Literature DB >> 26889134

Changes in Urolithiasis Referral Patterns for Shock Wave Lithotripsy over a Decade: Was There Adherence to AUA/EAU Guidelines?

Yasser A Noureldin1, Mohamed A Elkoushy2, Sero Andonian3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to assess changes in referral patterns of urolithiasis for shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) over a decade. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of the number of years of practice of referring physicians on these referral patterns.
METHODS: A retrospective review of SWL database was performed for consecutive referrals for SWL at a tertiary stone center between December 1999 and December 2013. Patient demographics and stone characteristics were assessed. The stone location at the time of referral was used as the reference. Retreatments were excluded. In addition, years of practice of the referring physicians were calculated. The 2007 AUA/EAU guidelines on urolithiasis were considered as a reference.
RESULTS: A total of 8,992 SWL treatments were included. After December 2007, there was a significant increase in the percentage of renal pelvic stones referred for SWL (23.0 vs. 27.1%, p < 0.001). Conversely, proximal ureteral stones significantly decreased after 2007 (24 vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001) including stones > 10 mm (5.1 vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001). Otherwise, there were no changes in the referral patterns for SWL of other stone locations before and after December 2007 (p > 0.05). Furthermore, percentage of stones referred for SWL by urologists practicing for less than 10 years significantly decreased after December 2007 (29.5 vs. 22.8%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The significant reduction in the referral of proximal ureteral stones after December 2007 corresponds to the latest AUA/EAU guidelines on management of ureteral stones.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guidelines; Lithotripsy; Referral; Shock waves; Urolithiasis

Year:  2015        PMID: 26889134      PMCID: PMC4748804          DOI: 10.1159/000365706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol        ISSN: 1661-7649


  21 in total

1.  Contemporary surgical management of upper urinary tract calculi.

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association.

Authors:  J W Segura; G M Preminger; D G Assimos; S P Dretler; R I Kahn; J E Lingeman; J N Macaluso
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Joshua D Wiesenthal; Daniela Ghiculete; R John D'A Honey; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-07-13

4.  Variation in clinical outcome following shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  N F Logarakis; M A Jewett; J Luymes; R J Honey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The surgical management of kidney stone disease: a population based time series analysis.

Authors:  Michael Ordon; David Urbach; Muhammad Mamdani; Refik Saskin; R John D'A Honey; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  10-year experience with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the state of Colorado.

Authors:  S A Grampsas; M Moore; P S Chandhoke
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.

Authors:  C Chaussy; E Schmiedt; D Jocham; W Brendel; B Forssmann; V Walther
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Evaluation of the effects of relationships between main spatial lower pole calyceal anatomic factors on the success of shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with lower pole kidney stones.

Authors:  Tayfun Sahinkanat; Hasan Ekerbicer; Bulent Onal; Nejat Tansu; Sefa Resim; Sinharib Citgez; Armagan Oner
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  What happened to shockwave lithotripsy during the past 22 years? A single-center experience.

Authors:  Gideon Lorber; Mordechai Duvdevani; Ofer N Gofrit; Arie Latke; Ran Katz; Ezekiel H Landau; Shimon Meretyk; Dov Pode; Amos Shapiro
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  The impact of clinical guidelines on practice patterns: doing more versus doing less.

Authors:  C E Carpenter; N E Johnson; J F Rosenfeld
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.852

View more
  1 in total

1.  Outcomes and costs of ureteroscopy, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of urolithiasis: an analysis based on health insurance claims data in Germany.

Authors:  Claudia Schulz; Benedikt Becker; Christopher Netsch; Thomas R W Herrmann; Andreas J Gross; Jens Westphal; Thomas Knoll; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.