| Literature DB >> 26893822 |
Yana Konokhova1,2, Sally Spendiff1,2, R Thomas Jagoe3, Sudhakar Aare2, Sophia Kapchinsky1, Norah J MacMillan1, Paul Rozakis1, Martin Picard4, Mylène Aubertin-Leheudre5, Charlotte H Pion5, Jean Bourbeau6, Russell T Hepple1,2,7, Tanja Taivassalo1,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Low mitochondrial content and oxidative capacity are well-established features of locomotor muscle dysfunction, a prevalent and debilitating systemic occurrence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although the exact cause is not firmly established, physical inactivity and oxidative stress are among the proposed underlying mechanisms. Here, we assess the impact of COPD pathophysiology on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) integrity, biogenesis, and cellular oxidative capacity in locomotor muscle of COPD patients and healthy controls. We hypothesized that the high oxidative stress environment of COPD muscle would yield a higher presence of deletion-containing mtDNA and oxidative-deficient fibers and impaired capacity for mitochondrial biogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: COX deficiency; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Laser capture microscopy; Mitochondrial DNA; Mitochondrial biogenesis; Muscle oxidative impairment; Oxidative stress; TFAM; mtDNA copy number
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26893822 PMCID: PMC4758107 DOI: 10.1186/s13395-016-0083-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Skelet Muscle ISSN: 2044-5040 Impact factor: 4.912
Descriptive characteristics of healthy controls and patients with COPD
| Characteristics | Control ( | COPD ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 68 ± 6 | 66 ± 5 |
| Smoking, pack-years | 3.4 ± 10.4 | 64.4 ± 37.1* |
| Weight, kg | 80.1 ± 14.2 | 71.2 ± 17.2 |
| Height, m | 171.9 ± 4.4 | 169.7 ± 7.5 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 26.8 ± 3.8 | 28.8 ± 11.9 |
| FEV1, % pred | 107.9 ± 21.9 | 40.7 ± 13.9* |
| FEV1/FVC, % pred | 78.5 ± 7.3 | 51.4 ± 13.9* |
| TLC, % pred | 103.1 ± 13.3 | 122.2 ± 17.2* |
| RV, % pred | 95.8 ± 37.1 | 172.1 ± 37.4* |
| DLCO, % pred | 105.3 ± 14.3 | 53.2 ± 16.7* |
| Peak VO2, % pred | 92.2 ± 17.4 | 38.4 ± 13.3* |
| Peak work, % pred | 112.3 ± 21.6 | 36.5 ± 19.3* |
| Fiber CSA (μm2) | 5684.6 ± 1328.7 | 5007.9 ± 1181.4 |
| Fiber type 1, % | 48.10 ± 20.3 | 24.0 ± 9.8* |
| Type II shiftersa, % | 20 | 73* |
Values presented as mean ± SD
Abbreviations: COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, BMI body mass index, FEV forced expiratory volume in one second , FVC forced vital capacity, TLC total lung capacity, RV residual volume, DLCO lung diffusion capacity, CSA cross section area
*p < 0.05
aNumber of patients with <27 % myosin heavy chain type 1 fibers
Fig. 2Presence of mtDNA deletions in COPD locomotor muscle corresponds to higher levels of DNA damage, smoking history, and aerobic capacity. a Higher levels of oxidatively damaged guanosine (pg of 8-OHdG per mL of total DNA) in COPD patients with mtDNA deletions (456.8 ± 45.7) compared to patients without detectable mtDNA deletions (196.9 ± 28.6; ***P < 0.001). b Higher number of smoking pack-years in COPD patients harboring mtDNA deletions (66.3 ± 7.5) compared to COPD patients without detectable mtDNA deletions (38.0 ± 7.3). c Lower maximal oxygen consumption in COPD patients harboring mtDNA deletions (33.7 ± 2.4 % predicted) compared to COPD patients without detectable mtDNA deletions (45.6 ± 5.6 %). Graphs show mean ± SEM (*P < 0.05)
Fig. 1Higher prevalence of damaged protein and DNA in COPD vastus lateralis skeletal muscle. a Higher levels of 4-hydroxynonenal (HNE)-adduct containing proteins in COPD patients (0.85 ± 0.13; n = 17) compared to age-matched controls (0.43 ± 0.11; n = 10; *P < 0.05). b Higher concentration of oxidatively damaged guanosine (pg of 8-OHdG per uL of total DNA) in COPD muscle (386 ± 40.64; n = 29) compared to age-matched controls (258.0 ± 21.44; n = 16; *P < 0.01). c Representative image of long-range PCR gel demonstrating mtDNA deletions in COPD and control subjects. Lane 1: wild-type mtDNA taken from a young adult demonstrating the full-length (10.774 kb) amplified PCR product. Lane 2: mtDNA taken from a subject known to harbor a single mtDNA deletion resulting in an amplified product of 7.1 kb, thus demonstrating the specificity of this technique in detecting mtDNA deletions. Lanes 3–8, 16–25, and 28–29 show the presence of deletion-containing amplicons together with wild-type mtDNA product in most COPD subjects. Lanes 9–14 and 26–27 show the presence of the full-length wild-type mtDNA product and deletion-containing amplicons in control subjects. Graphs show mean ± SEM
Fig. 3Dual COX/SDH histological staining to detect respiratory chain deficiency attributable to mtDNA deletions in vastus lateralis muscle. a Cross-sectional images from a representative control subject demonstrating uniform, normal-COX staining (left) and a COPD patient with respiratory-deficient fibers highlighted (red arrows, middle) as well as the lack of staining (right) reflecting depletion of mitochondria in muscle fibers. b Proportions of COX-normal (COX+/SDH+), COX-deficient (COX−/SDH+), and mitochondria-depleted (COXlow/SDHlow) fibers presented as individual percentages in controls (n = 14) and COPD subjects (n = 21). (Inset) Higher proportion of abnormal fibers (combined COX−/SDH+ and mitochondria-depleted fibers) in COPD patients (957 of 8136 fibers) compared to control subjects (158 of 5182 fibers). Graphs show mean ± SEM (***P < 0.001). Scale bar is 50 μm
Fig. 4MtDNA copy number measured by real-time PCR in vastus lateralis muscle of control and COPD subjects. a Lower mtDNA copy number in homogenate muscle samples of COPD (1.9 ± 0.45, n = 15) compared to controls (5.1 ± 1.1, n = 13; *P < 0.05). b MtDNA copy number in single COX-normal (COX+/SDH+; n = 12 fibers per group) and COX-deficient (COX−/SDH+; n = 13 fibers per group) muscle fibers, demonstrating an upregulation of mtDNA copy number in COX-deficient fibers of controls (5.3 ± 0.89 compared to 2.4 ± 0.42 in COX-normal) but not in COPD muscle (1.1 ± 0.23 in COX-deficient fibers compared to 0.78 ± 0.14 in COX-normal). Graphs show mean ± SEM (*P < 0.05)
Fig. 5Markers of mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative metabolism in vastus lateralis muscle homogenates of COPD patients relative to controls. a Higher levels of mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative metabolism markers in COPD (two-way ANOVA revealed the significant main effect of disease status, P < 0.01; TFAM and PGC-1α; COPD n = 17, controls n = 11, NRF1, PGC1β, PPAR δ, and PPAR γ; COPD n = 9 controls n = 9). b Significant correlation between upregulated mitochondrial biogenesis signals PGC-1α and TFAM in COPD patients (r 2 = 0.99, n = 10; P < 0.001). c Levels of TFAM protein in COPD patients (0.76 ± 0.14, n = 20) and control subjects (1.0 ± 0.23, n = 10; P = 0.18) assessed by Western blot. d Lower ratio of TFAM protein relative to TFAM mRNA in COPD patients (0.25 ± 0.07) compared to controls (0.94 ± 0.2; *P < 0.5). e Lower levels of citric synthase activity in COPD patients (4.62 ± 0.33, n = 19) than controls (13.44 ± 1.14, n = 14; ***P < 0.001). f Positive relationship between TFAM and CS exists in controls (r 2 = 0.67, P < 0.1) but not in COPD patients (r 2 < 0.1). Measured levels of CS activity in COPD are 51 % lower than predicted for the measured TFAM protein. Graphs show mean ± SEM
Fig. 6Abnormal expression pattern of TFAM protein in individual COX-deficient (COX−/SDH+) fibers of COPD locomotor muscle. a–b Representative images of muscle immunofluorescently labeled for TFAM showing higher levels of a TFAM protein in COX-deficient fibers compared to COX-normal fibers in vastus lateralis muscle of control subjects and b no difference in TFAM protein between COX-normal and COX-deficient fibers in COPD patients. Slow-twitch and fast-twitch muscle fibers identified as I and II, respectively, representing myosin heavy chain (MHC) I and MHC II fibers; scale bar is 50 μm. c Quantification of TFAM protein content in individual COX-normal (COX+/SDH+) and COX-deficient (COX−/SDH+) fibers reveals higher content in COX-deficient compared to COX-normal slow-twitch (***P < 0.001) and fast-twitch fibers (*P < 0.05) within control muscle, but no such difference in COPD muscle