Literature DB >> 26896724

The time course of conflict on the Cognitive Reflection Test.

Eoin Travers1, Jonathan J Rolison2, Aidan Feeney2.   

Abstract

Reasoning that is deliberative and reflective often requires the inhibition of intuitive responses. The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) is designed to assess people's ability to suppress incorrect heuristic responses in favour of deliberation. Correct responding on the CRT predicts performance on a range of tasks in which intuitive processes lead to incorrect responses, suggesting indirectly that CRT performance is related to cognitive control. Yet little is known about the cognitive processes underlying performance on the CRT. In the current research, we employed a novel mouse tracking methodology to capture the time-course of reasoning on the CRT. Analysis of mouse cursor trajectories revealed that participants were initially drawn towards the incorrect (i.e., intuitive) option even when the correct (deliberative) option was ultimately chosen. Conversely, participants were not attracted to the correct option when they ultimately chose the incorrect intuitive one. We conclude that intuitive processes are activated automatically on the CRT and must be inhibited in order to respond correctly. When participants responded intuitively, there was no evidence that deliberative reasoning had become engaged.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive Reflection Test; Conflict; Dual processes; Heuristic; Mouse tracking; Reasoning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26896724     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  16 in total

1.  Cognitive reflection and antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections.

Authors:  Dwan B Pineros; Jason N Doctor; Mark W Friedberg; Daniella Meeker; Jeffrey A Linder
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  The Bat-and-Ball Problem: Stronger evidence in support of a conscious error process.

Authors:  Jerome D Hoover; Alice F Healy
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2019-03-14

3.  Think slow, then fast: Does repeated deliberation boost correct intuitive responding?

Authors:  Matthieu Raoelison; Marine Keime; Wim De Neys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-02-11

4.  Dunning-Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence.

Authors:  Gordon Pennycook; Robert M Ross; Derek J Koehler; Jonathan A Fugelsang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

5.  The Impact of Choice Architecture on Sepsis Fluid Resuscitation Decisions: An Exploratory Survey-Based Study.

Authors:  Jason N Mansoori; Brendan J Clark; Edward P Havranek; Ivor S Douglas
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2022-05-14

6.  Design factors in mouse-tracking: What makes a difference?

Authors:  Pascal J Kieslich; Martin Schoemann; Tobias Grage; Johanna Hepp; Stefan Scherbaum
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-02

7.  Eye tracking and the cognitive reflection test: Evidence for intuitive correct responding and uncertain heuristic responding.

Authors:  Zoe A Purcell; Stephanie Howarth; Colin A Wastell; Andrew J Roberts; Naomi Sweller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-08-13

8.  The effect of methylphenidate and mixed amphetamine salts on cognitive reflection: a field study.

Authors:  Eldad Yechiam; Dana Zeif
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Response: Commentary: Seeing the conflict: an attentional account of reasoning errors.

Authors:  André Mata; Mário B Ferreira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-26

Review 10.  A Review of Consequences of Poverty on Economic Decision-Making: A Hypothesized Model of a Cognitive Mechanism.

Authors:  Matúš Adamkovič; Marcel Martončik
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.