| Literature DB >> 17704538 |
Shi-Hua Cheng1, Jie-Yun Zhuang, Ye-Yang Fan, Jing-Hong Du, Li-Yong Cao.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: China has been successful in breeding hybrid rice strains, but is now facing challenges to develop new hybrids with high-yielding potential, better grain quality, and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. This paper reviews the most significant advances in hybrid rice breeding in China, and presents a recent study on fine-mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for yield traits. SCOPE: By exploiting new types of male sterility, hybrid rice production in China has become more diversified. The use of inter-subspecies crosses has made an additional contribution to broadening the genetic diversity of hybrid rice and played an important role in the breeding of super rice hybrids in China. With the development and application of indica-inclined and japonica-inclined parental lines, new rice hybrids with super high-yielding potential have been developed and are being grown on a large scale. DNA markers for subspecies differentiation have been identified and applied, and marker-assisted selection performed for the development of restorer lines carrying disease resistance genes. The genetic basis of heterosis in highly heterotic hybrids has been studied, but data from these studies are insufficient to draw sound conclusions. In a QTL study using stepwise residual heterozygous lines, two linked intervals harbouring QTLs for yield traits were resolved, one of which was delimited to a 125-kb region.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17704538 PMCID: PMC2759200 DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcm121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Bot ISSN: 0305-7364 Impact factor: 4.357
Trend required in rice production and yield to maintain rice self-sufficiency in China
| Year | Total output (×106 t)* | Increase (%)† | Yield (t ha–2) | Increase (%)† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 195·0 | 6·85 | 6·180 | 4·4 |
| 2010 | 217·5 | 19·18 | 6·885 | 16·3 |
| 2030 | 247·5 | 35·62 | 7·845 | 32·6 |
* Estimated based on the per capita rice consumption of 150 kg and the rice cropping area of 31·57 × 106 ha2.
† In comparison with 1995.
Yield target of super high-yielding rice varieties (the Ministry of Agriculture, P.R. China, 1996)
| Conventional rice (t ha–2)* | Hybrid rice (t ha–2)* | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | EI(Y) | E&LI(S) | SJ(Y) | SJ(N) | EI(Y) | SI&J | LI | Increase (%)† |
| 1996–2000 | 9·00 | 9·75 | 9·75 | 10·50 | 9·75 | 10·50 | 9·75 | 15 |
| 2001–2005 | 10·50 | 11·25 | 11·25 | 12·00 | 11·25 | 12·00 | 11·25 | 30 |
* Performance at two sites, 6·67 ha2 or more at each site, in two successive years. EI(Y), early-season indica rice in middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River; E&LI(S), early- or late-season indica rice in southern China; SJ(Y), single-season japonica rice in middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River; SJ(N), single-season japonica rice in northern China; SI&J, single-season indica or japonica rice; LI, late-season indica rice.
† Yield advantage in the regional yield trials over the control variety which was used in 1990 in the same trial.
FAcreage under hybrid rice in 1976–2003 in China.
Planting areas and proportion of three-line hybrid rice classified based on CMS types in 2000–2002 in China
| 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMS* | Acreage (×106 ha2) | % | Acreage (×106 ha2) | % | Acreage (×106 ha2) | % |
| WA | 6·53 | 51·45 | 7·01 | 56·47 | 6·03 | 48·06 |
| ID | 2·85 | 22·44 | 2·53 | 20·36 | 3·33 | 26·56 |
| G&D | 1·78 | 13·99 | 1·76 | 14·21 | 2·21 | 17·66 |
| DA | 1·33 | 10·48 | 0·79 | 6·39 | 0·70 | 5·61 |
| HL | 0·02 | 0·15 | 0·02 | 0·18 | 0·05 | 0·38 |
| K | 0·13 | 1·00 | 0·22 | 1·79 | 0·11 | 0·90 |
| BT | 0·06 | 0·49 | 0·07 | 0·60 | 0·11 | 0·85 |
* CMS, cytoplasmic male sterility. WA, the male sterile cytoplasm was originated from a male sterile plant in a population of Asian common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon) in Hainan, China; ID, originated from rice line Indonesia Paddy 6; G, originated from rice line Gambiaka. D, originated from an F7 population of (Dissi D52 × 37) × Ai-Jiao-Nan-Te; DA, originated from a dwarf plant of O. rufipogon from Dongxiang, Jiangxi, China; HL, originated from a cross between O. rufipogon and rice line Lian-Tang-Zao; K, originated from an F2 population (K52 × Lu-Hong-Zao 1) × Zhen-Xin-Nian 2; BT, originated from the rice line Chinsurah Boro II.
Performance of grain quality traits of CMS lines Zhong 9A and Zhenshan 97A
| CMS line | National standard* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trait | Zhong 9A | Zhenshan 97A | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Brown rice recovery (%) | 80·4 | 81·0 | ≥79·0 | ≥77·0 | ≥75·0 |
| Milled rice recovery (%) | 71·1 | 73·3 | – | – | – |
| Head rice recovery (%) | 31·3 | 34·2 | ≥56·0 | ≥54·0 | ≥52·0 |
| Grain length (mm) | 6·7 | 5·8 | – | – | – |
| Grain length/width ratio | 3·1 | 2·3 | ≥2·8 | ≥2·8 | ≥2·8 |
| Chalky grain percentage | 8 | 84 | ≤10 | ≤20 | ≤30 |
| Chalkiness (%) | 0·6 | 16·6 | ≤1·0 | ≤3·0 | ≤5·0 |
| Translucency | 3 | 4 | – | – | – |
| Alkali digestion value | 6 | 6 | – | – | – |
| Gel consistency (mm) | 32 | 30 | ≥70 | ≥60 | ≥50 |
| Amylose content (%) | 23·7 | 22·7 | 17–22 | 16–23 | 15–24 |
* National Standard for High Quality Paddy, P. R. China. GB/T 17891-1999. – indicates no requirements.
Yield performance of F1 hybrid rice Xieyou 9308 and Liangyou Pei 9
| Hybrid | Trial site | Year | Average yield (t ha–2) | Acreage (ha2) | Highest yield (t ha–2) | Acreage (ha2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xieyou 9308 | Xinchang, Zhejiang | 2000 | 11·84 | 6·8 | 12·22 | 0·07 |
| Zhuji, Zhejiang | 2000 | 11·42 | 10·0 | 11·69 | 0·13 | |
| Xinchang, Zhejiang | 2001 | 11·95 | 6·9 | 12·40 | 0·07 | |
| Xinchang, Zhejiang | 2002 | 10·52 | 70·0 | 11·46 | 16·70 | |
| Xinchang, Zhejiang | 2003 | 11·54 | 82·5 | 12·03 | 28·87 | |
| Lianyou Pei 9 | Longshan, Hunan | 2000 | 10·65 | 66·7 | 11·13 | 0·07 |
| Chunzhou, Hunan | 2000 | 11·67 | 7·7 | 12·12 | 0·69 |
FTime frame for transferring a gene cluster for blast resistance from Gumei 2 to restorer lines.
FGenotype constitution of RHLs 6-3, 6-4, 6-7 and 6-10 in the region extending from SSR markers RM190 to RM19665 on the short arm of chromosome 6 and two blocks of yield-related QTLs detected in this region. Right: the whole segment showing all the polymorphic SSR markers used and a block of QTLs that were detected in the F2 population derived from RHL 6-10 and located between RM6119 and RM19665. Left: the amplified portion extending from RM510 to RM19419, indicating a finely mapped block of QTLs that were detected in the F2 populations derived from RHLs 6-3, 6-4 and 6-7 and located between RM19407 and RM19417.
QTLs for yield traits detected in four F2 populations
| Trait* | Population | LOD | A† | D‡ | D/[A] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFGP | FM6-3 | 3·6 | −3·57 | −2·43 | −0·68 | 6·3 |
| NFGP | FM6-4 | 33·2 | −8·34 | −4·58 | −0·55 | 20·1 |
| NFGP | FM6-7 | 9·7 | −8·23 | −1·95 | −0·24 | 16·7 |
| TNSP | FM6-3 | 11·2 | −7·54 | −3·56 | −0·47 | 18·4 |
| TNSP | FM6-4 | 58·3 | −12·58 | −8·09 | −0·64 | 32·6 |
| TNSP | FM6-7 | 11·2 | −8·58 | −4·32 | −0·50 | 18·9 |
| SF | FM6-3 | 6·0 | 2·24 | 0·10 | 0·04 | 10·5 |
| SF | FM6-4 | 11·7 | 1·77 | 1·66 | 0·94 | 7·7 |
| SF | FM6-7 | 2·8 | −1·28 | 2·08 | 1·63 | 5·1 |
| TGWT | FM6-3 | 7·3 | 0·18 | 0·51 | 2·83 | 12·7 |
| TGWT | FM6-4 | 8·5 | 0·41 | 0·50 | 1·22 | 8·1 |
| TGWT | FM6-7 | 6·1 | 0·28 | 0·57 | 2·04 | 10·8 |
| NFGP | FM6-10 | 12·6 | −3·44 | 1·78 | 0·52 | 6·4 |
| TNSP | FM6-10 | 13·9 | −4·39 | 1·02 | 0·23 | 7·0 |
| SF | FM6-10 | 2·5 | 0·13 | 0·85 | 6·54 | 1·3 |
| TGWT | FM6-10 | 7·0 | −0·20 | 0·23 | 1·15 | 3·7 |
| GYD | FM6-10 | 4·7 | −1·23 | 0·39 | 0·32 | 2·4 |
* NFGP, number of filled grains per panicle; TNSP, total number of spikelets per panicle; SF, spikelet fertility; TGWT, 1000-grain weight; GYD, grain yield.
† Additive effect. Refers to the genetic effect of the putative QTL when a maternal allele was replaced by a paternal allele.
‡ Dominance effect.
§ Amount of variance explained by the putative QTL.