Literature DB >> 26508568

Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.

Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, George A Diaz, Randi E Zinberg, Kadija Ferryman, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, Eric E Schadt.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID： 26508568      PMCID： PMC4795219          DOI： 10.1038/ejhg.2015.179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN： 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

1.  My Identical Twin Sequenced our Genome.

Authors:  Samantha L P Schilit; Arielle Schilit Nitenson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Much ado about nothing: A qualitative study of the experiences of an average-risk population receiving results of exome sequencing.

Authors:  Shannon Rego; Orit Dagan-Rosenfeld; Stephanie A Bivona; Michael P Snyder; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Choices for return of primary and secondary genomic research results of 790 members of families with Mendelian disease.

Authors:  Katie Fiallos; Carolyn Applegate; Debra Jh Mathews; Juli Bollinger; Amanda L Bergner; Cynthia A James
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Impact of Genomic Counseling on Informed Decision-Making among ostensibly Healthy Individuals Seeking Personal Genome Sequencing: the HealthSeq Project.

Authors:  Sabrina A Suckiel; Michael D Linderman; Saskia C Sanderson; George A Diaz; Melissa Wasserstein; Andrew Kasarskis; Eric E Schadt; Randi E Zinberg
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Great expectations: patient perspectives and anticipated utility of non-diagnostic genomic-sequencing results.

Authors:  Robyn Hylind; Maureen Smith; Laura Rasmussen-Torvik; Sharon Aufox
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-06-27

6.  Broad Consent for Research on Biospecimens: The Views of Actual Donors at Four U.S. Medical Centers.

Authors:  Teddy D Warner; Carol J Weil; Christopher Andry; Howard B Degenholtz; Lisa Parker; Latarsha J Carithers; Michelle Feige; David Wendler; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Determining the effects and challenges of incorporating genetic testing into primary care management of hypertensive patients with African ancestry.

Authors:  C R Horowitz; N S Abul-Husn; S Ellis; M A Ramos; R Negron; M Suprun; R E Zinberg; T Sabin; D Hauser; N Calman; E Bagiella; E P Bottinger
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  "I would like to discuss it further with an expert": a focus group study of Finnish adults' perspectives on genetic secondary findings.

Authors:  M Vornanen; K Aktan-Collan; N Hallowell; H Konttinen; H Kääriäinen; A Haukkala
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2018-01-16

9.  Comprehension and personal value of negative non-diagnostic genetic panel testing.

Authors:  Christin Hoell; Sharon Aufox; Nora Nashawaty; Melanie F Myers; Maureen E Smith
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 10.  Assessing the Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Genomic Sequencing.

Authors:  Kurt D Christensen; Dmitry Dukhovny; Uwe Siebert; Robert C Green
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2015-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.