| Literature DB >> 26887644 |
Xiaojie Li1,2,3, Zhuangzhi Zhang1,2,3, Shancun Qu1,2,3, Guangjin Liang1,2,3, Juan Sun1,2,3, Nan Zhao1,2,3, Cuiju Cui1,2,3, Zengmei Cao1,2,3, Yan Li1,2,3, Jinhua Pan1,2,3, Shenhui Yu1,2,3, Qingyan Wang1,2,3, Xia Li1,2,3, Shiju Luo1,2,3, Shaofeng Song1,2,3, Li Guo4,5,6, Guanpin Yang4,5,6.
Abstract
Dongfang no.7 (Saccharina japonica) was bred and maintained by hybridizing gametophytes, self-crossing the best individuals, selecting the best self-crossing line and seedling-raising from yearly reconstructed sporophytes. It increased the air dry yield by 43.2% in average over 2 widely farmed controls. Dongfang no.7 was seedling-raised from bulked sporophytes reconstructed from its representative gametophyte clones. Such strategy ensured it against variety contamination due to possible cross fertilization and occasional mixing and inbred depletion due to self-crossing number-limited sporophytes year after year. It derived from an intraspecific hybrid through 4 rounds of self-crossing and selection and retained a certain degree of genetic heterozygosity, thus being immune to inbred depletion due to purification of unknown detrimental alleles. Most importantly, it can be farmed in currently available system as the seedlings for large scale culture can be raised from reconstructed Dongfang no.7 sporophytes. Breeding and maintaining Dongfang no.7 provided a model that other varieties of kelp (S. japonica) and brown algae may follow during their domestication.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26887644 PMCID: PMC4757934 DOI: 10.1038/srep21255
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flow chart of breeding and maintaining Dongfang no.7 (S. japonica).
Figure 2The morphological characteristics of Dongfang no. 7.
(A), the blades of Dongfang no. 7 (below a ruler, left), Kuanbao haidai (middle) and Korean kelp (right); (B), the blade tip of Dongfang no. 7 under a ruler; (C), the widest part of Dongfang no. 7 (left), Kuanbao haidai (middle) and Korean kelp (right) under a ruler; (D), Blade disc pile, 10 each, of Dongfang no. 7 (left), Kuanbao haidai (middle) and Korean kelp (right) beside a ruler.
The morphological characteristics of different varieties at harvesting.
| Year | Line | Length (cm) | Width (cm) | Thickness (mm) | Fresh weight (kg) | Dry weight (kg) | Yield (ton/ha) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kuanbao haidai | 283.0 | 43.0 | 2.0 | 1.428 | 0.198 | na | |
| Korean kelp | 282.0 | 28.0 | 2.4 | 0.750 | 0.115 | na | |
| 2008 | Hybrid | 333.4 ± 31.5 | 43.2 ± 4.3 | 2.4 ± 0.19 | 1.638 | 0.212 | 38.2 |
| 2009 | SP1 | 315.0 ± 70.2 | 45.3 ± 12.6 | 2.4 ± 0.24 | 1.602 | 0.205 | 36.9 |
| 2010 | SP2 | 335.0 ± 60.3 | 47.0 ± 8.1 | 2.5 ± 0.23 | 1.688 | 0.218 | 39.2 |
| 2011 | SP3 | 326.3 ± 33.4 | 49.3 ± 4.9 | 2.7 ± 0.24 | 1.738 | 0.227 | 40.9 |
| 2012 | SP4(DF7) | 318.9 ± 31.6 | 48.5 ± 4.8 | 2.7 ± 0.21 | 1.710 | 0.221 | 39.8 |
| 2013 | DF7 | 308.2 ± 30.2 | 45.1 ± 4.4 | 2.6 ± 0.20 | 1.605 | 0.201 | 36.2 |
| 2014 | DF7 | 332.5 ± 31.8 | 53.2 ± 5.3 | 2.7 ± 0.21 | 1.786 | 0.210 | 37.8 |
| rDF7 | 336.5 ± 31.7 | 52.5 ± 5.0 | 2.7 ± 0.20 | 1.792 | 0.212 | 38.2 | |
| 2015 | DF7 | 307.5 ± 29.2 | 45.3 ± 4.3 | 2.6 ± 0.21 | 1.645 | 0.192 | 34.6 |
| C1 | 286.8 ± 43.4 | 38.7 ± 6.4 | 2.4 ± 0.41 | 1.314 | 0.148 | 26.6 | |
| C2 | 270.3 ± 47.1 | 39.3 ± 7.1 | 2.3 ± 0.47 | 1.310 | 0.144 | 25.9 | |
| DF7 | 327.5 ± 32.3 | 49.4 ± 4.8 | 2.6 ± 0.20 | 1.746 | 0.209 | 37.6 | |
| rDF7 | 328.7 ± 30.6 | 50.6 ± 4.8 | 2.6 ± 0.19 | 1.781 | 0.211 | 38.0 |
*seedling was raised from bulked sporophytes of DF7 matured year after year.
**seedling was raised from rDF7 matured in 2014.
***the average of 50 blades.
****dry weight × 180.000; SP, selection population; DF7, Dongfang no. 7; C1, Control 1; C2, Control 2; rDF7, reconstructed Dongfang no. 7; na, not applicable.
Figure 3Change of the variation index of blade length (red), width (grey) and thickness (yellow) during breeding.
Observed heterosis or increase of the traits of Dongfang no.7 (%).
| Average heterosis of hybrid | Maximum average increase over 2 source sporophytes | Increase of Dongfang no.7 over Control 1 | Increase of Dongfang no.7 over Control 2 | Average increase over 2 controls | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 18.0 | 18.6 | 14.2 | 21.2 | 17.6 |
| Width | 21.7 | 38.9 | 27.6 | 25.7 | 26.7 |
| Thickness | 9.1 | 22.7 | 8.3 | 13.0 | 10.6 |
| Fresh weight | 50.4 | 59.6 | 32.9 | 33.3 | 33.1 |
| Air dry weight | 35.5 | 45.0 | 41.2 | 45.1 | 43.2 |
| Yield | na | na | 41.4 | 45.2 | 43.2 |
1based on the traits of hybrid evaluated in 2008 and those of the source sporophyte individuals of parental gametophyte clones.
2based on the traits of Dongfang no.7 seedling-raised from reconstructed sporophytes evaluated in 2015; na, not applicable.
The genetic parameters estimated with microsatellites.
| Variety | Na | Ne | Ho | He | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dongfang no. 7 | 1.826 | 1.137 | 0.127 | 0.118 | 0.117 |
| Control 1 | 2.256 | 1.667 | 0.445 | 0.328 | 0.397 |
| Control 2 | 2.135 | 1.568 | 0.419 | 0.307 | 0.385 |
| Reconstructed Dongfang no. 7 | 1.810 | 1.162 | 0.141 | 0.134 | 0.142 |
| Gametophyte clones for reconstruction | 1.810 | 1.122 | — | — | 0.160 |
*seedling-raised from bulked sporophytes of Dongfang no. 7 matured year after year.
**monoploidy gametophytes were treated as pure diploid; --, no biological meaning.