Literature DB >> 26893140

Estimation of Radiation Dose in CT Based on Projection Data.

Xiaoyu Tian1, Zhye Yin2, Bruno De Man2, Ehsan Samei3,4.   

Abstract

Managing and optimizing radiation dose has become a core problem for the CT community. As a fundamental step for dose optimization, accurate and computationally efficient dose estimates are crucial. The purpose of this study was to devise a computationally efficient projection-based dose metric. The absorbed energy and object mass were individually modeled using the projection data. The absorbed energy was estimated using the difference between intensity of the primary photon and the exit photon. The mass was estimated using the volume under the attenuation profile. The feasibility of the approach was evaluated across phantoms with a broad size range, various kVp settings, and two bowtie filters, using a simulation tool, the Computer Assisted Tomography SIMulator (CATSIM) software. The accuracy of projection-based dose estimation was validated against Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The relationship between projection-based dose metric and MC dose estimate was evaluated using regression models. The projection-based dose metric showed a strong correlation with Monte Carlo dose estimates (R (2) > 0.94). The prediction errors for the projection-based dose metric were all below 15 %. This study demonstrated the feasibility of computationally efficient dose estimation requiring only the projection data.

Keywords:  CT; Computed tomography; Patient-specific dosimetry

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26893140      PMCID: PMC5023522          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9869-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  15 in total

1.  Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Guang Hong Chen; Willi Kalender; Shuai Leng; Ehsan Samei; Katsuyuki Taguchi; Ge Wang; Lifeng Yu; Roderic I Pettigrew
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  CT dosimetry considerations in non typical conditions: the effect of scan field of view and table height selection.

Authors:  Ioannis A Tsalafoutas; Paraskevi Georgolopoulou; Ioannis Abatzoglou
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Radiation exposure from CT scans: how to close our knowledge gaps, monitor and safeguard exposure--proceedings and recommendations of the Radiation Dose Summit, sponsored by NIBIB, February 24-25, 2011.

Authors:  John M Boone; William R Hendee; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Steven E Seltzer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The UF/NCI family of hybrid computational phantoms representing the current US population of male and female children, adolescents, and adults--application to CT dosimetry.

Authors:  Amy M Geyer; Shannon O'Reilly; Choonsik Lee; Daniel J Long; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Impact of miscentering on patient dose and image noise in x-ray CT imaging: phantom and clinical studies.

Authors:  M A Habibzadeh; M R Ay; A R Kamali Asl; H Ghadiri; H Zaidi
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk for pediatric chest CT.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ehsan Samei; W Paul Segars; Gregory M Sturgeon; James G Colsher; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Ay; Abolfazl Mehranian; Asghar Maleki; Hossien Ghadiri; Pardis Ghafarian; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.685

9.  Emergency department computed tomography utilization in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Carl T Berdahl; Marian J Vermeulen; David B Larson; Michael J Schull
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 5.721

10.  Realistic CT simulation using the 4D XCAT phantom.

Authors:  W P Segars; M Mahesh; T J Beck; E C Frey; B M W Tsui
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.