| Literature DB >> 27698374 |
Ye Wen1, Fu-Hua Pi2, Pi Guo1, Wen-Ya Dong1, Yu-Qing Xie1, Xiang-Yu Wang1, Fang-Fang Xia1, Shao-Jie Pang1, Yan-Chun Wu3, Yuan-Yuan Wang3, Qing-Ying Zhang1.
Abstract
Sleep habits are associated with stroke in western populations, but this relation has been rarely investigated in China. Moreover, the differences among stroke subtypes remain unclear. This study aimed to explore the associations of total stroke, including ischemic and hemorrhagic type, with sleep habits of a population in southern China. We performed a case-control study in patients admitted to the hospital with first stroke and community control subjects. A total of 333 patients (n = 223, 67.0%, with ischemic stroke; n = 110, 23.0%, with hemorrhagic stroke) and 547 controls were enrolled in the study. Participants completed a structured questionnaire to identify sleep habits and other stroke risk factors. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) and multiple logistic regression were performed to identify risk factors of disease. Incidence of stroke, and its subtypes, was significantly associated with snorting/gasping, snoring, sleep duration, and daytime napping. Snorting/gasping was identified as an important risk factor in the Lasso logistic regression model (Lasso' β = 0.84), and the result was proven to be robust. This study showed the association between stroke and sleep habits in the southern Chinese population and might help in better detecting important sleep-related factors for stroke risk.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27698374 PMCID: PMC5048149 DOI: 10.1038/srep34689
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Baseline characteristics of participants.
| Characteristics | Cases n (%) ( | Controls n (%) ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 181 (54.4) | 315 (57.6) | 0.88 | 0.348 |
| Age (mean ± SD), year | 64.97 (13.17) | 63.93 (11.92) | 5.85 | |
| BMI | 12.37 | |||
| <18.5 | 20 (6.0) | 22 (4.0) | ||
| 18.5–25 | 244 (73.3) | 354 (64.7) | ||
| ≥25 | 69 (20.7) | 171 (31.3) | ||
| WHR | 3.18 | 0.204 | ||
| <0.68 | 142 (42.6) | 204 (37.3) | ||
| 0.68–0.90 | 93 (27.9) | 154 (28.2) | ||
| ≥0.90 | 98 (29.4) | 189 (34.6) | ||
| Hypertension | 154 (46.2) | 186 (34.0) | 13.09 | |
| Diabetes | 40 (12.0) | 63 (11.5) | 0.05 | 0.825 |
| Migraine | 57 (17.1) | 134 (24.5) | 6.63 | |
| Smoking | 9.13 | |||
| Formerly | 13 (3.9) | 48 (8.8) | ||
| Currently | 146 (43.8) | 206 (37.7) | ||
| Never | 174 (52.3) | 293 (53.6) | ||
| Alcohol | 9.22 | |||
| Formerly | 15 (4.5) | 36 (6.6) | ||
| Currently | 63 (18.9) | 65 (11.9) | ||
| Never | 255 (76.6) | 446 (81.5) | ||
| Physical activity | 18.89 | |||
| Mainly sedentary | 151 (45.3) | 246 (45.0) | ||
| Mild | 164 (49.2) | 222 (40.6) | ||
| Moderate/strenuous | 18 (5.4) | 79 (14.4) | ||
| Consumption of vegetables | 30 (9.0) | 83 (15.2) | 7.09 | |
| Consumption of fruits | 143 (42.9) | 164 (30.0) | 15.31 | |
| Education status | 30.09 | |||
| Illiteracy | 99 (29.7) | 125 (22.9) | ||
| Elementary education | 224 (67.3) | 345 (63.1) | ||
| Trade school/college/university | 10 (3.0) | 77 (14.1) | ||
| Income | 0.33 | 0.849 | ||
| Higher | 156 (46.8) | 264 (48.3) | ||
| Middle | 122 (36.6) | 190 (34.7) | ||
| Lower | 55 (16.5) | 93 (17.0) | ||
| Single or divorced | 26 (7.8) | 59 (10.8) | 2.10 | 0.147 |
| General stress | 3 (0.9) | 6 (1.1) | 0.08 | 0.779 |
| Depression | 6 (1.8) | 11 (2.0) | 0.05 | 0.827 |
N, number; P-value, significance of the difference between group means and frequency determined by t-test and chi-square test.
Figure 1Ten-fold cross-validation misclassification error rates with error bars of the Lasso logistic regression model across different values of the tuning parameter λ (log-scale).
The total number of covariates is 23. The minimum cross-validated error reached when the log of λ is −3.31. When the log of λ = −2.29, the error is within 1 standard error of the minimum cross-validated error.
Comparison of the estimates of sleep-related factors from the logistic regression model and the Lasso logistic regression model.
| Variable name | Case n (%) | Control n (%) | Lasso’s | Logistc’s | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sleep duration | |||||
| 7–<9 | 230 (69.1) | 424 (77.5) | |||
| <7 | 56 (16.8) | 87 (15.9) | −0.66 | 0.781 | |
| ≥9 | 47 (14.1) | 36 (6.6) | 0.69 | ||
| Daytime napping | 0.25 | ||||
| Yes | 132 (39.6) | 308 (56.3) | |||
| No | 201 (60.4) | 239 (43.7) | 0.55 | ||
| Snoring | 0.32 | ||||
| Never | 92 (27.6) | 326 (59.6) | |||
| Occasional | 192 (57.7) | 150 (27.4) | 0.54 | ||
| Frequent | 49 (14.7) | 71 (13.0) | 0.74 | ||
| Snorting/gasping | 1.19 | ||||
| No | 152 (45.6) | 458 (83.7) | |||
| Yes | 181 (54.4) | 89 (16.3) | 1.43 | ||
Figure 2The path of the parameter estimated over a grid of values for λ.
The numbers of selected covariates were eight and one for the two tuning parameter λ.
Figure 3The Lasso method with λ = −3.31 (log-scale) on the simulated data.
In each scenario, the percentage of the bootstrapped data is on the left, whereas the percentage of the permuted data is on the right. The red bar represents the covariate of daytime napping, snoring, snorting/gasping, BMI, hypertension, consumption of vegetables, consumption of fruits, and education status in turn.
Figure 4The Lasso method with λ = −2.29 (log-scale) on the simulated data.
In each scenario, the percentage of the bootstrapped data is on the left, whereas the percentage of the permuted data is on the right. The red bar represents the covariate of snorting/gasping.
Associations between sleep habits (sleep duration, daytime napping, and snorting/gasping) and stroke by subgroups, with different levels of adjustments.
| Sleep habits | Sleep duration | Daytime napping | Snorting/gasping | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7–<9 h | <7 h | ≥9 h | Yes | No | No | Yes | |
| Total stroke | |||||||
| Model A | 1.00 | 0.94 (0.62 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Model B | 1.00 | 0.89 (0.57 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Model C | 1.00 | 0.92 (0.59 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Model D | 1.00 | 0.94 (0.59 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Ischemic stroke | |||||||
| Model A | 1.00 | 0.89 (0.55 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Model B | 1.00 | 0.85 (0.51 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Model C | 1.00 | 0.87 (0.52 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Model D | 1.00 | 0.87 (0.51 | 1.00 | 1.46 (1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Hemorrhagic stroke | |||||||
| Model A | 1.00 | 0.95 (0.52 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Model B | 1.00 | 0.81 (0.42 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Model C | 1.00 | 0.82 (0.42 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Model D | 1.00 | 0.97 (0.47 | 2.25 (0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
Model A adjusted for age, sex, sleep duration, daytime napping, snoring, and snorting/gasping.
Model B adjusted for the variables in model A plus education, smoking, alcohol, vegetables, fruits consumption status, and history of diabetes.
Model C adjusted for the variables in model B plus history of hypertension and body-mass index.
Model D adjusted for the variables in model C plus physical activity, sleep quality, and psychosocial factors.
Each model adjusted for the other covariates, except for itself.
Associations between snoring and stroke by subgroups.
| Sleep habits | Snoring | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Never | Occasional | Frequent | |
| Total stroke | 1.00 | ||
| Ischemic stroke | 1.00 | ||
| Hemorrhagic stroke | 1.00 | 1.27 (0.58 | 2.24 (0.97 |
| Male | 1.00 | ||
| Female | 1.00 | 1.69 (0.72 | |
*Adjusted for covariates in model D.
#Adjusted for covariates in model D except for age.