Literature DB >> 26891148

Effect of Character-Audience Similarity on the Perceived Effectiveness of Antismoking PSAs via Engagement.

Minji Kim1, Rui Shi1, Joseph N Cappella1.   

Abstract

This study assesses the impact of character-audience similarity, a core aspect of tailored communication, on evaluation of antismoking public service announcements (PSAs). Smoker and persuader characters are distinguished to explore their different roles in message effectiveness. Daily adult smokers (n = 1,160) were exposed to four video PSAs randomly selected from a larger pool. Similarity scores were determined from matching in demographic (age, gender, race) and motivational factors (quitting status) between the audience and the PSA's characters. Results show that PSAs featuring distinctive smoker and/or persuader characters yielded significantly higher message engagement and perceived effectiveness (PE) than PSAs without characters. Given the presence of characters, smoker-audience similarity was positively associated with the engagement, which in turn enhanced PE. Persuader-audience similarity failed to predict increases in either engagement or PE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26891148      PMCID: PMC5109824          DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1048421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  18 in total

1.  The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives.

Authors:  M C Green; T C Brock
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-11

2.  Effect of the first federally funded US antismoking national media campaign.

Authors:  Tim McAfee; Kevin C Davis; Robert L Alexander; Terry F Pechacek; Rebecca Bunnell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Why are Tailored Messages More Effective? A Multiple Mediation Analysis of a Breast Cancer Screening Intervention.

Authors:  Jakob D Jensen; Andy J King; Nicholas Carcioppolo; LaShara Davis
Journal:  J Commun       Date:  2012-10

4.  Conceptualizing the Influence of Social Agents of Behavior Change: A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of HIV-Prevention Interventionists for Different Groups.

Authors:  Marta R Durantini; Dolores Albarracín; Amy L Mitchell; Allison N Earl; Jeffrey C Gillette
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Christina N Benac; Melissa S Harris
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Web-based smoking-cessation programs: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Victor J Strecher; Jennifer B McClure; Gwen L Alexander; Bibhas Chakraborty; Vijay N Nair; Janine M Konkel; Sarah M Greene; Linda M Collins; Carola C Carlier; Cheryl J Wiese; Roderick J Little; Cynthia S Pomerleau; Ovide F Pomerleau
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.

Authors:  Xiaoquan Zhao; Andrew Strasser; Joseph N Cappella; Caryn Lerman; Martin Fishbein
Journal:  Commun Methods Meas       Date:  2011-03-04

8.  Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials.

Authors:  M W Kreuter; F C Bull; E M Clark; D L Oswald
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Effects of different types of antismoking ads on reducing disparities in smoking cessation among socioeconomic subgroups.

Authors:  Sarah J Durkin; Lois Biener; Melanie A Wakefield
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire.

Authors:  T F Heatherton; L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; K O Fagerström
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1991-09
View more
  9 in total

1.  Designing Effective Testimonial Pictorial Warning Labels for Tobacco Products.

Authors:  Emily Brennan; Erin Maloney; Yotam Ophir; Joseph N Cappella
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2018-07-09

2.  Does Segmentation Really Work? Effectiveness of Matched Graphic Health Warnings on Cigarette Packaging by Race, Gender and Chronic Disease Conditions on Cognitive Outcomes among Vulnerable Populations.

Authors:  Hana Hayashi; Andy Tan; Ichiro Kawachi; Sara Minsky; Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2018-06-18

3.  Effects of Communication Source and Racial Representation in Clinical Trial Recruitment Flyers.

Authors:  Sungkyoung Lee; Namyeon Lee; Ciera Elaine Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2021-09-16

4.  Lift Me Up by Looking Down: Social Comparison Effects of Narratives.

Authors:  Stefan Krause; Silvana Weber
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-18

5.  "Hey, that could be me": The role of similarity in narrative persuasion.

Authors:  Joëlle Ooms; John Hoeks; Carel Jansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Observational learning of the televised consequences of drinking alcohol: Exploring the role of perceived similarity.

Authors:  Mira Mayrhofer; Jörg Matthes
Journal:  Nordisk Alkohol Nark       Date:  2020-09-10

Review 7.  Psychological Impact and Influence of Animation on Viewer's Visual Attention and Cognition: A Systematic Literature Review, Open Challenges, and Future Research Directions.

Authors:  C K Praveen; Kathiravan Srinivasan
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Social-contextual factors interact with masculinity to influence college men's HPV vaccination intentions: The role of descriptive norms, prototypes, and physician gender.

Authors:  Jennifer A Orr; Sasha D Rogelberg; Laurel M Peterson; Nils Olsen
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2022-09-06

9.  Narrative Voice Matters! Improving Smoking Prevention with Testimonial Messages through Identification and Cognitive Processes.

Authors:  Juan-José Igartua; Laura Rodríguez-Contreras
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.