRR than the IDF criteria. According to thresholds for Shantou adults by the new criteria, elevated TG level (30.4%) and WC (28.7%) was the most prevalent component for men and women, respectively; the age-standardized prevalence of elevated TG and reduced HDL-C levels was higher for men than women, but the prevalence of central obesity (WC) was lower (all P < 0.001). With MMRR criteria, central obesity, elevated TG level, and elevated BP had a similar proportion among all subjects; 41.6% of all subjects had no individual components of MetS and 0.6% had all 5 metabolic abnormalities (Table 3). Overall, 36.1% of all subjects had elevated BP by both the JCDCG and IDF criteria. The prevalence of reduced HDL-C level by the IDF criteria among men and women was 12.8% and 40.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). Regardless of the definition used, the prevalence of MetS greatly increased with increasing age and peaked in the oldest group for men, women, and all subjects (all Ptrend < 0.001); the prevalence was higher for women than men among older adults (age ≥ 60) and lower among younger adults (age ≤ 50) (Fig. 2). By the MMRR criteria, the overall prevalence of MetS increased from 2.7% to 30.2% for subjects 18–29 years old to those > 70 years.
Figure 2

Age-specific percentage of MetS in men, women, and total subjects (sex-standardized) in the Shantou region of southern China by the MMRR (a), JCDCG (b), and IDF (c) criteria.

Agreement between the MMRR and JCDCG and MMRR and IDF criteria

With the JCDCG criteria as a reference, the observed agreement (with or without MetS), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of the MMRR criteria was 94.48%, 87.60%, 95.62%, 76.88%, and 97.89%, respectively (Table 4). As compared with the IDF criteria, the sensitivity of the new diagnostic criteria was 76.80% and specificity 94.57%. The levels of agreement between the MMRR and JCDCG criteria were “substantial” for women and all subjects (both  ≥ 0.75, P < 0.001) and “almost perfect” for men ( = 0.81, P < 0.001). The agreements between the MMRR and IDF criteria were “substantial” for men, women, and all subjects (all  ≥ 0.68, P < 0.001) (Table 4).
Table 4

Agreement between the MMRR and JCDCG, and MMRR and IDF criteria.

CriteriaMMRR
Observed agreement (%)Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)PPV (%)NPV (%)Kappa index (95% CI)Judgment for agreement
JCDCG
 Total94.4887.6095.6276.8897.890.79 (0.76, 0.81)*substantial
 Men94.9485.3196.6581.9597.360.81 (0.78, 0.84)*almost perfect
 Women93.5493.1693.6067.5698.960.75 (0.70, 0.80)*substantial
IDF
 Total91.8876.8094.5771.6495.800.69 (0.66, 0.72)*substantial
 Men92.3382.4193.7365.1597.400.68 (0.65, 0.72)*substantial
 Women90.9769.9796.4383.5992.520.71 (0.66, 0.75)*substantial

*P < 0.001 testing the null hypothesis that the extent of agreement is same as random ( = 0).

MMRR, multivariate medical reference range; JCDCG, Chinese Joint Committee for Developing Chinese Guidelines; IDF, International Diabetes Federation; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

Discussion

Considering ethnic and regional differences, the JCDCG or IDF criteria for diagnosing MetS may not be fully appropriate for the Shantou population. To simplify the clinical application of MetS criteria and improve its recognition, we performed a 95% multivariate reference model instead of the 95% multiple univariate reference intervals to establish a new diagnostic definition of MetS for Shantou adults. The 95% MMRR model based on the combinatorial indicatrixes method for three categorized indicatrixes is a valid statistical method for establishing diagnostic criteria for MetS and can be generalized to other geographic regions. We also compared the developed MMRR criteria with the JCDCG and IDF criteria and estimated the prevalence of MetS among adults in the Shantou region of southern China. The MetS and its components are strongly associated with increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes, with hazard ratios ranging from 4.41 to 7.475. A case–control study in California reported that a strong independent determinant of early-onset coronary artery disease is the presence of MetS without diabetes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.9) or with diabetes (aOR = 8.0)6. MetS is also a significant predictor of prevalent coronary heart disease (OR = 2.07), and the prevalence of coronary heart disease markedly increases with MetS27. In addition, a recent meta-analysis by Mottillo and coworkers28 showed MetS associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (relative risk [RR] = 2.35), myocardial infarction (RR = 1.99), stroke (RR = 2.27), cardiovascular mortality (RR = 2.40), and all-cause mortality (RR = 1.58); another meta-analysis of longitudinal studies10 demonstrated a similar result with an overall pooled RR of 1.78 for incident cardiovascular events and death with MetS. The identification of people with MetS may provide opportunities to intervene at an earlier stage of cardiovascular disease and to extend life in the adult population728. MetS is highly prevalent worldwide and affects approximately one-quarter of North Americans2930. In Asia, the adjusted prevalence of MetS by the IDF criteria was 25.8% (men 23.1%, women 28.2%) among Asian Indians31, 12.8% (17.0%) among Mauritian Indian men (women)21, and 13.8% (2.5%) among Japanese men (women)21, respectively; and 24.2% (men 24.7%, women 23.8%) among Malays by the NCEP-ATPIII criteria22. In China, the prevalence of MetS was 9.8% to 18.1% for men and 11.4% to 28.0% for women by the IDF or NCEP-ATPIII criteria1820323334. According to the MMRR criteria, the overall standardized prevalence of MetS among Shantou adults was 13.5% (men 14.2%, women 12.9%). Application of the prevalence rate to 2010 China census counts suggested that about 1.9 million Shantou natives have MetS. However, we should be cautious to directly compare our results with corresponding data from other research because the criteria used for determining MetS, the selection of the sample, and standardization and temporal differences affect prevalence estimation. In line with previous studies293132, we found that the prevalence of MetS greatly increased with increasing age regardless of the definition used. The prevalence of MetS was higher for women than men among older adults but lower among younger adults, which is consistent with other surveys2135. Although the agreement of the MMRR with JCDCG and IDF criteria was “substantial”, the proportions of individual MetS components by the MMRR criteria are not exactly the same as those by the JCDCG or IDF criteria. From the Venn diagram, subjects with MetS defined by the 3 criteria have some overlap but not much. In the present study, 438 (9.6%) participants were identified as having MetS by all 3 criteria and 940 (20.5%) by any of the 3 criteria. The MMRR criteria could detect some subjects with MetS who could not be confirmed as having MetS by the JCDCG or IDF criteria. As well, the cut-offs for MetS components differ slightly among the 3 criteria. For WC, the cut-off for central obesity was similar for men (89 or 90 cm) but slightly differed for women (80–85 cm). A 7.8-year follow-up study showed that the appropriate WC cut-offs for central obesity were 88 cm for men and 82 cm for women in the Chinese population36, and the cut-off points for WC (89 cm for men and 81 cm for women) by the MMRR criteria are closest to these results. Consistent evidence has demonstrated that Chinese men have a higher TG level than women1820213337, so the cut-off for abnormal TG level should differ by gender, which was considered by the population-based MMRR criteria but not the IDF or JCDCG criteria. Notably, among the 3 criteria, reduced HDL-C level in women was detected with the highest frequency by the IDF criteria, because the highest cut-off point for HDL-C level (1.29 mmol/L) was used for identifying reduced HDL-C level, and such a cut-off may not be appropriate for Chinese people2037. With the IDF criteria, the standardized prevalence of reduced HDL-C level among Shantou adults was surprisingly more than three-fold higher for women than me (40.0% vs 12.8%) n. Women with normal HDL-C levels will have a higher probability of having reduced HDL-C level by the IDF criteria, which increases false-positive observations. As compared with the JCDCG and IDF criteria, the MMRR criteria have higher cut-offs for BP and therefore produce a lower prevalence of elevated BP. The cut-off of FPG ≥ 6.1 mmol/L for hyperglycaemia by the JCDCG criteria is slightly high for Chinese people117, and we suggest decreasing the FPG cut-off to 5.6–5.8 mmol/L. Overall, the population-based MMRR criteria for diagnosing MetS are more appropriate for Shantou adults. Several limitations in our study should be acknowledged. First, our study had sampling selection bias toward males. To avoid such bias, the MMRR criteria were established separately for men and women. Moreover, we standardized by sex and age for evaluating the prevalence of MetS with different weights. Nevertheless, a larger sample with a gender balance should be investigated in the future. Second, a measure of insulin resistance was not included as a component of MetS in the MMRR criteria because of its complicated test and costly price. It might be considered one of the components for the MMRR criteria in the future with regular testing. MetS has become an important public health problem20. In the public health arena, the desirable way to reduce MetS is by lifestyle intervention, especially weight reduction, increased physical activity, and an anti-atherogenic diet3. Understanding the prevalence of MetS is critical for allocating health care resources and reducing the enormous economic burden of cardiovascular diseases to society2035. In conclusion, the newly established MMRR criteria of MetS agree substantially with the JCDCG and IDF criteria, but the recommended reference values and proportions for MetS components differ. The population-based MMRR criteria may be appropriate for diagnosing MetS in the Shantou population in China and the 95% MMRR model might be useful for generalization to other geographic regions. This study may help in better identifying people with MetS to reduce MetS-related disease.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Ding, Z. et al. Establishment and application of a new diagnostic definition of metabolic syndrome in the Shantou region of southern China. Sci. Rep. 6, 22210; doi: 10.1038/srep22210 (2016).
  36 in total

1.  The metabolic syndrome--a new worldwide definition.

Authors:  K George M M Alberti; Paul Zimmet; Jonathan Shaw
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Sep 24-30       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement.

Authors:  Scott M Grundy; James I Cleeman; Stephen R Daniels; Karen A Donato; Robert H Eckel; Barry A Franklin; David J Gordon; Ronald M Krauss; Peter J Savage; Sidney C Smith; John A Spertus; Fernando Costa
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Ethnic-specific criteria for the metabolic syndrome: evidence from China.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Scott M Grundy; Wei Wang; Sidney C Smith; Gloria Lena Vega; Zhaosu Wu; Zhechun Zeng; Wenhua Wang; Dong Zhao
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 4.  Metabolic syndrome and risk of incident cardiovascular events and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Apoor S Gami; Brandi J Witt; Daniel E Howard; Patricia J Erwin; Lisa A Gami; Virend K Somers; Victor M Montori
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome in Taiwan.

Authors:  Lee-Ching Hwang; Chyi-Huey Bai; Chien-Jen Chen
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and overweight among adults in China.

Authors:  Dongfeng Gu; Kristi Reynolds; Xigui Wu; Jing Chen; Xiufang Duan; Robert F Reynolds; Paul K Whelton; Jiang He
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Apr 16-22       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The metabolic syndrome and 11-year risk of incident cardiovascular disease in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study.

Authors:  Ann Marie McNeill; Wayne D Rosamond; Cynthia J Girman; Sherita Hill Golden; Maria I Schmidt; Honey E East; Christie M Ballantyne; Gerardo Heiss
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Metabolic syndrome and early-onset coronary artery disease: is the whole greater than its parts?

Authors:  Carlos Iribarren; Alan S Go; Gail Husson; Stephen Sidney; Joan M Fair; Thomas Quertermous; Mark A Hlatky; Stephen P Fortmann
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation.

Authors:  K G Alberti; P Z Zimmet
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.359

10.  Prevalence and determinants of metabolic syndrome among adults in a rural area of Northwest China.

Authors:  Yaling Zhao; Hong Yan; Ruihai Yang; Qiang Li; Shaonong Dang; Yuying Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sleep duration, daytime napping, markers of obstructive sleep apnea and stroke in a population of southern China.

Authors:  Ye Wen; Fu-Hua Pi; Pi Guo; Wen-Ya Dong; Yu-Qing Xie; Xiang-Yu Wang; Fang-Fang Xia; Shao-Jie Pang; Yan-Chun Wu; Yuan-Yuan Wang; Qing-Ying Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Comparison of the accuracy of three diagnostic criteria and estimating the prevalence of metabolic syndrome: A latent class analysis.

Authors:  Hossein Ebrahimi; Mohammad Hassan Emamian; Ahmad Khosravi; Hassan Hashemi; Akbar Fotouhi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 1.852

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.