Eldad Yechiam1, Dana Zeif2. 1. Max Wertheimer Minerva Center for Cognitive Studies, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 3200003, Haifa, Israel. yeldad@ie.technion.ac.il. 2. Max Wertheimer Minerva Center for Cognitive Studies, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 3200003, Haifa, Israel.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Methylphenidate (MPH) and mixed D,L-amphetamine salts (MASs; Adderall) were previously found to have unreliable effects on judgment and decision processes. OBJECTIVE: We predicted that MPH and MASs have a specific effect of reducing heuristic responses, which should lead to increased performance on the cognitive reflection test (CRT). The CRT is considered to be a testbed for heuristic versus deliberative response modes. METHODS: We recruited a sample of 15,361 individuals using the Prolific Academic crowdsourcing platform. From this initial pool, our final sample consisted of 294 participants (125 MPH users and 169 MASs users) who conformed to the study criteria and completed the experimental tasks. Tasks were performed on days where participants were either medicated or not, allowing to assess the effect of medication status. RESULTS: There was a strong positive effect of taking MPH on CRT scores (Cohen's d = 0.40) which was not qualified by frequency of MPH usage, ADHD symptoms, and demographic factors. There was also a somewhat weaker effect for MASs (Cohen's d = 0.07). No effects of MPH and MASs were recorded for risk-taking and numeracy. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that MPH enhances decision-making in tasks where heuristic responses typically bias it.
RATIONALE: Methylphenidate (MPH) and mixed D,L-amphetamine salts (MASs; Adderall) were previously found to have unreliable effects on judgment and decision processes. OBJECTIVE: We predicted that MPH and MASs have a specific effect of reducing heuristic responses, which should lead to increased performance on the cognitive reflection test (CRT). The CRT is considered to be a testbed for heuristic versus deliberative response modes. METHODS: We recruited a sample of 15,361 individuals using the Prolific Academic crowdsourcing platform. From this initial pool, our final sample consisted of 294 participants (125 MPH users and 169 MASs users) who conformed to the study criteria and completed the experimental tasks. Tasks were performed on days where participants were either medicated or not, allowing to assess the effect of medication status. RESULTS: There was a strong positive effect of taking MPH on CRT scores (Cohen's d = 0.40) which was not qualified by frequency of MPH usage, ADHD symptoms, and demographic factors. There was also a somewhat weaker effect for MASs (Cohen's d = 0.07). No effects of MPH and MASs were recorded for risk-taking and numeracy. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that MPH enhances decision-making in tasks where heuristic responses typically bias it.
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Lenard Adler; Minnie Ames; Olga Demler; Steve Faraone; Eva Hiripi; Mary J Howes; Robert Jin; Kristina Secnik; Thomas Spencer; T Bedirhan Ustun; Ellen E Walters Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 7.723