OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether 3PN incidence could lead to a worse pregnancy outcome of elective single blastocyst stage embryo transfer (eSBET). METHODS: This study included 706 eSBET cycles from January 2013 to March 2015. The patients were divided into two groups as follows: group 1 included 286 patients with no 3PN zygotes and group 2 included 420 patients with 3PN zygotes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: female age, endometrial thickness, infertility duration, type of infertility, main etiology of infertility, clinical pregnancy and abortion rate. RESULTS: We observed that there was no significant difference in female age, endometrial thickness, infertility duration and abortion rate between two groups. It's worth noting that the clinical pregnancy rate in 3PN > 0% group was significantly lower than 3PN = 0 group (P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: 3PN incidence might make anegative effect on pregnancy outcomes in elective single blastocyst stage embryo transfer.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether 3PN incidence could lead to a worse pregnancy outcome of elective single blastocyst stage embryo transfer (eSBET). METHODS: This study included 706 eSBET cycles from January 2013 to March 2015. The patients were divided into two groups as follows: group 1 included 286 patients with no 3PN zygotes and group 2 included 420 patients with 3PN zygotes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: female age, endometrial thickness, infertility duration, type of infertility, main etiology of infertility, clinical pregnancy and abortion rate. RESULTS: We observed that there was no significant difference in female age, endometrial thickness, infertility duration and abortion rate between two groups. It's worth noting that the clinical pregnancy rate in 3PN > 0% group was significantly lower than 3PN = 0 group (P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: 3PN incidence might make anegative effect on pregnancy outcomes in elective single blastocyst stage embryo transfer.
Authors: Mitchell P Rosen; Shehua Shen; Anthony T Dobson; Victor Y Fujimoto; Charles E McCulloch; Marcelle I Cedars Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Rita C S Figueira; Amanda S Setti; Daniela P A F Braga; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2011-07-30 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: M Plachot; A Veiga; J Montagut; J de Grouchy; G Calderon; S Lepretre; A M Junca; J Santalo; E Carles; J Mandelbaum Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 1988-07 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Joyce Chai; Tracy W Y Yeung; Vivian C Y Lee; Raymond H W Li; Estella Y L Lau; William S B Yeung; P C Ho; Ernest H Y Ng Journal: Hong Kong Med J Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 2.227
Authors: I Erlich; A Ben-Meir; I Har-Vardi; J Grifo; F Wang; C Mccaffrey; D McCulloh; Y Or; L Wolf Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 4.379