Literature DB >> 34389912

Eye tracking and the cognitive reflection test: Evidence for intuitive correct responding and uncertain heuristic responding.

Zoe A Purcell1, Stephanie Howarth2, Colin A Wastell3, Andrew J Roberts2, Naomi Sweller3.   

Abstract

The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) has been used in thousands of studies across several fields of behavioural research. The CRT has fascinated scholars because it commonly elicits incorrect answers despite most respondents possessing the necessary knowledge to reach the correct answer. Traditional interpretations of CRT performance asserted that correct responding was the result of corrective reasoning involving the inhibition and correction of the incorrect response and incorrect responding was an indication of miserly thinking without feelings of uncertainty. Recently, however, these assertions have been challenged. We extend this work by employing novel eye-tracking techniques to examine whether people use corrective cognitive pathways to reach correct solutions, and whether heuristic respondents demonstrate gaze-based signs of uncertainty. Eye movements suggest that correct responding on the CRT is the result of intuitive not corrective cognitive pathways, and that heuristic respondents show signs of gaze-based uncertainty.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive Reflection Test; Conflict; Dual process; Eye tracking; Uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34389912     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-021-01224-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing.

Authors:  Andreas Glöckner; Tilmann Betsch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate.

Authors:  Jonathan St B T Evans; Keith E Stanovich
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-05

3.  Second-guess: Testing the specificity of error detection in the bat-and-ball problem.

Authors:  Bence Bago; Matthieu Raoelison; Wim De Neys
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2019-01-18

4.  Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: cognitive misers are no happy fools.

Authors:  Wim De Neys; Sandrine Rossi; Olivier Houdé
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

5.  Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory.

Authors:  Bence Bago; Wim De Neys
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-11-04

6.  Bias and Conflict: A Case for Logical Intuitions.

Authors:  Wim De Neys
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-01-05

7.  Effects of belief and logic on syllogistic reasoning: Eye-movement evidence for selective processing models.

Authors:  Linden J Ball; Peter Phillips; Caroline N Wade; Jeremy D Quayle
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2006

8.  Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking.

Authors:  Wim De Neys; Tamara Glumicic
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-12

9.  Biased but in doubt: conflict and decision confidence.

Authors:  Wim De Neys; Sofie Cromheeke; Magda Osman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An Eye-Tracking Study of Statistical Reasoning With Tree Diagrams and 2 × 2 Tables.

Authors:  Georg Bruckmaier; Karin Binder; Stefan Krauss; Han-Min Kufner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.