Literature DB >> 24531501

Live birth rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and obstetric outcomes of elective single and double embryo transfers: Hong Kong experience.

Joyce Chai1, Tracy W Y Yeung1, Vivian C Y Lee1, Raymond H W Li1, Estella Y L Lau1, William S B Yeung1, P C Ho1, Ernest H Y Ng1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the live birth rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and obstetric outcomes of elective single and double embryo transfers.
DESIGN: Case series with internal comparisons.
SETTING: University affiliated hospital, Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: Between October 2009 and December 2011, 206 women underwent their first in-vitro fertilisation cycle. Elective single embryo transfer was offered to women who were aged 35 years or below, and had endometrial thickness of 8 mm or more and at least two embryos of good quality. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Live birth rate, multiple birth rate, and obstetric outcomes.
RESULTS: Among the 206 eligible women, 74 underwent an elective single embryo transfer and 132 a double embryo transfer. The live birth rate was comparable in the two groups, being 39.2% in the elective single embryo transfer group and 43.2% in the double embryo transfer group, while the multiple pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the elective single embryo transfer group than the double embryo transfer group (6.9% vs 40.4%; P<0.001). Gestational ages and birth weights were comparable in the two groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the rate of preterm delivery and antenatal complications (27.6% vs 43.9%, respectively; P>0.05).
CONCLUSION: In this selected population, an elective single embryo transfer policy decreases the multiple pregnancy rate without compromising the live birth rate. The non-significant difference in antenatal complications may be related to the small sample size.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth rate; Embryo transfer; Pregnancy, multiple

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24531501     DOI: 10.12809/hkmj134065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hong Kong Med J        ISSN: 1024-2708            Impact factor:   2.227


  7 in total

1.  Prognostic value of three pro-nuclei (3PN) incidence in elective single blastocyst-stage embryo transfer.

Authors:  Mingzhao Li; Wanqiu Zhao; Wei Li; Xiaoli Zhao; Juanzi Shi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

Review 2.  Ectopic pregnancy secondary to in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer: pathogenic mechanisms and management strategies.

Authors:  Bassem Refaat; Elizabeth Dalton; William L Ledger
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 5.211

3.  Scientific research in obstetrics and gynecology: changes in the trends over three decades.

Authors:  Gamal A Kassem
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-12-16

4.  Incidence and risk factors for retinopathy of prematurity in multiple gestations: a Chinese population study.

Authors:  Gordon S K Yau; Jacky W Y Lee; Victor T Y Tam; Stan Yip; Edith Cheng; Catherine C L Liu; Benjamin C Y Chu; Ian Y H Wong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Association between baseline LH/FSH and live-birth rate after fresh-embryo transfer in polycystic ovary syndrome women.

Authors:  Nian-Jun Su; Cui-Yu Huang; Jie Liu; De-Ying Kang; Song-Lu Wang; Liu-Jun Liao; Jin-di Yang; Xi-Qian Zhang; Feng-Hua Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparisons of benefits and risks of single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shujuan Ma; Yangqin Peng; Liang Hu; Xiaojuan Wang; Yiquan Xiong; Yi Tang; Jing Tan; Fei Gong
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 7.  Infertility care and the introduction of new reproductive technologies in poor resource settings.

Authors:  Luis Bahamondes; Maria Y Makuch
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 5.211

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.