Mohsen Khosroabadi1, Bagher Farhood2, Mahdi Ghorbani3, Nima Hamzian3, Homa Rezaei Moghaddam1, David Davenport4. 1. Faculty of Medicine, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran. 2. Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 3. Medical Physics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. 4. Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the effect of the compositions of various soft tissues and tissue-equivalent materials on dose distribution in neutron brachytherapy/neutron capture therapy. BACKGROUND: Neutron brachytherapy and neutron capture therapy are two common radiotherapy modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dose distributions were calculated around a low dose rate (252)Cf source located in a spherical phantom with radius of 20.0 cm using the MCNPX code for seven soft tissues and three tissue-equivalent materials. Relative total dose rate, relative neutron dose rate, total dose rate, and neutron dose rate were calculated for each material. These values were determined at various radial distances ranging from 0.3 to 15.0 cm from the source. RESULTS: Among the soft tissues and tissue-equivalent materials studied, adipose tissue and plexiglass demonstrated the greatest differences for total dose rate compared to 9-component soft tissue. The difference in dose rate with respect to 9-component soft tissue varied with compositions of the materials and the radial distance from the source. Furthermore, the total dose rate in water was different from that in 9-component soft tissue. CONCLUSION: Taking the same composition for various soft tissues and tissue-equivalent media can lead to error in treatment planning in neutron brachytherapy/neutron capture therapy. Since the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) recommends that the total dosimetric uncertainty in dose delivery in radiotherapy should be within ±5%, the compositions of various soft tissues and tissue-equivalent materials should be considered in dose calculation and treatment planning in neutron brachytherapy/neutron capture therapy.
AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the effect of the compositions of various soft tissues and tissue-equivalent materials on dose distribution in neutron brachytherapy/neutron capture therapy. BACKGROUND: Neutron brachytherapy and neutron capture therapy are two common radiotherapy modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dose distributions were calculated around a low dose rate (252)Cf source located in a spherical phantom with radius of 20.0 cm using the MCNPX code for seven soft tissues and three tissue-equivalent materials. Relative total dose rate, relative neutron dose rate, total dose rate, and neutron dose rate were calculated for each material. These values were determined at various radial distances ranging from 0.3 to 15.0 cm from the source. RESULTS: Among the soft tissues and tissue-equivalent materials studied, adipose tissue and plexiglass demonstrated the greatest differences for total dose rate compared to 9-component soft tissue. The difference in dose rate with respect to 9-component soft tissue varied with compositions of the materials and the radial distance from the source. Furthermore, the total dose rate in water was different from that in 9-component soft tissue. CONCLUSION: Taking the same composition for various soft tissues and tissue-equivalent media can lead to error in treatment planning in neutron brachytherapy/neutron capture therapy. Since the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) recommends that the total dosimetric uncertainty in dose delivery in radiotherapy should be within ±5%, the compositions of various soft tissues and tissue-equivalent materials should be considered in dose calculation and treatment planning in neutron brachytherapy/neutron capture therapy.
Authors: Asma Sheykhoo; Sara Abdollahi; Mohammad Hadi Hadizadeh Yazdi; Mahdi Ghorbani; Mohammad Mohammadi Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2016-10-17