OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there may be a common mechanism resulting in global sensory impairment of the five classical senses (vision, smell, hearing, touch, and taste) in older adults. DESIGN: Representative, population-based study. SETTING: National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling U.S. adults aged 57 to 85. MEASUREMENTS: The frequency with which impairment co-occurred across the five senses was estimated as an integrated measure of sensory aging. It was hypothesized that multisensory deficits would be common and reflect global sensory impairment that would largely explain the effects of age, sex, and race on sensory dysfunction. RESULTS: Two-thirds of subjects had two or more sensory deficits, 27% had just one, and 6% had none. Seventy-four percent had impairment in taste, 70% in touch, 22% in smell, 20% in corrected vision, and 18% in corrected hearing. Older adults, men, African Americans, and Hispanics had greater multisensory impairment (all P < .01). Global sensory impairment largely accounted for the effects of age, sex, and race on the likelihood of impairment in each of the five senses. CONCLUSION: Multisensory impairment is prevalent in older U.S. adults. These data support the concept of a common process that underlies sensory aging across the five senses. Clinicians assessing individuals with a sensory deficit should consider further evaluation for additional co-occurring sensory deficits.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there may be a common mechanism resulting in global sensory impairment of the five classical senses (vision, smell, hearing, touch, and taste) in older adults. DESIGN: Representative, population-based study. SETTING: National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling U.S. adults aged 57 to 85. MEASUREMENTS: The frequency with which impairment co-occurred across the five senses was estimated as an integrated measure of sensory aging. It was hypothesized that multisensory deficits would be common and reflect global sensory impairment that would largely explain the effects of age, sex, and race on sensory dysfunction. RESULTS: Two-thirds of subjects had two or more sensory deficits, 27% had just one, and 6% had none. Seventy-four percent had impairment in taste, 70% in touch, 22% in smell, 20% in corrected vision, and 18% in corrected hearing. Older adults, men, African Americans, and Hispanics had greater multisensory impairment (all P < .01). Global sensory impairment largely accounted for the effects of age, sex, and race on the likelihood of impairment in each of the five senses. CONCLUSION:Multisensory impairment is prevalent in older U.S. adults. These data support the concept of a common process that underlies sensory aging across the five senses. Clinicians assessing individuals with a sensory deficit should consider further evaluation for additional co-occurring sensory deficits.
Authors: L Philip Schumm; Martha McClintock; Sharon Williams; Sara Leitsch; Johan Lundstrom; Thomas Hummel; Stacy Tessler Lindau Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2009-06-23 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Julie Schneider; Bamini Gopinath; Catherine McMahon; Erdahl Teber; Stephen R Leeder; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2012-03-03 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Claire Murphy; Carla R Schubert; Karen J Cruickshanks; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; David M Nondahl Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-11-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Dima M Qato; G Caleb Alexander; Rena M Conti; Michael Johnson; Phil Schumm; Stacy Tessler Lindau Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-12-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Bamini Gopinath; Julie Schneider; Catherine M McMahon; George Burlutsky; Stephen R Leeder; Paul Mitchell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis; Can-Lan Sun; William P Tew; Supriya Gupta Mohile; Ajeet Gajra; Heidi D Klepin; Cynthia Owusu; Cary Philip Gross; Hyman B Muss; Stuart M Lichtman; Andrew E Chapman; Harvey Jay Cohen; William Dale; Heeyoung Kim; Simone Fernandes; Vani Katheria; Arti Hurria Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Stephen B Kritchevsky; Daniel E Forman; Kathryn E Callahan; E Wesley Ely; Kevin P High; Frances McFarland; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Kenneth E Schmader; Stephanie A Studenski; John Williams; Susan Zieman; Jack M Guralnik Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jesse K Siegel; Sunny Y Kung; Kristen E Wroblewski; David W Kern; Martha K McClintock; Jayant M Pinto Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Robinson Ramírez-Vélez; José Francisco López-Gil; Mikel López Sáez de Asteasu; Mikel Izquierdo; Antonio García-Hermoso Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 4.379