Literature DB >> 26900500

THE EFFECT OF STEP RATE MANIPULATION ON FOOT STRIKE PATTERN OF LONG DISTANCE RUNNERS.

Darrell J Allen1, Hollie Heisler1, Jennifer Mooney1, Richard Kring1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
BACKGROUND: Running gait retraining to change foot strike pattern in runners from a heel strike pattern to a non heel- strike pattern has been shown to reduce impact forces and may help to reduce running related injuries. Step rate manipulation above preferred is known to help decrease step length, foot inclination angle, and vertical mass excursion, but has not yet been evaluated as a method to change foot strike pattern. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of step rate manipulation on foot strike pattern in shod recreational runners who run with a heel strike pattern. A secondary purpose was to describe the effect of step rate manipulation at specific percentages above preferred on foot inclination angle at initial contact.
METHODS: Forty volunteer runners, who were self-reported heel strikers and had a weekly running mileage of at least 10 miles, were recruited. Runners were confirmed to be heel strikers during the warm up period on the treadmill. The subject's step rate was determined at their preferred running pace. A metronome was used to increase step rate above the preferred step rate by 5%, 10% and 15%. 2D video motion analysis was utilized to determine foot strike pattern and to measure foot inclination angle at initial contact for each step rate condition.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant change in foot strike pattern from a heel strike pattern to a mid-foot or forefoot strike pattern at both 10% and 15% step rates above preferred. Seven of the 40 subjects (17.5%) changed from a heel- strike pattern to a non- heel strike pattern at +10% and 12 of the 40 subjects (30%) changed to a non-heel strike pattern at +15%. Mean foot inclination angle at initial contact showed a statistically significant change (reduction) as step rate increased.
CONCLUSION: Step rate manipulation of 10% or greater may be enough to change foot strike pattern from a heel strike to a mid-foot or forefoot strike pattern in a small percentage of recreational runners who run in traditional running shoes. If changing the foot strike pattern is the main goal, other gait re-training methods may be needed to make a change from a heel strike to a non-heel strike pattern. Step rate manipulation shows a progressive reduction of foot inclination angle at 5%, 10%, and 15% above preferred step rate which reduces the severity of the heel strike at initial contact. Step rate manipulation of at least +10% above preferred may be an effective running gait retraining method for clinicians to decrease the severity of heel strike and possibly assist a runner to change to a non-heel strike pattern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Keywords:  Foot strike pattern; running gait retraining; step rate manipulation

Year:  2016        PMID: 26900500      PMCID: PMC4739048     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  34 in total

1.  Ability of sagittal kinematic variables to estimate ground reaction forces and joint kinetics in running.

Authors:  Christa M Wille; Rachel L Lenhart; Sijian Wang; Darryl G Thelen; Bryan C Heiderscheit
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 2.  Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review.

Authors:  R N van Gent; D Siem; M van Middelkoop; A G van Os; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra; B W Koes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Measurement frequency influences the rating of perceived exertion during sub-maximal treadmill running.

Authors:  Jo Corbett; Steve Vance; Mitch Lomax; Martin J Barwood
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  12 weeks of simulated barefoot running changes foot-strike patterns in female runners.

Authors:  C McCarthy; N Fleming; B Donne; B Blanksby
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.118

5.  Reliability of video-based identification of footstrike pattern and video time frame at initial contact in recreational runners.

Authors:  C Damsted; L H Larsen; R O Nielsen
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Changes in muscle activation patterns when running step rate is increased.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Chumanov; Christa M Wille; Max P Michalski; Bryan C Heiderscheit
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Step frequency and lower extremity loading during running.

Authors:  H Hobara; T Sato; M Sakaguchi; T Sato; K Nakazawa
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.118

8.  Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Self-Reported Foot-Strike Patterns Among Runners in Traditional and Minimalist Shoes.

Authors:  Donald L Goss; Michael Lewek; Bing Yu; William B Ware; Deydre S Teyhen; Michael T Gross
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Influence of stride frequency and length on running mechanics: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amy G Schubert; Jenny Kempf; Bryan C Heiderscheit
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.843

10.  Variation in foot strike patterns during running among habitually barefoot populations.

Authors:  Kevin G Hatala; Heather L Dingwall; Roshna E Wunderlich; Brian G Richmond
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effects of 12-week cadence retraining on impact peak, load rates and lower extremity biomechanics in running.

Authors:  Junqing Wang; Zhen Luo; Boyi Dai; Weijie Fu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  THE EFFECT OF AN ANTI-GRAVITY TREADMILL ON RUNNING CADENCE.

Authors:  Josie Stockland; M Russell Giveans; Peter Ames
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-12

3.  SPATIOTEMPORAL COMPARISON OF OVERGROUND AND TREADMILL RUNNING WITH PRESSURE SENSOR INSOLES IN DIVISION I COLLEGIATE RUNNERS.

Authors:  Hanz Tao; Lindsay Joyce; Bethany Kozak; Jacob Luiken; Nathan Wendt
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-09

4.  Transition to forefoot strike reduces load rates more effectively than altered cadence.

Authors:  Erin E Futrell; K Douglas Gross; Darcy Reisman; David R Mullineaux; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 7.179

5.  Will the Foot Strike Pattern Change at Different Running Speeds with or without Wearing Shoes?

Authors:  Ying-Jen Lai; Willy Chou; I-Hua Chu; Yu-Lin Wang; Yi-Jing Lin; Shihfan Jack Tu; Lan-Yuen Guo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Non-South East Asians have a better running economy and different anthropometrics and biomechanics than South East Asians.

Authors:  Aurélien Patoz; Thibault Lussiana; Bastiaan Breine; Cyrille Gindre; Laurent Mourot; Kim Hébert-Losier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  The Coupling of Stride Length and Foot Strike in Running.

Authors:  Missy Thompson; Kristine Hoffman; Lindsay Blythe; Rachel Hasler; Megan Longtain
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-04-12

8.  What is the Effect of Changing Running Step Rate on Injury, Performance and Biomechanics? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura M Anderson; Joel F Martin; Christian J Barton; Daniel R Bonanno
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-09-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.