| Literature DB >> 26879683 |
Huanhuan Zhang1,2, Yaping Chu3, Ping Zhou4, Xiaojin He5, Qianhua Xu6, Zhiguo Zhang7, Yunxia Cao8, Zhaolian Wei9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the effect of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) plus climen (estradiol valerate and cyproterone acetate drug combination) on infertility patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and to determine if the combination of DHEA plus climen is superior to DHEA alone in improving ovarian response.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26879683 PMCID: PMC4754936 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-016-0139-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Fig. 1Flow diagram
Comparison of baseline characters between the two groups
| The DHEA group | The DHEA plus climen group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 37.06 ± 5.06 | 37.15 ± 5.80 | 0.929 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.18 ± 2.73 | 22.39 ± 2.48 | 0.644 |
| Primary infertility | 42.19 % | 42.67 % | 0.961 |
| Secondary infertility | 57.81 % | 57.33 % | |
| Infertility duration (years) | 6.39 ± 4.10 | 6.65 ± 5.32 | 0.761 |
| AMH (ng/ml) | 0.98 ± 0.72 | 0.90 ± 0.66 | 0.466 |
| FSH (IU/L) | 12.93 ± 7.02 | 11.86 ± 5.29 | 0.343 |
| E2 (pmol/L) | 181.53 ± 137.26 | 160.65 ± 116.90 | 0.719 |
| AFC | 3.25 ± 2.07 | 3.47 ± 1.95 | 0.059 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD (standard deviation) or percentage as appropriate
AFC the count of antral follicle
P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant
Comparison of the ovarian reserve markers pre- and post-treatment in each group
| The DHEA group |
| The DHEA plus climen group |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-treament | Post-treatment | Pre-treament | Post-treatment | |||
| AMH (ng/ml) | 0.98 ± 0.72 | 1.24 ± 1.07 | 0.015 | 0.90 ± 0.66 | 1.14 ± 0.79 | 0.001 |
| FSH(IU/L) | 12.93 ± 7.02 | 10.03 ± 5.48 | 0.003 | 11.86 ± 5.29 | 9.08 ± 5.51 | 0.001 |
| E2 (pmol/L) | 181.53 ± 137.26 | 113.96 ± 70.00 | 0.001 | 160.65 ± 116.90 | 278.50 ± 135.80 | 0.000 |
| High-FSH subgroups | ||||||
| AMH (ng/ml) | 0.88 ± 0.65 | 0.99 ± 1.06 | 0.322 | 0.68 ± 0.58 | 0.89 ± 0.75 | 0.034 |
| FSH (IU/L) | 17.35 ± 6.34 | 11.84 ± 6.45 | 0.001 | 15.40 ± 4.00 | 10.56 ± 6.54 | 0.001 |
| E2 (pmol/L) | 155.70 ± 93.43 | 122.32 ± 79.44 | 0.070 | 120.35 ± 81.91 | 276.30 ± 139.76 | 0.000 |
| Low-FSH subgroups | ||||||
| AMH (ng/ml) | 1.11 ± 0.78 | 1.56 ± 1.01 | 0.002 | 1.18 ± 0.67 | 1.45 ± 0.74 | 0.004 |
| FSH (IU/L) | 7.24 ± 1.82 | 7.69 ± 2.49 | 0.445 | 7.13 ± 2.11 | 7.14 ± 2.87 | 0.982 |
| E2 (pmol/L) | 214.75 ± 174.96 | 103.21 ± 55.14 | 0.003 | 213.37 ± 135.26 | 281.53 ± 133.33 | 0.035 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD (standard deviation) or percentage as appropriate. Subgroups were divided based on a basal FSH level cut-off of 10 mlU/ml
P <0.05 was considered as statistically significant
Fig. 2a Comparisons of IVF cycle outcomes between the DHEA plus climen group and the DHEA group. b Comparisons of IVF cycle outcomes between the two high-FSH sub-groups. c Comparisons of IVF cycle outcomes between the two low-FSH sub-groups. *P <0.05