Literature DB >> 35779111

Fractures after cephalomedullary nailing of the femur : Systematization of surgical fixation based on the analysis of a single-center retrospective cohort.

Inca Vilar-Sastre1, Sebastián Corró2, Jordi Tomàs-Hernández1,3, Jordi Teixidor-Serra1,3, Jordi Selga-Marsà1,3, Carlos-Alberto Piedra-Calle1,3, Vicente Molero-García1,3, Yaiza García-Sánchez3, José-Vicente Andrés-Peiró4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSES: Femoral implant related fractures (IRF) are a growing pathology in an increasingly elderly and frail population. A series of IRF after cephalomedullary nail (CMN) fixation of a femoral fracture is analyzed and an algorithm described to guide the management of such fractures.
METHODS: All eligible patients operated on for IRF fixation after CMN were reviewed regarding their demographics, comorbidities, injury pattern, and treatment. Primary outcomes were mortality and local complications. Secondary outcomes were time to consolidation, time to weight-bearing initiation, length of hospitalization, and discharge destination.
RESULTS: The incidence of IRF requiring fixation was 1.3% after 3401 CMN implantation procedures. Elderly women with comorbidities and plate fixation predominated. One-year mortality was 18.6%, being higher for patients presenting with infection and those unable to walk at the end of follow-up. Local complications occurred in 25.6%. Median time to weight-bearing was 9.1 weeks, but longer for patients with plate fixation or complications. Patients presenting with an infection and those discharged to nursing facilities had more comorbidity.
CONCLUSIONS: Following an algorithm presented here, patients were treated either with nail exchange or lateral locking plate fixation, permitting straightforward evaluations and acceptable results in a very high-risk population.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cephalomedullary nail; Implant-related fracture; Lateral plate; Nail exchange; Non-prosthetic peri-implant fracture; Treatment algorithm

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35779111     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05490-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.479


  28 in total

1.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

2.  Proposal for the classification of peri-implant femoral fractures: Retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Miquel Videla-Cés; José-Miguel Sales-Pérez; Rubén Sánchez-Navés; Eudald Romero-Pijoan; Sebastián Videla
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 3.  The societal burden of osteoporosis.

Authors:  David J Becker; Meredith L Kilgore; Michael A Morrisey
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures: classification, management and outcomes.

Authors:  Lester W M Chan; Antony W Gardner; Merng Koon Wong; Kenon Chua; Ernest B K Kwek
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Previous Implant Fractures: A New Descriptive Classification System.

Authors:  Kenneth A Egol; Kurtis D Carlock; Erin A Kelly; Abhijit Seetharam; Brian H Mullis; Andrew J Marcantonio; Kasey J Bramlett; Corbyn M Nchako; J Tracy Watson; Lisa K Cannada; Sanjit R Konda
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database.

Authors:  Jeffrey O Anglen; James N Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Outcome after surgery for the treatment of hip fracture in the extremely elderly.

Authors:  G Holt; R Smith; K Duncan; J D Hutchison; A Gregori
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Outcome after treatment of complications of Gamma nailing: a prospective study of 554 trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Kristian Bjørgul; Olav Reikerås
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Peri-implant femoral fractures: The risk is more than three times higher within PFN compared with DHS.

Authors:  F Müller; M Galler; M Zellner; C Bäuml; A Marzouk; B Füchtmeier
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Gamma nails revisited: gamma nails versus compression hip screws in the management of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; Emil Schemitsch; Anders Jönsson; Michael Zlowodzki; George J Haidukewych
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.512

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.