Literature DB >> 26894639

Costs and Complications of Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nailing of OTA 31-A2 Proximal Femur Fractures in U.S. Veterans.

Henry Krigbaum1, Steven Takemoto, Hubert T Kim, Alfred C Kuo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In fractures without subtrochanteric extension, the indications for the use of short versus long cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) for intertrochanteric femur fractures are unclear. We hypothesized that long nails would be associated with higher costs and similar complication rates.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study.
SETTING: United States Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving CMNs for OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures from 2001 to 2010.
INTERVENTIONS: Short versus long cephalomedullary nailing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Costs, perioperative complications, readmissions, surgical failures, and mortality.
RESULTS: We identified 262 patients with OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures (125 treated with short CMNs and 137 treated with long CMNs). The 2 cohorts had similar demographic and medical characteristics. There were no significant differences in perioperative complications, readmissions within 30 days, surgical failures within one year, or death within 30 days or one year. The average cost of hospitalization was significantly higher for the cohort treated with long nails (greater than $7000 in actual costs, and greater than $3000 when statistically adjusted for differences in postoperative lengths of stay). Multivariable analyses showed no significant differences in the rates of development of at least one complication, readmission, or death.
CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with similar characteristics and fracture patterns, the use of long CMNs was associated with similar rates of complications, readmission, and reoperations, but significantly higher costs than with the use of short nails. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26894639     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  14 in total

1.  Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (AO 31-A1 and AO 31-A2): a systematic review.

Authors:  Pernille Bovbjerg; Lonnie Froberg; Hagen Schmal
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-18

2.  Cephalomedullary nailing versus sliding hip screws for Intertrochanteric and basicervical hip fractures: a propensity-matched study of short-term outcomes in over 17,000 patients.

Authors:  Jared A Warren; Kavin Sundaram; Robert Hampton; John McLaughlin; Brendan Patterson; Carlos A Higuera; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-05

3.  Osteoarthritis is associated with increased failure of proximal femoral fracture fixation.

Authors:  Charles A Gallagher; Christopher W Jones; Lara Kimmel; Christopher Wylde; Anthony Osbrough; Max Bulsara; Kathryn Hird; Piers Yates
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  How are peri-implant fractures below short versus long cephalomedullary nails different?

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Brett P Salazar; Jamie Furness; James E Feng; Malcolm R DeBaun; Sean T Campbell; Justin F Lucas; William W Cross; Philipp Leucht; Kevin D Grant; Michael J Gardner; Julius A Bishop
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-09-09

5.  Fractures after cephalomedullary nailing of the femur : Systematization of surgical fixation based on the analysis of a single-center retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Inca Vilar-Sastre; Sebastián Corró; Jordi Tomàs-Hernández; Jordi Teixidor-Serra; Jordi Selga-Marsà; Carlos-Alberto Piedra-Calle; Vicente Molero-García; Yaiza García-Sánchez; José-Vicente Andrés-Peiró
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 3.479

6.  Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures with Long versus Short Cephalomedullary Nails.

Authors:  Cameron Sadeghi; Heather A Prentice; Kanu M Okike; Elizabeth W Paxton
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2020

7.  Treatment of basicervical femoral neck fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation.

Authors:  Jialiang Guo; Weichong Dong; Lin Jin; Yingchao Yin; Ruipeng Zhang; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-07-21       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Clinical Outcomes of Intermediate-Length Cephalomedullary Nails for Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Repair in Older Adults.

Authors:  Paul A Enns; Sue M Nyberg; Gina M Berg; Morgan A Galliart; Brent D Sarauer; Andrew A Scheer; Bradley R Dart; Chad M Corrigan
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2020-05-21

9.  Implant-Related Complications and Mortality After Use of Short or Long Gamma Nail for Intertrochanteric and Subtrochanteric Fractures: A Prospective Study with Minimum 13-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Nolan S Horner; Kristian Samuelsson; Janos Solyom; Kristian Bjørgul; Olufemi R Ayeni; Bengt Östman
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2017-09-25

10.  Comparison of reamed long and short intramedullary nail constructs in unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures: A biomechanical study.

Authors:  Laura E Blum; Michael A Yee; Cyril Mauffrey; James A Goulet; Aaron M Perdue; Mark E Hake
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2020-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.