Literature DB >> 31803518

THE EFFECT OF AN ANTI-GRAVITY TREADMILL ON RUNNING CADENCE.

Josie Stockland1, M Russell Giveans1, Peter Ames1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Running cadence, or step rate, is often measured in running gait analysis and manipulated in gait retraining. A lower body positive pressure treadmill, or anti-gravity treadmill, allows users to walk/run in a reduced gravity environment.
PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to determine how natural running cadence is affected by running on an anti-gravity treadmill compared to a standard treadmill in a healthy, active population. The secondary purpose was to determine if natural and increased cadence is affected by amount of body weight support. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study (convenience sample).
METHODS: Thirty participants were recruited to run on an anti-gravity treadmill (AlterG Anti-Gravity TreadmillTM M320) at their pre-determined, self-selected, comfortable treadmill speed. Cadence was recorded at nine randomized bodyweight conditions, ranging from 100% of body weight to 20% of body weight, in 10% increments. An additional nine participants were recruited to try to replicate their natural, standard treadmill cadence, as well as increase it by 5% and 10%, while on an anti-gravity treadmill with the same randomized body weight conditions.
RESULTS: Thirty participants, 19 females and 11 males, mean age 27.3 years (range, 22-45), completed Part 1 of the study protocol, while nine additional participants (2 females and 7 males) with a mean age of 29.6 years old (range, 25-40 years) completed Part 2 of the protocol. There was a significant effect of natural running cadence on the anti-gravity treadmill at reduced body weight percentages (p<.01). Post-hoc t-tests revealed that every 10% bodyweight interval was significantly lower than the previous 10% interval (p<.01) on the anti-gravity treadmill, with cadence decreases ranging from 1.5%-3.5% between intervals. Seven of the nine (77.8%) participants in Part 2 were able to replicate and increase their cadence at all body weight levels on the anti-gravity treadmill.
CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing bodyweight level on an anti-gravity treadmill yields a significant and linear decrease in running cadence when performed at a self-selected, moderate intensity pace. Further, the vast majority of participants were able to successfully replicate and increase cadence at all levels of bodyweight percentage.
© 2019 by the Sports Physical Therapy Section.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-gravity treadmill; Cadence; Running

Year:  2019        PMID: 31803518      PMCID: PMC6878870     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  20 in total

Review 1.  Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review.

Authors:  R N van Gent; D Siem; M van Middelkoop; A G van Os; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra; B W Koes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Running on a lower-body positive pressure treadmill: VO2max, respiratory response, and vertical ground reaction force.

Authors:  Peter C Raffalt; Line Hovgaard-Hansen; Bente Rona Jensen
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Prospective comparison of running injuries between shod and barefoot runners.

Authors:  Allison R Altman; Irene S Davis
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Influence of the Heel-to-Toe Drop of Standard Cushioned Running Shoes on Injury Risk in Leisure-Time Runners: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 6-Month Follow-up.

Authors:  Laurent Malisoux; Nicolas Chambon; Axel Urhausen; Daniel Theisen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  THE EFFECT OF STEP RATE MANIPULATION ON FOOT STRIKE PATTERN OF LONG DISTANCE RUNNERS.

Authors:  Darrell J Allen; Hollie Heisler; Jennifer Mooney; Richard Kring
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-02

6.  The Proportion of Lower Limb Running Injuries by Gender, Anatomical Location and Specific Pathology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Peter Francis; Chris Whatman; Kelly Sheerin; Patria Hume; Mark I Johnson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Risk factors for injuries and other health problems sustained in a marathon.

Authors:  P Satterthwaite; R Norton; P Larmer; E Robinson
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  The 5- or 10-km Marikenloop Run: A Prospective Study of the Etiology of Running-Related Injuries in Women.

Authors:  Maarten P van der Worp; Anton de Wijer; Robert van Cingel; André L M Verbeek; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; J Bart Staal
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Profile of injures prevalence in athletes who participated in SESC Triathlon Caiobá-2011.

Authors:  Izabela Pichinin Bertola; Renato Pineda Sartori; Daniela Gallon Corrêa; Talita Gianello Gnoato Zotz; Anna Raquel Silveira Gomes
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.513

10.  Health and Economic Burden of Running-Related Injuries in Dutch Trailrunners: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Luiz Carlos Hespanhol Junior; Willem van Mechelen; Evert Verhagen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.136

View more
  1 in total

1.  Role of Antigravity Training in Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Running Injuries.

Authors:  Heather K Vincent; Aimee Madsen; Kevin R Vincent
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.