Hye-Young Heo1,2, Yi Zhang1, Dong-Hoon Lee1, Shanshan Jiang1, Xuna Zhao1, Jinyuan Zhou1,2. 1. Divison of MR Research, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 2. F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of accelerated chemical-exchange-saturation-transfer (CEST) imaging using a combination of compressed sensing (CS) and sensitivity encoding (SENSE) at 3 Tesla. THEORY AND METHODS: Two healthy volunteers and six high-grade glioma patients were recruited. Raw CEST image k-space data were acquired (with varied radiofrequency saturation power levels for the healthy volunteer study), and a sequential CS and SENSE reconstruction (CS-SENSE) was assessed. The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) signals were compared with varied CS-SENSE acceleration factors. RESULTS: In the healthy volunteer study, a CS-SENSE acceleration factor of R = 2 × 2 (CS × SENSE) was achieved without compromising the reconstructed MTRasym (3.5 ppm) image quality. The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) signals obtained from the CS-SENSE reconstruction with R = 2 × 2 were well preserved compared with the reference image (R = 2 for only SENSE). In the glioma patient study, the MTRasym (3.5 ppm) signals were significantly higher in the tumor region (Gd-enhancing tumor core) than in the normal-appearing white matter (P < 0.001). There was no significant MTRasym (3.5 ppm) difference between the reference image and CS-SENSE-reconstructed image in the acceleration factor of R = 2 × 2. CONCLUSION: Combining the SENSE technique with CS (R = 2 × 2) enables considerable acceleration of CEST image acquisition and potentially has a wide range of clinical applications. Magn Reson Med 77:779-786, 2017.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of accelerated chemical-exchange-saturation-transfer (CEST) imaging using a combination of compressed sensing (CS) and sensitivity encoding (SENSE) at 3 Tesla. THEORY AND METHODS: Two healthy volunteers and six high-grade gliomapatients were recruited. Raw CEST image k-space data were acquired (with varied radiofrequency saturation power levels for the healthy volunteer study), and a sequential CS and SENSE reconstruction (CS-SENSE) was assessed. The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) signals were compared with varied CS-SENSE acceleration factors. RESULTS: In the healthy volunteer study, a CS-SENSE acceleration factor of R = 2 × 2 (CS × SENSE) was achieved without compromising the reconstructed MTRasym (3.5 ppm) image quality. The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) signals obtained from the CS-SENSE reconstruction with R = 2 × 2 were well preserved compared with the reference image (R = 2 for only SENSE). In the gliomapatient study, the MTRasym (3.5 ppm) signals were significantly higher in the tumor region (Gd-enhancing tumor core) than in the normal-appearing white matter (P < 0.001). There was no significant MTRasym (3.5 ppm) difference between the reference image and CS-SENSE-reconstructed image in the acceleration factor of R = 2 × 2. CONCLUSION: Combining the SENSE technique with CS (R = 2 × 2) enables considerable acceleration of CEST image acquisition and potentially has a wide range of clinical applications. Magn Reson Med 77:779-786, 2017.
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Adrienne N Dula; Lori R Arlinghaus; Richard D Dortch; Blake E Dewey; Jennifer G Whisenant; Gregory D Ayers; Thomas E Yankeelov; Seth A Smith Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hye-Young Heo; Yi Zhang; Tina M Burton; Shanshan Jiang; Yansong Zhao; Peter C M van Zijl; Richard Leigh; Jinyuan Zhou Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Robert J Harris; Jingwen Yao; Ararat Chakhoyan; Catalina Raymond; Kevin Leu; Linda M Liau; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Albert Lai; Noriko Salamon; Whitney B Pope; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jing Liu; Renyuan Bai; Yuguo Li; Verena Staedtke; Shuixing Zhang; Peter C M van Zijl; Guanshu Liu Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-03-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Huajun She; Joshua S Greer; Shu Zhang; Bian Li; Jochen Keupp; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Ivan E Dimitrov; Robert E Lenkinski; Elena Vinogradov Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-08-26 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Zhengwei Zhou; Maxim Bez; Wafa Tawackoli; Joseph Giaconi; Dmitriy Sheyn; Sandra de Mel; Marcel M Maya; Barry D Pressman; Zulma Gazit; Gadi Pelled; Dan Gazit; Debiao Li Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Lee Sze Foo; George Harston; Amit Mehndiratta; Wun-She Yap; Yan Chai Hum; Khin Wee Lai; Shahizon Azura Mohamed Mukari; Faizah Mohd Zaki; Yee Kai Tee Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2021-08